Exclusion of The Crucible Act Ⅱ Scene 2

769 Words2 Pages

In Act Ⅱ Scene 2 of The Crucible, a 1953 play by the Arthur Miller, Abigail Williams, the antagonist, meets John Proctor, the protagonist, in the forest at night, where John asks Abigail to free his wife in court the next day, or otherwise he will expose their affair in public to ruin her. This fast-paced short scene portrays Abigail as pious and possessed, which contradicts the impression given by previous scenes. Most importantly, the scene reveals the crucial plan of Proctor which he is planning to use to take down Abigail. By excluding the scene, Miller eliminates the unfavourable danger of jeopardizing the credibility of the characters due to the inconsistency of descriptions, heightens the dramatic effect when Proctor confesses in Act Ⅲ, and prevents the readers from being misled by the affection Abigail has displayed in the scene. At first glance, there does not seem to be an obvious reason for deleting the scene. But when one pays close attention to the language, both physical and verbal, of the protagonist and antagonist, one can easily notice that there is a discrepancy between this scene and the rest of the play. When Abigail questions him if he comes to mock her, Procter, sitting next to her, softly replies, “No, no, but I hear only that...”(Page 1). Instead of cutting right to the chase like how he usually talks, he even starts a conversation about her recent life. This is out of the ordinary, because since when Proctor starts to care about Abigail’s personal life? While, Abigail claims that she “cannot bear lewd looks no more…[her] spirit’s changed entirely. [She] ought to be given Godly looks when [she] suffer[s]...”(Page 2). Speaking so godly of herself, Abigail seems possessed when she accounts her sufferings... ... middle of paper ... ... in this scene. “Why look at my leg. I’m holes all over from their damned needles and pins,” she pulls up her dress, and now touches her stomach. “The jab your wife gave me’s not healed yet, y’know.” (Page. 2) This clearly shows that Abigail still has feelings for him, and she is willing to get rid of all the “hypocrites” to be with him. The million-dollar question is, if Abigail is so deeply in love with Proctor, then why Abigail does nothing to protect Proctor in Act Ⅲ when she is given multiple opportunities to confess? Apparently, the scene should be left out to prevent the readers from being misled. It might be argued that this scene could contribute a new spectrum of character development to the play. However, the advantages resulted from excluding the scheme far outweigh the disadvantages. Hence, in the best interest of the play, the scene should be excluded.

Open Document