Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
group dynamics
group dynamics
Leadership theories and their applications
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: group dynamics
The team that I was a part of was a player service team located at a private golf club in northern Arizona. Player service can be described as the entire outside operation at a golf course such as managing the practice range which included setting up furniture and placements for hitting spots, cleaning up the practice putting and chipping greens of golf balls, rake the sand in the bunkers, breaking down the range, and cleaning all the golfs balls off the grass for morning mowing. Operating the bag drop area including the parking lot which made getting members clubs onto golf carts a faster process, placing golf bags onto the practice range, and checking players in on time for their tee times. Operating the staging area where we would attend to members finishing their round by cleaning their clubs and cleaning the trash out of the golf cart. Being a floater (supplier) for your staff was the most important position because you were the connection between stations and keep all the stations stocked. Each shift had a shift captain whom would be in charge of the player service staff during the shift period. The purpose of this team is to create a memorable and easy experience at the course by helping the member and their guests with anything they might need. This may be grabbing them a golf cart or helping with alignment on the range. Daily objectives were stressed on all aspects of communication. Every person was capable of completing not only their own work but assist on others in different positions. In order for the team to perform on its highest level, every member must work hard and make very few mistakes. Everyone involved understands that we are a team working towards the same goal every single day and knew what every member e...
... middle of paper ...
...m dynamics and social class. The team needs to change how it lets the leader affect the operations on a day to day case, and stand up to points that we disagreed with. By doing this, we will have a better hierarchy of power and the entire team will be on the same page. The entire course needs this to happen to show gaps in the structure and problems in their empowerment style.
Bibliography
Franz, Timothy M. (2013) “Group Dynamics and Team Interventions: Understanding and
Improving Team Performance.” Choice Reviews Online 50.07: 50-4133. Print.
Kipnis, D. (1976). The Powerholders. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Guinote, A. (2010). Social Class and Power. The social psychology of power. New York: Guilford Press, (408-409)
Wilson, F. M. (1999). Management Power. Organizational behavior: a critical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University
Raven, Bertram, and John French. Jr. "Legitimate Power, Coercive Power, and Observability in Social Influence ." Sociometry Vol. 21.No. 2 (1958): 83. Web. 2 Aug 2010. .
The members of theses higher levels are seen as groups of people that commonly interact with each other and in take each other’s opinions and concerns into account when formulating a decision. They are seen as a whole as the “upper class.” They are all a part of this social class and because of this treat people of diverse social classes differently. The people of the upper class gain an understanding of what they have in similarity to each other and use their stature to close ranks against outsiders, or people of different social
...rceived to have more wealth received special treatment in the weekend event I chose to attend, which is a clear indication of the disparities existing in terms of wealth distribution nationally and globally. The level of interaction for those present was based on perception of individual social status. People were more inclined to freely interact with individuals from a similar social status rather than a person from a different social status. While some had ascribed status, other presented achieved stratification status. However, the difference emerging from this scenario is that a small number of individuals are given opportunities to amass wealth within a short time while the rest linger in their glory. In return, the cultural response to this difference is to elevate those who have amassed wealth at the expense of those in middle and low-class income bracket.
G. William Domhoff is by trade a psychologist and sociologist and is the author of several books on the theory of power and class structure. In his book, Who rules America Now? Domhoff provides an in depth analysis of the structure of wealth and power in America. He asserts the existence of an institutional upper class in America that is able to dictate/direct the politics, economy and government by virtue of its wealth and power. I contend that Domhoff through his analysis of the wealth and power structure of the American upper class can be considered as a lay cultural theorist. This is based upon his identification of the cultural processes of the upper class - those learned shared patterns of behaviors and interactions that allow them to “sustain and optimize opportunities and forms of sociality” (Stryker 2011), for survival. In this paper, I will argue the existence of an institutional upper class in America identified by its infrastructure, wealth and power. (Domhoff 2005) This class is a minority in terms of population, in particular the 5% of this social class who possess the majority of wealth in this nation. They have “the ability to set the terms under which other groups and classes must operate” (Domhoff 2005).
