Introduction
Cesare Baccaria was born March 15th 1738 in Milan to an affluent family where he was the eldest of 3 siblings, as a child he was described as reserved and timid but proved to be highly intelligent. He studied at a Jesuit school until his graduation in 1754 Where he went on to pursue his interests in law at Pavia university although he also showed interest in economics and public policy reform. During his studies at Pavia Beccaria befriended two fellows who shared one common interest; reforming the rather medieval “criminal justice system” they warmly named the trio “The Acadamy of Fists’’. In 1758 Beccaria graduated with a degree in law and had since become a prolific essayist for his group’s cause. In 1760 against his father’s wishes Cesare married Therese Di Blasco (age 16), shunned by his family they lived in relative poverty for a few years. Influenced greatly by the academy of fists and the writings of Voltaire, Hobbes, Hume and other “Enlightened” writers, Beccaria published a revolutionary essay about legal reform based on rational and utilitarian principles during the inquisition; when torture and public executions where still the mode. At first well received by the enlightened thinkers of Europe, Beccaria’s treaties “On crime and punishment” was chastised by the Vatican and put on the list of Condemned books in 1764.This text will show that Cesare Baccaria’s writings served as the basis for legal reform throughout the western world.
On crime and Punishment (Major work)
Beccarria’s avant grade treaties “On Crime and Punishment’’ published anonymously in 1764, laid out the groundwork for the modern western criminal justice system. His essay touched on many topics such as penology, social reform...
... middle of paper ...
...ne may conclude that Cesare Beccaria’s work has had a direct and lasting impact on our criminal justice system.Lastly, His principles for the structure of the criminal justice system, legal procedure and sentencing are apparent in the Canadian criminal justice system.
References
Beccaria, C. (1764) Essay on Crimes and Punishments. Translated by H. Paollucci. New York (1985).
Gibbs, J. P. (1968). Crime, punishment and deterrence. Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, 48, 515–530.
Groenewegen, P. (2002). Eighteenth-Century Economics: Turgot, Beccaria and Smith and their
Contemporaries. London: Routledge
Maestro, M. (1973) Cesare Beccaria and the Origins of Penal Reform. Temple University press,
Philidelphia
Monachesi, Elio. (1983) Journal of Criminology & Police science. Pionners in Criminology IX
Cesare Beccaria 11,4 p. 317-326
“The Ordinary of Newgate’s Account” document discusses the themes of crimes and punishment from this course, by giving an insight into the penitence of those who are condemned to death in the Newgate Prison. The focus will be on the crimes that the prisoners committed, the connection of sin and crimes, and proper penitential behavior. In England during the eighteenth century, religion played an important part of people’s lives due to the reason that it provided a moral and behavioral structure. The concept of original sin and the temptation of the devil played heavily in people’s minds. This was one of the explanations why crime happened in England until it shifted from the devil to idleness as a reason why it happened. Prayer played a significant
...sent in the justice system. Through comparison, Miakaelsen proves that healing must be a sector of concentration in justice, if society aims to retrograde the complications created by a crime. As a result of punishment being a fixation in justice, legislation is directly contributing to detriment of our society. By remaining focused on punishment, our governance is failing to erase the taint crime inflicts upon our nescient society. As citizens, we must manifest together to demonstrate our support for justice which focuses on restoration, rather than retribution. Otherwise, with solely punitive measures in place, this cycle of lawlessness will remain incessant. Is this reality of harsh discipline still acceptable if there is no obvious benefit from these methods?
What would the criminal justice system be without punishment? Perhaps, the criminal justice system would not serve a function or cease to exist. Punishment is one of the main facets of the criminal justice system. It holds such significance that it even reflects the beliefs and values of a particular society. Fyodor Dostoyevsky (1821-1881) once said “The degree of civilization in a society can be judged by entering its prisons.” (Pollock, 2010: 315). Punishment has been around since the beginning of civilization. With its rich history, the concept of punishment has been analyzed by some of the most renowned theorists, some of which include Jeremy Bentham, Cesare Beccaria, Adolphe Quetelet and André-Michel Guerry (Pollock, 2010: 318). Once found guilty of an offense the type of punishment must be determined. There are many different rationales used to answer why it is necessary to inflict punishment. Rationales for punishment include retribution, prevention, treatment and rehabilitation. To better understand these rationales ethical systems such as utilitarianism, ethical formalism and ethics of care can be used. The general public should be knowledgeable about punishment, even more so should professionals in the criminal justice field because they are directly linked to it in some way.
