Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Character of Claudius
In this essay we are going to discuss whether Claudius was an effective ruler. In order to achieve an answer to this, we will also discuss how he governed his empire and how he went about administrating laws and provinces.
To start with, however, it is best to briefly introduce Claudius before he became emperor. This will help us to understnad his situation and how past events effected his ruling.
Claudius was the great nephew of Augustus, and so was part of the most important family in rome at the time. From a young age Claudius was physically and mentally challenged, and due to this he was the out cast of his family, everyone including Augustus believed him to be an embaressment. Augustus also done him no favours, he didn’t give him any ‘honours except a seat in the college of augurs and listed him in his will among heirs in the third degree.’ Claudius was then forced to socialise with slaves and freedmen, which is unusual because of his status within the family. Claudius was also unable to enter a career as a political magistrate, firstly because he was unable to perform the required ten years of military service due to his incapabilities. However, Claudius eventually, and unexpectedly, became emperor after his nephew and previous emperor, Gaius, was assassinated. Claudius was taken straight to the Praetorian barracks and was proclaimed emperor.
So, now we see how Claudius lived his life before and also how he unexpectedly took the role of emperor. Now, in order to discuss whether Claudius was a successful emperor, it is best to follw on from what was mentioned earlier. Claudius, from a young age, socialised with freedmen and slaves, both of these being the lowest socially ranked people in rome. Once Claudius...
... middle of paper ...
...lso, it seems, unable to make the distinction between his authority and the senates, and he began to encroach on the senates authority quite often. Claudius would one minute attempt to please the senate, for example, he gave the senate back the provinces of Macedonia and Achaia, and then anger the senate with his administrative laws, and he simple minded attacks on senators themselves. Claudius’ reign was full of misconceived tasks in his aim to make an impact, but rather he angered senatrors and equites with his simple mindedness, and attacks on their established way of life.
Finally, If we weigh up Claudius’ successes and failures, we see that he was an effective emperor, the good and effective things that he done for his people and his military success, out weigh his failure with the senate and the upper class, which in all fairness, didn’t hinder his ruling.
From ages past, the actions of conquerors, kings and tyrants had brought the Roman Republic to a stance that opposed any idea of a singular leader, of a single man that held total power over the entirety of the state. Their rejection of the various ruthless Etruscan rulers that had previously dictated them brought the Republic to existence in 509 BC , and as a republic their prominence throughout the provinces of the world exponentially expanded. Throughout these years, the traditions of the Romans changed to varying degrees, most noticeably as a result of the cultural influence that its subject nations had upon the republic, as well as the ever-changing nature of Roman society in relation to then-current events. However, it was not until the rise of Augustus, the first of a long line of succeeding emperors, that many core aspects of the Republic were greatly changed. These were collectively known as the “Augustan Reforms”, and consisted of largely a variety of revisions to the social, religious, political, legal and administrative aspects of the republic’s infrastructure. Through Augustus, who revelled in the old traditional ways of the past, the immoral, unrestraint society that Rome was gradually falling to being was converted to a society where infidelities and corruption was harshly looked upon and judged. The Roman historian Suetonius states, “He corrected many ill practices, which, to the detriment of the public, had either survived the licentious habits of the late civil wars, or else originated in the long peace” . Through Augustus and his reforms, the Republic was transformed into an Empire, and through this transformation, Rome experienced one of its greatest and stabl...
He uses the people he is closest with as puppets to get what he wants. This can be explained using principles of behavior economics. Through priming, Claudius uses people so that he can cover himself up and maintain a good look to the people while he has his followers do his dirty work. The first instance in which Claudius uses priming to get what he wants is in Act 2 of Shakespeare 's Hamlet, Claudius uses two old school chums Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to come to Elsinore and spy on Hamlet and report his every move to Claudius (2.4.40-41). According to Ariely, people are willing to work for free, and they are willing to work for a reasonable wage (234).
Claudius’s Decision to Invade Britain in AD43 as Motivated by a Desire to Emulate Julius Caesar
The Senate was a danger to Claudius and he refused to enter the house of the Senate during the first thirty days of his reign. By removing and abolishing treason trials, and Caligula’s tax reforms, he sought to gain their support. Although Claudius was a successful ruler, he was easily persuaded by many closest to him, most importantly, his fourth wife Agrippina (Rome: The Autobiography). Messalina was Claudius’ third wife and they had a son named Britannicus, who was to be the heir of the throne when Claudius died.
Livius, Titus. The Early History of Rome. Trans. Aubrey De Sélincourt. London: Penguin Group, 2002. N. pag. Print.
