Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction for teachers ethics
Ethics in education
What is the main purpose of punishment to students
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Introduction for teachers ethics
My chosen task is the Jeremy case study, which I will discuss and evaluate using different ethical viewpoints. Firstly, from a contextualism point of view, the teacher’s decision not to punish Phillip for punching Jeremy can be seen as being justifiable. This is because the context of the incident was that Jeremy had been provoking Phillip to the point that Phillip acted in a way that is described as being out of character. As Jeremy is known as a pupil that causes low level disruption, it can be argued that Phillip’s retaliation was actually in everyone’s best interest. It is, obviously, hard to justify one child hitting another; however the fact that Jeremy continued quietly with his work does suggest that the punch either did not hurt that badly or even that he felt that he deserved to be hit. Furthermore, the teacher can be seen as being right to not act upon Phillip hitting Jeremy, as it was morally right. This links to Buzzelli and Johnston’s belief that “teaching itself involves moral action” and that “teachers are moral agents”. This adds with Homan who said that “ethics is the science of morality”. So, whilst taking these theories into account, the teacher’s lack of acknowledgment (of Phillip’s behaviour) can be seen as being ethical, as it was morally correct for the child who was being extremely provoked to retaliate. On the other hand, it can be debated that it is never morally correct to hit another person, no matter what the situation is. To this, it should be noted that everyone’s moral code is different and that, in this scenario, the teacher believing that Jeremy being hit on the shoulder is justifiable as it stopped him being a disruption, cannot be seen as being irrefutably right or wrong. More generally, the co...
... middle of paper ...
...er, in this time, a different pupil could provokingly punch Jeremy due to thinking that Phillip had not been punished.
The teacher’s lack of response to the situation could be seen as being justified, from a consequentialism point of view, as the end (Jeremy continuing quietly with his work) justifies the means (Phillip punching Jeremy). However, the negative consequences of other pupils perhaps acknowledging that Phillip was not punished for punching Jeremy (creating an idea that they can punch anyone who provokes them) could suggest otherwise. In addition, the same could be said for the teacher not intervening at all, not even when the disruption arose. Had the teacher intervened, it would have (arguably) prevented the situation, but (at the same time) it would’ve also meant giving Jeremy the attention that he, perhaps, desires; as well as disrupting entire class.
A teacher’s most important duty is to protect the students they are in charge of. This duty includes both reasonably protecting students from harm and, when a student is harmed, reporting it to the proper authorities (Gooden, Eckes, Mead, McNeal, & Torres, 2013, pp. 103-109). There have been many court cases that reiterate this duty of school staff. One such case is Frugis v. Bracigliano (2003) where many staff at a school failed in their duty to protect students and allowed abuse to continue for years.
Chapter 1 of The Power of Guidance talks about the theory that teachers must be patient. In Nancy Webber 's article “Guidance or Punishment” she addresses the behavior of a student, Ryan, and questions if having more patience will help his teacher in helping him learn. She goes on to explain why she is uncomfortable with correlating this term with teaching due to the context of it being used in unpleasant situations (2). Rather, she believes that she has little patience because of her passion to teach. In her opinion, a person whom dislikes teaching and working with children has more patience. Instead, she defines this behavior as a part of development and believes that teachers should accept that aspect of their jobs. It is this key understanding that separates a good teacher from a poor one. If a teacher wants to help their student, they need to be willing to help them to find ways to appropriately display their emotions, rather than tollerate their behaviors and use patience to control the situation.
I agree that teachers must think before they act and process the best consequence to the action that he or she will or will not do in class. The book makes a point on talking about how teachers must thoughtfully decide if what they are doing every single day. I believe that that is a crucial quality every teacher must have in order to avoid major issues in the classroom. It is amazing how much can change when a teacher, or anyone, thinks about what they are doing before they do it and what are the possible consequences are based on their action. Better than thinking about it, if they talk to one another, as teachers, on how they should act, this would help them even more to make the right decision. I also agree teachers deserve the right to due process, just like everyone else in their profession. Being a teacher is very difficult, and it is very important that teachers are not constantly scared to lose their job with one bad choice. There are so many parents out there who will immediately try to get the teacher fired in any way they can in order for their child to be happy which is very threatening to teachers everywhere. The fact that due process is given to teachers is extremely important for the sanity of teacher’s minds and their performance as teachers. Lastly, I agree with tort liability because teachers must be on high alert at all times with their classroom. Any possibilities of injury in the classroom must be thought about by the teacher and prevented in anyway. Teachers are one hundred percent liable to what goes on in their classroom and they need to pay attention to all kinds of behavior that could lead to danger. Teachers never should be able to say that it was the student’s fault that they were injured in their classroom with their
A family is referred to me because the parents have been using excessive punishment with their son and daughter. Whenever their children misbehave at school or at home the father beats them with a belt all over their legs and back and the mother does not beat them with a belt or other objects but she will slap them in the face if they are out of line or she will refuse to let them eat for a whole day if they do not do their chores or if they have a temper tantrum. The parents are wanting to change and find better ways to punish their children when they misbehave because they are at risk for losing their children to Child Protective Services if they do not change their forms of punishment. Both the Mother and Father were raised in a household where their parents used excessive punishment and they do not know any other way to punish their children. They also have no knowledge of the fact that they can change the behaviors of their children in a positive way by using the appropriate forms of extinction, punishments and reinforcements. I would then define, explain and give examples of extinction, punishment and negative reinforcement to the parents to make sure that this excessive punishments does not happen again. I would ask the parents what some of the triggers are and discipline problems that they are experiencing from their children to cause them to resort to using excessive punishments. I would then use those behavior problems such as temper tantrums and the children not doing their daily chores without being told to do so to be able to come up with an action plan to try and help the parents change those negative behaviors in their children in a positive way.
