In 2009 Toyota Motors (TM) posted a net loss of $4.6 billion ("Market watch," 2014). From 2009 to 2011 Toyota encountered a number of factors contributing to their economic downturn. It began with recalling millions of vehicles, for quality related problems, followed by natural disasters hitting northeastern Japan. These disasters wiped out Toyota’s production capabilities (Tabuchi & Vlasic, 2014). While these events were occurring, the cloud of the 2008 global financial crisis was still being felt. This crisis weakened demand in the automotive industry. This weakened demand increased the competitive landscape for all automotive manufactures. This drove down automotive prices and effectively contribution margins (i.e. sold less and made less per sale). At the end of 2011 Toyota’s stock had collapsed by approximately 70% from its peak in 2007 (Daltorio, 2012).
In 2011 Toyota appeared to be headed for the corporate graveyard; however a refocus in strategy precipitated a financial turnaround in 2012. This turnaround continues and has Toyota on track to post record earnings in 2014 (Tabuchi & Vlasic, 2014). There have been a number of factors leading to Toyota’s resurgence. The primary being Toyota’s pursuit of cost cutting. Cost cutting measures such as part standardization, emphasis on buyer power and a reduction of management wages have laid the foundation for Toyota’s improvements. These measures have resulted in lowering expenditures nearly 25% from 2007 levels (Daltorio, 2012).
This assessment will evaluate how both firm and market events impacted Toyota’s financials from 2009 through 2013. The assessment will compare and contrast indicators such as debt (D), equity (E), weighted average cost of capital (WAC...
... middle of paper ...
... (2011). Corporate finance: The core, second edition. (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.
Daltorio, T. (2012, September 26). The turnaround story that is toyota . Seeking Alpha. Retrieved from http://seekingalpha.com/article/890341-the-turnaround-story-that-is-toyota
Harmon, P. (2012). Once more: Lean, the toyota production. BPTrends, Retrieved from http://www.bptrends.com/publicationfiles/advisor20121023.pdf
Enterprise value - ev. Investopedia, Retrieved from http://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/enterprisevalue.asp
Market watch. (2014, March 19). Retrieved from http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/tm/financials
Tabuchi, H., & Vlasic, B. (2014, February 4). In rapid turnaround, toyota is on track to post record earnings. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/05/business/international/toyota-forecasts-record-profit.html?_r=0
Standard & Poor’s. General Motors (GM). (1999) Standard Corporation Descriptions. (pp. 6000 – 6003) New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Corporations keep various types of financial records and it is the responsibility of managers to make sure that the records are maintained and resolved at the end of the fiscal year. Most company has shareholders that want a year-end account on how the company has done and with a projection of what the company is capable of doing in the future. The shareholders have a vested interest and want to be kept informed on how the company is doing financially. Financial records for major corporations are public knowledge and this paper is comparing Target and Wal-Mart and their financial standings.
GM had experienced a level of success that developed a reputation as the world’s preeminent producer of automotive products. Because of its success, which produced substantial fiscal resources, the company was awash in cash flow, cash reserve, and lines of credit. GM’s management was the victim of 50 years of industry success. Management was characterized by a bloated, bureaucratic structure that impeded any attempt to improve the corporation. Top management established a fixed objective in the closed decision-making process towards GM’s strategic objectives. There was little to create a realistic Gap analysis, which made is easy to overlook the need to reinvent its management before undertaking the reinvention of the entire corporation.
Achieving world class business performance is a major challenge in today’s society. Manufacturing companies continue to face increased competition and globalization from its competitors. (1, p. 148). The automotive industry is one of the most volatile manufacturing industries that we have, which was evident in the 2008 – 2010 automotive industry crisis. (2) This global financial downturn served notice to the American automotive manufactures to raise the bar, in order to achieve word class business performance. General Motors, one of the country’s largest automotive manufactures, had to receive a government bailout to survive. During this time many with the corporation asked themselves, if we were a world class business, would we be facing this pending crisis. The answer was a resounding “NO”. General Motors has come out of bankruptcy and is focused on being a world-class business organization.
