Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
ethics of tobacco companies
ethics of tobacco companies
ethical challenges of tobacco marketing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: ethics of tobacco companies
The movie The Insider literally provides a seeing glass perspective into the summation of ethical issues in businesses that directly affects the consumers physical and psychological health and the alleged methods that the tobacco company would resort to in order to safe guard itself from litigation and from disclosing information that will adversely affect the sale of its sole money making product yet is ultimately crucial to its customers understanding of the contents of the product that they are purchasing and its implications on their personal health.
There are several ethical philosophies in play here regarding the tobacco company and these ethical issues can be explored by analyzing the myriad of interplay of relationships between the characters in the movie and the choices that they make based on certain public and private interests and values. To summarize there is the reluctant protagonist Jeffery Wigand who was the corporate vice president/research chemist of a tobacco company but essentially an employee who was fired yet is still under a non-disclosure clause in a confidentiality agreement with said former company. Secondly the relationship of the company towards its employees regarding its hiring and firing policies, the relationship between the tobacco company with its consumers and the evident issue of justice versus profit making in the tobacco business.
Amongst all the ethical issues stated above, the main ethical issue that would be of the utmost importance in the tobacco industry would be the relationship and obligation between the company and its consumers. In a nutshell a tobacco or cigarette selling company sells its products which according to numerous health and scientific research organizations such as ...
... middle of paper ...
...ith proper cause. Secondly the ethical breach of conduct by the company itself by threatening Jeff Wigands family and the termination of his severance pay and health benefits. And lastly the alleged intimidation by the tobacco company which includes email threats, psychological intimidation and the disclosing of Jeff Wigand’s private life to the media to defame his character and subsequently make his sworn deposition unreliable.
In conclusion, ethics has no place in the tobacco business and the rights and obligations that usually would apply for any other company would not apply to a tobacco company as the right to trade secrecy, information privacy or the right to get a customer to buy its products is nullified by the fact the tobacco industry itself is absolutely built to sell products that are scientifically proven to be carcinogenic and harmful to its users.
The smoking issue is very complicated and some of the arguments are beyond the scope of this essay. Still, we can obtain a balanced outlook if we consider the following: the facts of smoking, individual right, societal responsibility, and the stigma of smoking. Haviland and King write essays which contain very important points, but seem to contain a bias which may alienate some people. To truly reach a consensus on the smoking issue, we must be willing to meet each other halfway. We must strike equilibrium between individual right and societal responsibility.
The decision is also good as it is in line with the corporate social responsibilities. It is socially ethical for the company to reduce or eliminate the tobacco products in the company’s drugs stores and shelves. Moreover, it is the social responsibility of the business to ensure a healthy living of the society. Production and distribution of tobacco products will, however, be an irony for the organization whose sole mandate is to ensure healthy and productive society.
The tobacco industry seems like a beneficial addition to our economy. It has basically been a socially acceptable business in the past because it brings jobs to our people and tax money to the government to redistribute; but consider the cost of tobacco related treatment, mortality and disability- it exceeds the benefit to the producer by two hundred billion dollars US. (4) Tobacco is a very profitable industry determined to grow despite government loss or public health. Its history has demonstrated how money can blind morals like an addiction that is never satisfied. Past lawsuits were mostly unsuccessful because the juries blamed the smoker even though the definition of criminal negligence fits the industry’s acts perfectly. Some may argue for the industry in the name of free enterprise but since they have had such a clear understanding of the dangers of their product it changes the understanding of their business tactics and motives. The success of the industry has merely been a reflection of its immoral practices. These practices have been observed through its use of the media in regards to children, the tests that used underage smokers, the use of revenue to avoid the law, the use of nicotine manipulation and the suppression of research.
Ethically as we Americans have defined is not on the minds of these executives of the cigarette firms. Our society has made it ethically and legally wrong to sell cigarettes to a minor. These companies located in the United States adhere to the laws and ethical issues within our borders, so what is the difference when they practice these unethical business transactions in smaller countries. These smaller, less developed countries do not have the technology and understanding to disallow the sale of cigarettes to minors. These gigantic tobacco companies should follow the same practices in smaller countries as they do in their home country the U.S.