People Like Us: Social Class in America. Dir. Louis Alvarez and Andy Kolker. Center for
According to Brenda Allen in the chapter “Power Matters,” she mentions that there dominant ideologies of identity that “reflect perspectives and experiences of ruling groups, whose members construct and circulate beliefs that will most benefit them.” We live in a country where there are dominant ideologies of organizational hierarchy, which “arranges job positions in a stratified structure, with power flowing from the top down.” This exemplifies the ideology of domination, which is a belief system in America that the “superior should rule over the inferior” (32). This ideology is so embedded into our system that most people believe it is natural. The American society we live in values patriarchy, white supremacy, heteronormativity, and a specific culture of wealth and poverty; any identity that falls outside of these dominant ideologies is marginalized and placed in the lower strata of social power.
William Domhoff’s investigation into America’s ruling class is an eye-opening and poignant reading experience, even for enlightened individuals regarding the US social class system. His book, Who Rules America, exploits the fundamental failures in America’s governing bodies to provide adequate resources for class mobility and shared power. He identifies history, corporate and social hierarchy, money-driven politics, a two-party system, and a policy-making process orchestrated by American elites amongst a vast array of causes leading to an ultimate effect of class-domination theory pervading American society. In articulating his thesis and supporting assertions, Domhoff appeals rhetorically toward an audience with prior knowledge of America’s
In the same way that societies create diversity, the power structures of societies also create stratified disparities (Kottak & Kozaitis, 2012). Classism works in conjunction with existing prejudices toward minority ethnicities. While only half of the entire white population is considered to be poor, the majority of the poor population is comprised of black, latino, and Native American individuals (Yeskel, 2007). Therefore, the structure of the American economy works consistently to conceal classism behind a facade of racial and culture differences, convincing its citizenry that the differences in wealth are ascribed to differences in ability and work ethic. According t...
Raven, B. H. 1993. The bases of power: Origins and recent developments. Journal of Social issues, 49 (4), pp. 227--251. Accessed from: DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb01191.
Society is highly stratified when considering social classes i.e. - upper class, middle class, lower class, and working class citizens. That being said, not everyone has the same access to the superstructure; thus creating tension. The largest problem when considering structure and agency is the constant struggle and negotiation of power inequality. Among the asymmetry of power are two major disparities; class and gender. Thinking as a critical theorist, one must consider the individual’s participation in the public sphere; “The word means a false view of the world that is in the interests of the powerful citizens in order to keep the subordinate classes oppressed” (Habermas, 10). Though the public sphere is virtually a democratic sphere where ideas can circulate and opinions are formed there are certain restrictions when referring to lower classes and women and thus how their agencies as individuals are limited.
has emphasized an upper class at the period. And, high status people control the people’s view.
It the world we live in today, everything is about money whether you realize it or not. People are getting greedier, trying to find a way to increase their wealth constantly. Sometimes people do this at the risk of other people; in seek of their own “happiness.” Food, clothes, transportation, bills, and so much more all require money of some sort. Adriana Delgado says, “The vast differences between the rich and the poor, the powerful and the powerless, will be the catalyst for the best intentions to be rewarded with ungratefulness and contempt, creating resentment and mistrust between the classes.” This line quoted by Delgado shows how power is related directly to money. When she refers to the classes, there are the 3 well known classes: the lower or poor, the middle or
...top positions in the governmental and business hierarchy from communal principles and beliefs. Majority come from the upper third of the salary and professional pyramids, their upbringings were from the same upper class, some attended the same preparatory school and Ivy League universities. Also, they belong to the same organizations. The power elite have the power to control programs and actions of important governmental, financial, legal, educational, national, scientific, and public institutions. The ones in power influence half of the nation’s manufacturing, infrastructures, transportation, banking possessions, and two thirds of all insurance possessions. The occupants take essential actions that could affect everyone’s’ life in American society. Rulings made in meetings of significant corporations and banks can influence the rates of inflation and unemployment.
In the book, Game of Thrones, there are many examples of power, and how it’s related to social class. In this series, all of the high lords are wealthy landowners. They own vast plains and farms and are the master to many servants and maids. They have lots of money from their farms and collect taxes from within their borders. This is a great example of how power is related to social class because all of these things that makes them a lord, like owning land, also contributes to social class. According to this book, social class directly correlates with power.
Haralambos, Holborn and Heard (2004:12-14) defined a class as a group of individuals who share a similar position in a market economy, and by virtue of that fact receive similar economic rewards. Class in a modern society is perceived based on achieved criteria as oppos...