One of the more controversial debates in today’s political arena, especially around election times, is that of felon disenfranchisement. The disenfranchisement of felons, or the practice of denying felons and ex-felons the right to vote, has been in practice before the colonization of America and traces back to early England; however, it has not become so controversial and publicized until recent times. “In today’s political system, felons and ex-felons are the only competent adults that are denied the right to vote; the total of those banned to vote is approximately 4.7 million men and women, over two percent of the nation’s population” (Reiman 3).
Many people believe that felons do not deserve the right to vote. For these people, voting is not an inherent right; rather it is a privilege given to deserving people that wish to make a positive change to their lives. Some believe that, “…there is no reason for a felon to vote or to debate about whether or not they have that right…they made the choice to break the law, so why should they have any say in making it?” {Siegel} In this point of view, giving felons the right to vote is similar to rewarding them. With the right to vote, felons are still able to sway decisions regarding the lives of a society they are no longer a part of. Felons are meant to be punished, stripped of numerous rights including that of voting. Punishments, then, are made to restrict a person, not give them more freedom and decision.
If felons are allowed to vote, one must consider the effects it would have on the elections. Many people believe that felons make the wrong choices for a reason, that they are clearly lacking something law-abiding citizens have. Professor Christopher Manfredi ...
... middle of paper ...
..., Parole, and Community Corrections. Upper Saddle
River: Prentice Hall, 2005.
Jeffrey Reiman. “Liberal and Republican Arguments Against the Disenfranchisement of
Felons.” Criminal Justice Ethics 24.1 (2005): 3-18. Criminal Justice Periodicals.
ProQuest. Ryan Library, New Rochelle, NY. 13 Dec. 2007.
http://www.proquest.com/.
Losing the Vote. 1998. The Sentencing Project. 11 Jan. 2007.
http://www.hrw.org/reports98/vote/usvot98o.htm.
Siegel, Larry J. Criminology. 8th ed. Lowell: Thomson Wadsworth, 2003.
United States. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics –
2002. Albany: The Hindelang Criminal Justice Research Center, 2003.
United States. Federal Bureau of Investigations. Uniform Crime Reports. Sept. 2007.
12 Feb 2007. http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2006/index.html
Most black Americans are under the control of the criminal justice today whether in parole or probation or whether in jail or prison. Accomplishments of the civil rights association have been challenged by mass incarceration of the African Americans in fighting drugs in the country. Although the Jim Crow laws are not so common, many African Americans are still arrested for very minor crimes. They remain disfranchised and marginalized and trapped by criminal justice that has named them felons and refuted them their rights to be free of lawful employment and discrimination and also education and other public benefits that other citizens enjoy. There is exists discernment in voting rights, employment, education and housing when it comes to privileges. In the, ‘the new Jim crow’ mass incarceration has been described to serve the same function as the post civil war Jim crow laws and pre civil war slavery. (Michelle 16) This essay would defend Michelle Alexander’s argument that mass incarcerations represent the ‘new Jim crow.’
Travis further explains that offenders are denied the right to vote, and even denied student loans. For example, Even though a drug addict has served his sentence and rehabilitates himself, the opportunity to receive higher education to advance himself is denied. He demonstrates how the idea of denying offenders certain rights is not a new concept. In Athens, a penalty of “infamy” denies the individual right to attend public assemblies, hold office, and serve in the army. In the Roman Empire, “Offenders were barred from certain trades” (17), and in Athens, civil death was the
In the United States 2.2 million citizens are incarcerated on felony charges. Laws in America prohibit felons from voting. As a result, on Election Day 5.3 million citizens of America are disenfranchised because of crimes they once committed. Though they once broke the law, they have served their time and have been punished adequately in accordance with the American Justice System. Felons should regain full voting rights after their stint in prison.
Felon voting laws limit the restrictions for a felon to vote on any election. “Felon voting has not been federally regulated because some people argue that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act can be tied to felon disenfranchisement and the Congress has the authority to legislate felon voting in federal elections.” Felon disenfranchisement is excluding people otherwise eligible to vote from voting due to conviction of a criminal offence, usually restricted to the more serious class of crimes, felonies. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures and The Sentencing Project, 1 in 40 adults were unable to vote due to a felony conviction in the 2008 elections. One purpose of the felon voting laws is the uncertainty of trusting
The United States has a larger percent of its population incarcerated than any other country. America is responsible for a quarter of the world’s inmates, and its incarceration rate is growing exponentially. The expense generated by these overcrowded prisons cost the country a substantial amount of money every year. While people are incarcerated for a number of reasons, the country’s prisons are focused on punishment rather than reform, and the result is a misguided system that fails to rehabilitate criminals or discourage crime. The ineffectiveness of the United States’ criminal justice system is caused by mass incarceration of non-violent offenders, racial profiling, and a high rate of recidivism.
