Explaination of Horse Culture in Plains Indians Summaries by Hämäläinen

1461 Words3 Pages

I. Introduction
In the introduction, Hämäläinen introduces how Plains Indians horse culture is so often romanticized in the image of the “mounted warrior,” and how this romanticized image is frequently juxtaposed with the hardships of disease, death, and destruction brought on by the Europeans. It is also mentioned that many historians depict Plains Indians equestrianism as a typical success story, usually because such a depiction is an appealing story to use in textbooks. However, Plains Indians equestrianism is far from a basic story of success. Plains equestrianism was a double-edged sword: it both helped tribes complete their quotidian tasks more efficiently, but also gave rise to social issues, weakened the customary political system, created problems between other tribes, and was detrimental to the environment.
Hämäläinen goes on to explain that his purpose is to trace and analyze the contradictions of the Plains Indians’ horse culture, rather than just condemning it as something baleful, which many historians tend to do. Hämäläinen also refutes the common eastern farmer-western nomad manner of analyzing Plains equestrianism, in which there is “a tendency to cast the villagers as cultural reactionaries who failed to embrace the liberating powers of equestrianism and, locked in space and time, were crushed by the double invasion of the aggressive nomads and the encroaching Americans,” (Hämäläinen, 2) and instead proposes that Plains horse culture is understood from a latitudinal --rather than longitudinal-- viewpoint, since horse culture spread from the south, northwards. It is also explained that the latitudinal spread of equestrianism gave rise to the creation of markedly diverse horse cultures, vary...

... middle of paper ...

...slaved. Furthermore, equestrian-provoked warfare transformed northern Mexico into a dangerous backcountry that eased American takeover of the Southwest.
Also, equestrianism began to transform the social hierarchies of Plains tribes: social class was determined by the quantity of horses one owned, --which runs parallel to the social pyramid of the Antebellum South, in which quantity of slaves a plantation owner would often reflect his wealth and influence-- and the means of which one acquired horses. Additionally, ownership of horses, or lack thereof often determined whether or not a man could marry, and being unable to marry due to lack of horses often emasculated the Plains men.
However, the issues that the southern Plains tribes faced did not end there: intensive pastoralism brought on negative environmental impacts that led to the decline of the bison population.

Open Document