Then to only confirm Wigand’s suspicion he notices more and more men following him to the most remote places like the late night golf game, which explodes into a panicked argument with Bergman, who sternly replies, “Story. No Story. F*** your story. I don’t burn people.” When Wigand and Bergman meet again, the wheels start turning as Wigand began sharing the dirt on the tobacco industry or as he said “the seven dwarfs” of big tobacco and how they do not care and neglect anything that would hurt their market such as issues with addiction and illness. That is the nature of the greedy, power hungry executives that want to take as much as they can without thinking of anyone they hurt. Now the only way to put a stop to the tyranny is for Wigand to choose between sticking to his confidentiality agreement or releasing the truth for the
All companies sell their products strictly to make money. A tobacco company sells tobacco for the same reason. No companies force the consumer to purchase the product. Tobacco companies do not make force people to purchase tobacco. The tobacco company may have a guilty conscience knowing that the product that they sell has led to many illness related fatalities, but once again the company did not for the product on the consumers. The tobacco company is not at fault for any of the illnesses, because the company did not make anyone go into the store, purchase the tobacco, and make the person use it. America is a free Nation. A nation of choice, but many Americans make choices that put their bodies at risk every day. This choice to use tobacco is one made daily by the user not by the producer.
There is clearly no way tobacco will never be outlawed but I believe there should be tighter restrictions on age limits throughout the world, and restrictions on the materials that are used in cigarette processing. Who is just letting cigarette companies continue to poison people and cause cancer risk? Throughout my essay I will analyze the affects of cigarette use on the society of the world and the elaborate corruption that keeps cigarette companies in business.
The author identifies two reasons to be the probable cause for pharmacies or grocery stores to stop selling tobacco products. The reasons that he highlights are the health related argument and the restriction imposed on selling it. CVS is a pharmacy that is selling medications and products that helps people health. Since tobacco is not making people health any good, the question of it being ethically right to sell it in pharmacies has brought people’s attention. The author packs his thoughts with an example of the New York retailers that have stopped selling tobacco product because of the high tax rates from 1.25$ to 4.35$ per pack in 2010. Also, the restrictions implemented like having a license to sell it and fees increase from 100$ to 1000$
Tobacco companies are strategical placed all over the world and in some countries that we did not know even existed. Cigarette companies are doing all they possibly can to make money, just like every other company. These tobacco companies do not care about the consumers and the risks that come along with consuming tobacco products. The companies are continuously suing countries because of the way these countries are advertising tobacco products. Yes, I am aware that these multimillion dollar operations need to make money, but however on the other hand the way that cigarettes get advertised should not end up with that country getting in trouble from those companies. Of course many will probably agree with me that suing countries should not be an option. The over all solution I have for this major problem contains the following: once tobacco is purchased from tobacco companies, countries will have the right to advertise these products in which ever ways they please. Also, this will further cancel tobacco companies from being able to sue countries.
The tobacco industry is a very unethical industry, due to the long term effects of tobacco on humans. The industry also does not assess the ethical and social responsibility the best way that it should. There are many factors that make the industry unethical; some of the reasons are the way the cigarette companies around the world Advertise, the way governments and cigarette companies make a huge profit from the sales of cigarettes, and the labeling health risks. I do believe however that there is something that the tobacco companies can do to better their strategy as far as their ethics go. I think that they should, always be looking for the best interest on their consumers, as well as advertise strictly on the effects that the cigarettes and what the people are getting for their money.
Although it is beneficial for the economy for the production of tobacco products it is extremely risky to use the product. According to researchers second-hand smoke is terrible for everyone in the world who walk by someone who is exhaling. In the article by Robert Proctor “Why ban the sale of cigarettes? The case for abolition” he states that cigarettes are the “most deadl...
charged with covering up the addictive properties of nicotine and finding ways to exploit it to increase profits. For example, in Wigand’s interview for 60 Minutes, he says that tobacco companies view cigarettes only as a delivery device for nicotine. He also says they take advantage of the addictive properties by manipulating and adj...
The utilitarian perspective would say it is right to disclose information about tobacco industry because, the possible benefits to public far out way the cost. Was Wigand angry at the industry or was it for good of humanity? Would Dr. Wigand disclose information about the industry if he were not fired? Kant would suggest that Wigand does not disclose the information. This contradicts with the principle of the universal law of breaking promises, he should uphold the integrity of the contract.Lowell Bergman a journalist hired to expose the big lies and air the hard-hitting stories. Be...
Tobacco is made from dried up tobacco leaves prepared with chemicals to create products such as: chewing tobacco, dip, and loose tobacco to be smoked on cigarettes and pipes. There is a demand for tobacco and if companies were to stop making tobacco, then another company will sell it due to supply and demand. Even though people do choose to buy tobacco products on their own free will. Tobacco companies are partly to blame for smoking related illnesses and deaths since they knowingly create a product that is harmful, in addition, they try to appeal to a younger audience, and lastly, tobacco products are highly addictive.
Before we start, I think it's important that you know a little thing about me, and where I'm coming from. I do smoke. But I believe that most of the lawsuits filed against the tobacco industry are unfounded, desperate attempts for people to put the blame on anyone but themselves.