Once released from prison, he or she is deemed a felon. Losing the right to vote, not being able to serve on a jury, and inability to enforce his or her second amendment is just a few of the disadvantages of serving time, but this is just the textbook interpretation. There is no much more that is at stake when you step foot behind bars. Once a person gains their freedom the better question to ask is what wasn’t taken form them? Their job if there was one in the first place, their children, their family, and most importantly the part of the person that made them a member of society.
Laws that prohibit felons from voting are a punishment above and beyond the one handed out by the judicial system. There is no uniformity to the laws barring convicted felons from voting. Laws vary. greatly from state to state. Almost every state prevents incarcerated felons from voting.
In recent decades, violent crimes in the United States of America have been on a steady decline, however, the number of people in the United States under some form of correctional control is reaching towering heights and reaching record proportions. In the last thirty years, the incarceration rates in the United States has skyrocketed; the numbers roughly quadrupled from around five hundred thousand to more than 2 million people. (NAACP)In a speech on criminal justice at Columbia University, Hillary Clinton notes that, “It’s a stark fact that the United States has less than five percent of the world’s population, yet we have almost 25 percent of the world’s total prison population. The numbers today are much higher than they were 30, 40
Criminal disenfranchisement is defined as the loss of the right to vote by a person convicted of or sentenced to imprisonment for a felony. Since before the civil war, this practice has been a part of the United States justice system mostly as a means to handle the racial issues with voting but then also in regards to the felons and rebels that participated in the Southern “rebellion” during the Civil War. This practice has recently gained some popularity since a debate has developed as to whether it is unconstitutional or not. Is voting a right or a privilege?
...he right to vote. I made a ten question survey that asked questions about letting convicted felons have the right to vote in major elections throughout America. Thirteen out of thirty high school students said that convicted felons should have the right to vote because they are American citizens. The other seventeen people I surveyed said that they should not have the right to vote because they had their chance to perform correctly in society and failed miserably. As you can now see, I have given you many reasons to see that convicted felons should not have the right to vote. They cannot be trusted with such a responsibility as voting for this country’s next leader.
In most states ex-felons are not allowed to vote. This takes away a large portion of the voting population because of how many ex-felons there are right now and the many more that will be in the future. Ex-felons may also have a very hard time finding a job or a place to live. Legally landlords are allowed to deny an ex-felon. In Carbondale Illinois rental properties owners “Home Rentals” does background checks to make sure that none of their potential renters are felons. If they are felons Home Rentals claims that they will deny them the privilege of living in one of their properties. Ex-felons may also have a hard time finding jobs. Not many employers are willing to employ ex-felons for the fear of more crime or less commitment. Though denying these ex-felons jobs will not help the economy, only giving them jobs can help that.
How is it that ex-felons are not allowed to vote once they have served their time in prison? Why is it that a nation who is considered to be democratic like the United States does not allow ex-felons to vote even after serving time in prison? Meanwhile, other developed and industrialized nations allow their incarcerated population form part of the electorates. Is our criminal justice system objective as we think of it?
The question should felons and ex-felons be allowed to vote is a valid question in our society. It is often thrown back and forth whether these people who have been committed of a crime should be allowed to have the right to vote in the United States. Often in this country the felons or ex-felons have the right to vote, but their right to vote is made more difficult to use because of costs that they have to pay after going to jail and other standards that make in nearly impossible for the felon to accomplish in order to vote. They end up not being able to fulfill their duties of being an American. Conservatives and deliberate democrats have their own opinions on the issue of should felons be able to vote.
The government over the years has granted suffrage to all other citizens over the age of eighteen, regardless of who they are. The purpose of voting is to have a say in how the government is run, and this is one of the core principles of the United States. When the first line of the Federal Constitution starts with “We the people of the Untied States of America,” then that should mean all of the people, and not just people who have not made a mistake. The felons are still required to abide by all of the laws that would apply to anyone else, but do not get the right to be able to change those laws, or the people making them. This is not a fair way to treat the citizens of the country.
“It’s really clear that the most effective way to turn a nonviolent person into a violent one is to send them to prison,” says Harvard University criminologist James Gilligan. The American prison system takes nonviolent offenders and makes them live side-by-side with hardened killers. The very nature of prison, no matter people view it, produces an environment that is inevitably harmful to its residents.