They also contribute and influence bad and even student with good behavior, however, nobody can envisage, when and who, will become violent like peter case, he thought nineteen minute is enough for him to revenge. Nobody thought he can become violent even her teacher and his parent, he changes suddenly, Peter shot people and injured many students including his math
Teachers play a very important role in their student’s lives. Some would even argue that teachers have the greatest influence on their students, and while at young ages it is important for a teacher to only behave in a moral way, there comes a point when it is no longer a teacher’s job to teach his or her students how to function in society. This idea is supported in the movie Rope when two college students kill someone they deem as inferior, using their former professor’s words as their excuse. It is made abundantly clear through difference in demeanor between Brandon and Phillip and through their professor’s reaction upon finding David’s body in the final scene that the murder most likely would have transpired with or without Professor Rupert’s influence.
Raising a child is a challenging life task that is given over to individuals all over the world without an instruction manual. People must learn by experience how to nurture, care for, and provide for miniature versions of themselves for almost two decades in most cultures! Discipline plays a major role in raising a child because most parents truly want what is best for their children and want them to grow up to be responsible, respectable, and successful adults; however, in some unfortunate cases, parents misinterpret the term discipline and in turn end up abusing their children. The question becomes, is there truly a difference between discipline and abuse? And if so, what is it? With education, individuals can learn how to properly distinguish between discipline and abuse and realize that there is a clear black and white difference between the two. The origin of the word discipline stems from the Latin word disciplina, which means “instruction [or] knowledge” (“Definition of discipline”, n.d.). As stated in the Oxford Dictionary, the definition of the word discipline is “the practice of training people to obey rules or a code of behavior, [or] using punishment to correct disobedience” (“Definition of discipline”, n.d.). According to WebMD, a website that is visited and seen by millions of people in the United States every day, discipline is “the process of teaching your child what type of behavior is acceptable and what type is not acceptable. In other words, discipline teaches a child to follow rules” (“Child Discipline Methods”, n.d.). It even goes on to state that “it sounds so straightforward, yet every parent becomes frustrated at one time or another with issues surrounding children and discipline” (“Child Discipline Metho...
The teacher then called the principle which resulted in the police being called. When the police got there he asked student to get up and when he didn’t get what he wanted he flipped her out the chair and dragged her across the room. Even though bad behavior is not excepted in schools there could have been different ways the situation could have been handled other than aggressive force.
Because the beliefs, education and cultures of people vary so much, along with the age of the child, methods of child discipline vary widely. The topic of child discipline involves a wide range of fields such as parenting, behavioural analysis, developmental psychology, social work and various religious perspectives. Advances in the understanding of parenting have provided a background of theoretical understanding and practical understanding of the effectiveness of parenting methods.
Initially, I define the two concepts of mistaken behavior and misbehavior, the first as an error in judgment and action made in the process of learning life skills. Mistaken behaviors occur at three levels which are: experimentation, socially influenced, and strong unmet needs. Teachers who use guidance see self-ruled life skills as difficult to learn, and they recognize that children are just at the beginning stages of a lifelong process of learning these skills. In the process of learning any difficult skill, children, like all of us, make mistakes. These teachers recognize that when children experiences conflicts it is because they have not yet developed the cognitive and emotional resources for more mature responses. The second concept being misbehavior is the conventional term applied to conflicts that the child is involved in, resulting in consequences that often include punishment and the internalization of a negative label such a “naughty”. The complexity of teaching self-ruled life skills leads some adults to the misconception that young children know how to behave, they just choose to misbehave. When conflicts occur, teacher who focus on misbehavior tend to label the child’s character and attempt to shame the child into better behavior.
Foucault and Heidegger, modern philosophers, both describe power in these terms, as the facility to manipulate an object without force. Understanding this point of view is important, not only for state institutions who attempt to exert power over citizens and deviants, but also for teachers as they try to use disciplinary power to control the events in their classroom. Unfortunately, the majority of status quo disciplinary systems are entrenched in the mindset that power can be exerted over individuals through the use of coercive punishments and threats, actions which usually have the complete opposite result, less control over the students. A system that more closely mirrors Thomas Gordon’s view of discipline as self-control would be a far superior disciplinary model because it recognizes the true nature of power.
When I was a child, I could not remember a time when my parents spanked me. I asked my mom how she and my dad disciplined my three brothers and I, and she said she never spanked us. When we got into trouble we were sent to our room, and had privileges taken away. My mom also said that she can remember spanking my younger brother once, but left a bruise on his bottom, and she felt so bad that she never did it again.
Throughout the years kids have been committing terrible crimes that are just as bad as the crimes an adult would commit, sometimes even worse. These children have received life sentences with the possibility of no parole along with counseling and even rehabilitation. Many believe that putting an adolescent in jail with a life sentences is a cruel and unfair punishment. In the past couple of years the law has changed to those under 18 will not be sent to jail, only to a rehabilitation center or juvenile hall for no more than a year. People believe that is much more suitable for a teenager rather than keeping them locked away in jail for more than what they’ve lived.
they? - do two wrongs make a right?) but why is it so important that
gives in a buys the toy car. Now ask yourself who is in charge here,