By the turn of the sixteenth century, the Italian Renaissance had produced writers such as Danté, Petrarch, Boccaccio and Castiglione, each with ideas rooted in the revival of Greek and Roman Classics, localization of the Christian traditions, idealistic opinions of women and individualism. From these authors spread the growth of the humanistic movement which encompassed the entirety of the Italian rebirth of arts and literature. One among many skeptics, including Lorenzo Valla, who had challenged the Catholic Church fifty years earlier in proving the falsity of the Donation of Constantine, Niccolò Machiavelli projected his ideas of fraudulence into sixteenth century Italian society by suggesting that rulers could only maintain power through propaganda, as seen with the success of Ferdinand of Aragon in Spain circa 1490. Today, the coined term Machiavellian refers to duplicity in either politics or self-advancement. Unlike most philosophers of the sixteenth century, Machiavelli wrote from the perspective of an anti-Humanist; he criticized not only the Classics and the Catholic Church, but also encouraged the deceitful use of religion and hated the humanist concepts of liberty, peace and individualism.1
The governance of our present day public and social order co-exist within the present day individual. Attempts to recognize the essentiality of equality in hopes of achieving an imaginable notion of structure and order, has led evidence based practitioners such as Herbert Packer to approach crime and the criminal justice system through due process and crime control. A system where packer believed in which ones rights are not to be infringed defrauded or abused was to be considered to be the ideal for procedural fairness. “I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.” Thomas Jefferson pg 9 cjt To convict an individual because proper consideration was not taken will stir up social unrest rather then it’s initial intent, when he or she who has committed the crime is not punished for their doings can cause for a repetition and even collaboration with other’s for a similar or greater crime.
An Italian by the name of Cesare Beccaria also discussed society, but more in terms of social control and matters of crime and punishment. He was an opponent of torture, capital punishment, and of any punishment that was done to excess or didn’t fit the crime that warranted it. He arrived at his conclusions through the logic that was so popular of the day. An excellent example of this logic is in this phrase concerning capitol punishment: “Is it not absurd, that the laws, which detest and punish homicide, should, in order to prevent murder, publicly commit murder themselves?” Rational arguments such as these permeated Enlightened conversations and didn’t fail to be noticed by many of the great national rule...
This paper will focus on Capital Punishment, which we will define as execution through means of lethal injection administered by an executioner to someone convicted of murder, and for the purpose of this paper murder will be established as killing an innocent person in cold blood. It will concern the dehumanization of the condemned and the inappropriateness of employing the same morality and ethicality to someone who in the eyes of the public have lost all humaneness. Dehumanization will be, for the sake of my argument, classified as depriving someone from his humanity, and by depriving them of humanness, which is essential to ethics; we fracture the foundation of morality and ethics because without humans there is no morality or ethicality. I will argue that Capital Punishment undermines ethical and moral foundations in particular Kant’s theories by dehumanizing the condemned, therefore, opposing ethical arguments supporting Capital Punishment by making morality and ethicality inapplicable to someone who has had his humanity denied to him. I will first outline the various reasons in how the condemned is stripped of their humanity by demonstrating how it violates the value of life and how using it as revenge and as a deterrent of other crimes goes against Kant’s “Practical Imperative” which states that no human being should be seen as a means to an end because this essentially strips him of the right to live for himself. I will also show how Kant’s ethical theory regarding Capital Punishment, in which he indicates that taking a human life should always be punished by taking the offenders life, has contradictions especially in respect to the head of state where the same rules do not apply to them (Avaliani). The authorities are ...
Renaissance Italy was full of famous powerful families: The Medici who ruled Florence, the Sforza ruled Milan and Forli. But out of all of them, the Borgia Family were the most famous and infamous that have ever graced the pages of history. The Borgia’s are a fascination to study because history is so divided over them. They used the power of the Catholic Church for their own personal fortune and political power. They were rumored to have committed every sin and vice under the sun. Many in their time period believed that they were mass poisoners. Yet at the same time, their sins paralleled those of most the nobility and royalty of that age, including previous popes. The Borgia’s presided over some of the most important events of the times; the Bonfire of the Vanities, the Spanish inquisition, the expulsion of the Jews from Spain, the Italian Wars, and, Treaty of Tordesillas. They can also be traced to the beginnings of the Protestant Reformation. This paper tells of the Borgia’s rise and fall in the Papacy and their deeds and impact on the world at the time.