Any successful business owner or investor is constantly evaluating the performance of the companies they are involved with, comparing historical figures with its industry competitors, and even with successful businesses from other industries. To complete a thorough examination of any company's effectiveness, however, more needs to be looked at than the easily attainable numbers like sales, profits, and total assets. Luckily, there are many well-tested ratios out there that make the task a bit less daunting. Financial ratio analysis helps identify and quantify a company's strengths and weaknesses, evaluate its financial position, and shows potential risks. As with any other form of analysis, financial ratios aren't definitive and their results shouldn't be viewed as the only possibilities. However, when used in conjuncture with various other business evaluation processes, financial ratios are invaluable. By examining Ford Motor Company's financial ratios, along with a few other company factors, this report will give a clear picture of how the company is doing now and should do in the future.
Supply Chain Digest, 2010. Supply Chain News: Is “Lean” to Blame for Toyota’s Recall Issues?
Strategic management Toyota case study. 2013. Strategic management Toyota case study. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.slideshare.net/ArioArdianto/strategic-management-toyota-case-study-27410014. [Accessed 15 December 2013].
Through Dupont analysis, we have been able to see the specific strengths and weaknesses of BMW and Audi’s management. BMW’s lower profit margin and asset turnover indicate less efficient cost management and asset management. Their debt multiplier indicates that they’re taking advantage of debt, but the benefit of this isn’t realized because of their problems with cost and asset management. Due to Audi’s more efficient use of their assets, and better cost efficiency, it can be said that their management has performed better than BMW’s over the past year.
Wailgum, T. (2005, April 15). Toyota's Big Fix: An IS Department Turnaround. Retrieved from www.cio.com: http://www.cio.com/article/110851/Toyota_s_Big_Fix_An_IS_Department_Turnaround
These issues led to Toyota losing much of its brand equity as a leader in safety. According to an article in Time Magazine from February 2010, the automaker didn't just have safety issues in 2009 that led to the recalls, there had been smaller recalls for similar issues nearly every year since 2002. Historically, Toyota has been an organization that can take problems, root out their cause and turn the solutions into advantages over competitors. In this case, Toyota's complete lack of crisis management led to a major loss for the company both in 2009-2010 sales but something more precious and long-term, brand equity.
Toyota's mission is aligned with the needs of their stakeholders - to a degree. Toyota mission is in line with long-standing philosophies; they have designed their mission to supersede short-range decisions. Toyota's philosophical principle is to "work, grow, and align" the enterprise in the direction of a universal rationale, which to the Toyota Motor Corporation states is "bigger than making money" (Toyota, 2010). According to Jim Press, the C.O.O. of Toyota Sales North America and Executive VP, Toyota's chief purpose is not to see a corporate gain, or for the stakeholders to see their portfolio's grow; the purpose of Toyota is to "reinvest in the future so that Toyota can continue to do business; as well as give back to the communities in which we do business" (Ramusson, 2008). Toyota uses this idealism as the basis for all its principles. So, while the stakeholders do make money, it is not the prima...
The nonmanufacturing companies can learn and apply from Toyota’s philosophy and practices as listed below:
Toyota’s uses both differentiation and low cost as generic strategies to try and gain a competitive advantage over their competitors in the automotive industry. The market scope that Toyota uses is a broad one that encompasses nearly every type of customer that is in the market to purchase an automobile. Toyota is able to target such a large market because they have something for everyone. Toyota has four wheel drive trucks and SUVs for the outdoor types or those who live in areas that face severe weather conditions, hybrid models like the Prius for the eco-friendly customers that are interested in saving the environment, along with the standard cars for general, everyday use. Additionally, Toyota provides vehicles for all price ranges.
Toyota Motor Corporation is one of the largest automakers in the world. At its annual conference in Tokyo on May 8, 2008, the company announced that activities through March 2008 generated a sales figure of $252.7 billion, a new record for the company. However, the company is lowering expectations for the coming year due to a stronger yen, a slowing American economy, and the rising cost of raw materials (Rowley, 2008). If Toyota is to continue increasing its revenue, it must examine its business practice and determine on a course of action to maximize its profit.
Toyota Motor Corporation is a very successful automobile manufacturer that is recognized globally. They have continued to obtain and retain a competitive advantage over their counterparts, despite recalls over many years. Regardless of recalls, Toyota has been quick to rectify their shortcomings and continue to lead within the automotive industry with their innovative measures. In this essay, I will discuss key internal factors for Toyota. Within those factors will include Toyota’s core competencies, which are what they do really well in comparison to their competition, three of their strength’s, which will include their posture within the automobile market and their heavy focus on research and development, and two of their