Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Argument essay for gay marriage
Argument essay for gay marriage
Issue of gay marriages
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Argument essay for gay marriage
In the last 45 years gay groups have been fighting with mainstream America in order to gain the right to enjoy the same rights as all other Americans. In the last ten years they have been fighting for their right to join in marriage. The individual States are left to determine the laws that govern this situation. Gays and other liberals feel that they have a right to join together in harmony, while the conservative groups in the United States fight this position adamantly. We will look at the arguments for both sides, to determine which side has a strongest argument.
Advocates for the Homosexual Marriages have argued that by not allowing the homosexual marriages to occur, gays are having their religious freedoms denied. The groups get this argument from the First Amendment of the Constitution that states, which states that a person’s religious views or lack thereof must be protected. Marriage is a secular activity; the government cannot start making laws just because religion says they should. The argument hits home directly accusing the states of violating the group’s First Amendment rights of the gay population. If the federal government would back out of this debate, then homosexual marriages could blossom. They feel that the federal government has over stepped its bounds, allowing the states to uphold this law. (Messerli, n.d.).
The advocates feel that by passing these laws to allow homosexual marriage, family values will not be weakened. They are saying that allowing homosexuals to marry will result in the world being a better place. They feel that society will not only continue to exist, but it will continue to thrive. They reference a study that was published on April 13, 2009 in Social Scie...
... middle of paper ...
...s to make it pleasing for every man and women in the United States. There will be a price to pay for this when we all meet our maker.
Works Cited
Messerli, J. (n.d.). Should Same-Sex Marriages be legalized? Retrieved from http://www.balancedpolitics.org/same_sex_marriages.htm
Procon. Org (2104). Gay Marriage. Retrieved from http://gaymarriage.procon.org/#Background
Wyk, S.V. (2013). Voices Pro and Con Ring out as Supreme Court Weighs Gay Marriage. Retrieved from http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/mar/26/voices-pro-con-ring-out-court-weighs-gay-marriage/?page=all
Webb, R.A. (2014). Overview of Same Sex Marriage in the U.S.: The Struggle for Civil Rights and Equality. Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/diversity/lgb/062005.asp
Same Sex Marriage Laws. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/same-sex-marriage-laws.aspx
Thomas B. Stoddard’s “Gay Marriages: Make Them Legal” is a successfully written argument with some minor flaws in technique. Stoddard uses this article to present his major claim, or central thesis, on the reasons gay marriage should be legalized. He presents his argument using minor claims. In a lecture on February 2, 2005, James McFadden stated a minor claim is the secondary claim in an argument. Stoddard uses minor claims in his discussion of homosexual people being denied their rights by the government and by others who discriminate against them. He also discusses how love and the desire for commitment play a big part in the argument for and against gay marriage.
Abstract On June 26, 2015 a divided Supreme Court ruled in the landmark case Obergefell v. Hodges that same-sex couples could now marry nationwide. At the time of the split ruling there were 9 supreme court justices, 5 of the justices were Republicans, and the remaining 4 were Democrats. In high profile cases it is except that the justices will vote along party lines. When the 5-4 ruling was reveled by the following statement. “It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right (Corn,2015).” written by
...ist then goes on to cite the research that it described as suffering from “serious methodological problems” for its next two points. The list points to low birthrates in countries where same-sex marriage is legal, as though it can prove in that way that allowing LGBT couples to marry decreases the number of children born in a country.
For some background, this case escalated to the Supreme Court since several groups of same-sex couples from different states, sued state agencies when their marriage was refused to be recognized. As it escalated through appeals, the plaintiffs argued that the states were violating the Equal Protection clause and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Equal Protection, according to the Constitution refers to the fact that, “any State [shall not] deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law…” (23). The opposition of this case was that, 1) The Constitution does not address same-sex marriage as a policy, and 2) The sovereignty of states regarding the decision. Ultimately, and according to the Oyez project, the Court held that “[the Amendment] guarantees the right to marry as one of the fundamental liberties it protects, and that analysis applies to same-sex couples,” and therefore, same-sex marriage is a fundamental liberty.
History has showed us that marriage helped stabilize heterosexual couple’s along with same-sex couple’s relationships and that same-sex couples can provide just as loving and protecting of a household for a child as would a heterosexual couple would. Many heterosexual parents raise their children with the same amount of love and care as any heterosexual couple
AFTER GAY MARRIAGE, what will become of marriage itself? Will same-sex matrimony extend marriage's stabilizing effects to homosexuals? Will gay marriage undermine family life? A lot is riding on the answers to these questions. But the media's reflexive labeling of doubts about gay marriage as homophobia has made it almost impossible to debate the social effects of this reform. Now with the Supreme Court's ringing affirmation of sexual liberty in Lawrence v. Texas, that debate is unavoidable.
(357) Especially considering the changes made for the gay and lesbian community involvement in legalized marriage since this article was written in the July 5, 2004 issue of the Nation. This goes to prove to me that Moody’s prediction was accurate in assuming great changes were right around the corner in the development of marriage. I am further convinced of the advancement of homosexual marriage and believe that in the very near future there will be marriage equality for all. Allowing homosexuals the same rights as heterosexuals will benefit everyone simply by creating us all once again equal. This will create protection for all family units with
Wolf, Richard. “Timeline: Same-Sex marriage through the years.” USA Today, Gannett Satellite Information Network, 26 June 2015,
... if? The legal consequences of marriage and the legal needs of lesbian and gay male couples. Michigan Law review. Nov.1996. Pg. 447-491. http://www.jstor.org.remote.baruch.cuny.edu/stable/1290119?seq=1&uid=3739664&uid=2134&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21103079482127
Society is created with both homosexual and heterosexual individuals. Previously when certain laws discriminated against others, such as law for women's rights to vote, these laws were changed. Changing the traditions of the country does not mean that it will lead to the legalization of other extreme issues. Each ...
middle of paper ... ... Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(5), 975-981. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.62.5.975 SLB Networks. a. The adage of the adage of the adage of the adage of the adage of the adage of the adage of the adage of the adage of the adage of the adage of the ad The divorce law center: About divorce.
2005 The Marriage Ordeal: Rights and Ramifications. In a country with it’s fundamentals based on liberty and equality, America has always struggled with those very concepts. Throughout history, Americans have been challenged to make decisions that have oppressed and freed certain groups of people. The political fight for same-sex marriages is a perfect example of this notion. This relationship between spouses has created a major controversy that is creating history in our nation.
We live in a very controversial time when it comes to same sex marriages. This issue is one of the most widely discussed controversies along with what rights they deserve and what rights they should be denied. Straight people have very opposing beliefs on this topic, some believe gays are given far too few rights and should be granted ultimate freedom while others believe gays already have enough rights and the debate should end now. This is why our nation is so at war with this issue. The research found explains if marital and family status influence same sex marriages, gay rights, laws on marriage, the strength of gay marriage, and how the government is working to expand gay marriage rights.
Stoddard, T, Fein, B, (Jan. 1990) Gay Marriage, Personal relationships, Marriage, Legislation, Homosexuality, American Bar Association, (Pages 42, 42)
In conclusion I argue that banning same-sex marriage is discriminatory. It is discriminatory because it denies homosexuals the many benefits received by heterosexual couples. The right to marriage in the United States has little to do with the religious and spiritual meaning of marriage. It has a lot to do with social justice, extending a civil right to a minority group. This is why I argue for same-sex marriage. The freedom to marry regardless of gender preference should be allowed.