As an Italian lawyer and legal philosopher, he saw the then-actual criminal law as a messy jumble of laws, customs, and traditions that were being derived from ancient Roman and German cultures. This traditional law included criminal justice practices such as the use of torture to secure a confession and capital punishment. Beccaria not only believed that these methods were erratic, but ineffective. He also believed that these practices did not serve the public to its greatest potential of justice. Beccaria’s desired goal was to rationalize this jumble of laws into a uniform system that demonstrated the spirit of innovation and consistency, with principle and predictability. He would then publish the influential treatise, On Crime and Punishment, in 1764. He believed that those who abused the judicial system of its powers, did not serve the greatest good of the public. Arguments such as, justice being executed among the public, judicial torture being eradicated and deemed as inhumane, and how the accused should have a presumption of innocence until proven guilty; would be of the included within the
The 19th century reform movement made a valuable impact on the future of the criminal justice system by rationalizing laws, civilizing punishments, and introducing prevention and rehabilitation. Nevertheless many of the developments had design flaws and were altered to accommodate growing needs. Today many problems still exist within the criminal justice system and reformers are still making efforts to reduce crime and improve rehabilitation.
The aim of this lesson will be to develop students understanding of crime and punishment in Medieval Europe. As outlined in AUSVELS, this will include investigating different kinds of crime and punishment utilised and the ways the nature of crime and punishment has either stayed the same throughout history, or changed over time.
Beginning in the eighteenth or nineteenth century, the nature of punishment began to change. Slowly, the spectacle of justice which accompanied the public executions and torture of the Middle Ages began to recede farther and farther away from the public into the fringes of society as the institution of the prison began to take shape. Hidden by both distance and structure, the large stone/concrete walls and small windows kept the real...
McLaughlin and Muncie (2012) in their work indicate that “crime is not a self-evident and unitary concept. Its constitution is diverse, historically relative and continually contested.” With this statement, the authors are describing crime as something which is not unique but, on the contrary, it is a fairly normal and widespread event. Moreover, they are stating that crime depends on time and culture and it is shaped by morality and social attitudes. Crime can be linked to different areas such as economics, social status and geography. In this essay, different themes will be discussed: for instance, the main ones are the history of crime, the different types of crime, how to measure crime and the various ideas of crime in different parts of the world.
The Law today is a summary of various principles from around the world from the past and the present. Early practises of law were the foundation of the law that we know and abide by today. These practises were referred to as the Classical school. Over time however, different criminologist have altered and greatly improved the early, incomplete ideas and made them more complete and practical to more modern times. This newer version is referred to as the Positivist school. This rapid change from the classical to the positivist perspective was due to the change and growth of civilization. Even though one perspective came from another, they are still different in many ways and it is evident when relating them to section 462.37, Forfeiture of Proceeds of Crime, and section 810, Sureties to keep the Peace. The Classical School of criminology’s time of dominance was between 1700 and 1800. Its conception of deviance was that deviance was a violation of the social contract. Classical theorists believed that all individuals were rational actors and they were able to act upon their own free will. A person chose to commit crimes because of greed and because they were evil. The primary instrument that could be used in regards to the classical school to control crime was to create “criminal sanctions that instil fear of punishment in those contemplating criminal acts” (Gabor 154). Classical school theorists believed the best defence was a good offence and therefore they wanted to instil so much fear into people about what would happen to them if they were to commit a crime that even those who were only thinking of committing a crime were impacted greatly. The classical school individuals operated entirely on free will and it was their ...
The Classical School of Criminology generally refers to the work of social contract and utilitarian philosophers Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham during the enlightenment in the 18th century. The contributions of these philosophers regarding punishment still influence modern corrections today. The Classical School of Criminology advocated for better methods of punishment and the reform of criminal behaviour. The belief was that for a criminal justice system to be effective, punishment must be certain, swift and in proportion to the crime committed. The focus was on the crime itself and not the individual criminal (Cullen & Wilcox, 2010). This essay will look at the key principles of the Classical School of Criminology, in particular