...e was outstanding as he was coherent to Augustus’ policy and kept the provinces content by governing them well. The financial status of the Empire was boosted 20 times that at his accession by building highways and saving money through hosting less games and repairing buildings. Tiberius followed in Augustus’ steps and made a respectful relationship with the Senate by showing courtesy to the consuls and the body as a whole. The rise of Sejanus prove devastating to Tiberius’ rule as his execution fueled Tacitus’ claim of a ‘reign of terror’ and angered the people of Rome. However, in his last years he did not let the administration of the Empire fall into appears. Through analysis of Tiberius’ rule, it is clearly seen that he treated the senate fairly, created strong economics and security in the state and boosted the empire into an unprecedented state of prosperity.
He says this is normal in a system of checks and balances, in which all three forms of government check and balance each other out, but in reality the people had less power than the other two. This is due to the fact that the Senate, to quote, “can do those who manage state-owned property a great deal of harm or a great deal of good, since it has the final say on all these matter” (Polybius 6.16). It can be drawn that it is in the best interest of the people not to act solely in their interests, but rather the interests of the Senate given the fact that they can ruin their lives. Polybius expands and says that by taking this into consideration, everyone is faced with the possibility they may one day need the Senate’s help and thus it is in their best interest not to frustrate or oppose it, and the same goes for opposing consuls, due to the fact that everyone falls under their authority when on campaign (Polybius 6.16). It is clear to one analyzing this that although the masses and assemblies did have great powers in theory, they were not able to act on their own interests as stated above. The common people may have had great power, but said power came with extreme limitations of acting in the interests of those above them, so it can be drawn that although the people did have a role in the political process, said role was to act in the
Emperor Nero, infamously known as one of the most malevolent, oppressive, and tyrannical leader throughout history, was the last ruler of the Julio-Claudian Dynasty. He was born outside Rome in Antium and his mother married his great uncle, Emperor Claudius, in order for her son to be the next Emperor of Rome. It wasn’t apparent that her son was to become one of the most feared and cruel leaders in Roman history from 54 CE to 68 CE. By examining his achievements and failures as an emperor, his influences and changes over the entire economic, political and social spectrum are revealed.
Augustus created the office of emperor with the Augustan Principate, which was “to have no institutionalized authoritarian power, no perpetual dictatorship such as Julius Caesar had had himself voted early in 44, or anything like it (Stockton, 124).” Despite his wishes the people of Rome ended up giving Augustus eternal office, and powers to control the Senate with the rights to dictate agendas and veto (Stockton, 128). The people of Rome had created a position of absolute power, the exact thing Augustus was attempting to prevent. At the time the people of Rome could not have realized what they were creating in the office of emperor, for Augustus was a great man whose leadership created a great shadow over the shoulder of any future emperor.
Tiberius Sempronius and Gaius Sempronius Gracchus were born into one of Rome’s most politically connected families of their generation. This in turn, benefitted both of their short controversial political careers. Tiberius Gracchus, the eldest of the two, was described by Florus as “a man who easily stood out from others in birth, appearance and eloquence...” (n.d., p. 221) and Velleius identified Tiberius as being the epitome of perfection (p. 55). These sources, created nearly 100 years after the death of Tiberius Gracchi, describe Tiberius to be the ‘perfect’ human-being which could demonstrate a bias accou...
Claudius is also a character who is neither true to himself nor to others: he is not being true to the rest of the kingdom. He does not want to give up his gains, so the people of Denmark do not know why their previous King has died and his brother taken over. While making an attempt to pray, he realizes that his sins cannot be forgiven.
...ns his messengers they had “no further personal power to business with the King” than his articles allowed (1.2). This limitation reveals Claudius’ rigid authoritativeness. Thus, Claudius’ flamboyant use of language and his diplomatic foreign policy reveal his strong leadership qualities.
Claudius is a villain because of his enormous greed, his overwhelming selfishness and his use of intelligence for evil purposes.
Claudius is a very deceptive king who tries to bend his appearance throughout the play in order to accommodate for his unfortunate reality. He is an appalling, hypocritical king incapable of running his own kingdom. Unfortunately, Claudius is able to deceive others around him, and creates an illusion of being a great king. In the novel, he is able to stop young Fortinbras from attacking Denmark; only after much pleading and supplication to Fortingbra’s uncle though. Nevertheless, Claudius knows that he is a dreadful king “and from his lips we get the true explanation, he discloses the fact that young Fortinbras has no wholesome fear and respect for him as he had for the late king” (Crawford). Furthermore, Claudius has a dishonest lifestyle that differentiates him from a true king. As the great Shakespearean scholar Alexander W. Crawford explains, “The king led the way in dissipation and debauchery” a life in which Claudius only lives to play, never to rule. Above all, deception pours from Claudius when he kills his own brother, the late King Hamlet. Up u...
King Claudius, as illustrated in Shakespeare’s Hamlet, displays both charm and eloquence. Claudius is an intelligent person and is able to deceive people into believing he is innocent and morally guided. He is adept at manipulating people in order to advance and maintain his own power and fails to show any remorse for his actions. Claudius utilizes his linguistic skills to portray himself as an innocent and prudent leader; however, upon further inspection his diction is a mere smoke screen that hides his manipulative and cunning nature.