Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Mortgage crisis of 2007
Mortgage crisis of 2007
Mortgage crisis of 2007
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Mortgage crisis of 2007
Introduction
In 2010 more than 1.05 million homes were foreclosed on in the United States, up from 918,000 in 2009. It is estimated that 26 percent of these homes were strategically defaulted on by homeowners that were “upside down” in their home equity. Is the decision to strategically default ethically sound? It has been estimated that in 2009 foreclosures cost communities $502 billion and homes that in close proximity to foreclosed homes lose, on average, $7,200 in home value (Center for Reasonable Lending, 2009).
Clarify Concepts
Strategic default is the non-payment of a mortgage obligation by a homeowner that is “underwater” in their mortgage contract and has other meaningful credit obligations on which they continue paying (Tirupattur, Chang & Egan, 2010). A homeowner is considered “underwater” when the mortgage obligation on their property is more than the current market value of the property. Strategic default ultimately results in the property being placed in foreclosure, which is the legal process by which a homeowner’s rights to the property are terminated. A real estate bubble is defined as rapid increases in home valuations that are unsustainable comparative to income and the economy.
Identify Possible Solutions to the Problem
The mortgage lien holder or lender could proactively offer mortgage obligation modification to homeowners in areas most affected by the decline of the real estate market and economic recession. States such as California, Florida and Nevada have experienced property value declines as high as 65 percent in the last four years. Mortgage obligation modification is the suggested solution of the United States Treasury Department, which feels this course of action would end the mortg...
... middle of paper ...
...ton College of Law, American University, Washington, D.C.
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P. & Zingales, L. (2009). Moral and Social Constraints to Strategic Default on Mortgages. Manuscript submitted for publication, European University Institute, Northwestern University and University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Leipziger, D.A. (1976). The Mortgagee’s Remedies for Waste. California Law Review, 64(2).
Levitin, A. (2009). Resolving the Foreclosure Crisis: Modification of Mortgages in Bankruptcy. Manuscript submitted for publication, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, D.C.
Tirupattur, V., Chang, O., & Egan, J. (2010). Understanding Strategic Defaults. Morgan Stanley Research. New York, New York.
White, B.T. (2010). The Morality of Strategic Default. Manuscript submitted for publication, Arizona Legal Studies, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Leading up to the crisis of the housing market, borrowers got mortgages without understanding the terms. Banks were giving out loans to people the banks weren't sure could pay the money back. The closer to the crisis, the higher the frequency of illegitimate loans and mortgages. Because there were so many mortgages on houses that could not be paid back, millions of mortgages were foreclosed on, and the houses we...
A majority of mortgage defaults that Americans used were on subprime mortgage loans, which were high-interest-rate loans lent to people with high risk credit rates (Brue). Despite knowing the risks, the Federal government encouraged major banks to lend out these loans to buyers, in hopes, of broadening ho...
The Sub-Prime Mortgage Crisis of 2008 has been the largest financial crisis to take place since the end of the Great Depression. It was the actions of individuals and companies that caused this crisis. For although it could have been adverted, too much money was being made by too many people in place of authority to think deeply on the situation. As such, by the time actions were taken to attempt to rectify the situation, it was already too late. Trillions of dollar of tax payers’ money was spent trying to repair the situation that was caused by the breakdown of ethics and accountability in the private sector. And despite the government’s actions to attempt to contain the crisis, hundreds of thousands lives were negatively affected before, during, and after this crisis.
Abortion has been a political, social, and personal topic for many years now. The woman’s right to choose has become a law that is still debated, argued and fought over, even though it has been passed. This paper will examine a specific example where abortion is encouraged, identify the Christian world views beliefs and resolution as well as the consequences of such, and compare them with another option.
The problem to be investigated is the ethics and effects of subprime loans on the financial institutions, borrowers and stakeholders. The subprime market was created to provide borrowers with a FICO score below 570 access to home loans. Inopportunely these loans were a major financial risk as most of the borrowers did not have the long-term income to pay for the high interest rate loans. (Jennings, 2012)
The 2008 financial crisis led to a sharp increase in mortgage foreclosures primarily subprime leading to a collapse in several mortgage lenders. Recurrent foreclosures and the harms of subprime mortgages were caused by loose lending practices, housing bubble, low interest rates and extreme risk taking (Zandi, 2008). Additionally, expert analysis on the 2008 financial crisis assert that the cause was also due to erroneous monetary policy moves and poor housing policies. The federal government encouraged the expansion of risky mortgages to under-qualified borrowers. Congress pushed for the support of affordable housing through extended procurement of non-prime loans for applicants with low income (Zandi, 2008). The cutting down of interest rates to low levels to supplement for technology bubble of early twentieth century and the effects of Sept 11, a housing bubble was created. This move facilitated individuals with poor credit to obtain mortgages in high percentage when lenders created non-conventional mortgages by offering mortgages with extensive amortization periods, loans with interest and payment alternatives such as ARMs (Angelides et al, 2011). Ultimately, interest rates rose again and many subprime borrowers stopped paying for their mortgages when their interest rate were reset to higher monthly payments. This paper will discuss the impact of the financial crisis as a result of subprime mortgages.
In the following case, Luke is involved in a very perplexing conflict, or Ethical dilemma. This situation is an Ethical dilemma, and not just a regular “everyday” problem, because to Luke there might not be an obvious answer. He can also be thinking that both choices, keeping his commitments of confidentiality and telling his brother, Owen, are both correct things to do. If Luke tells his brother about the project, then he might concur with a theory known as Breach of confidentiality. “Breach of confidentiality occurs when someone gives away information that was supposed to be kept private.” (GENB4350 Online Lecture, Ethical Reasoning 1). By Luke breaching information that is supposed to be kept secret, he will betray the trust of his company
Thompson, Arthur, John Gamble, John Gamble, A. III, and Alonzo Strickland. Strategy. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2005. 299. Print.
The subprime mortgage crisis is an ongoing event that is affecting buyers who purchased homes in the early 2000s. The term subprime mortgage refers to the many home loans taken out during a housing bubble occurring on the US coast, from 2000-2005. Home loans were given at a subprime rate, and have now led to extensive foreclosures on home loans, and people having to leave their homes because they can not afford the payments. The cause and effect of this crisis can be broken down into five major reasons. When subprime mortgages began to flourish, the term housing bubble came into existence.
Mortgage loans are a substantial form of revenue for the financial industry. Mortgage loans generate billions of dollars in the financial industry. It is no secret that companies have the ability to make a lot of money by offering a variety of mortgage loan products. The problem was not mortgage loans but that mortgage companies were using unethical behavior to get consumer mortgage loans approved. Unfortunately, the Countrywide Financial case was not an isolated case. Many top name mortgage companies have been guilty of unethical behavior. Just as the American housing market was starting to recover from its worst battering since the Great Depression, a new scandal, an epidemic of flawed or fraudulent mortgage documents, threatens to send not just the housing market but the entire economy back into a tailspin (Nation, 2010).
Individuals like the two young and rambunctious mortgage consultants portrayed in the film gave loans to anyone and everyone that could sign the paper, regardless of the recipient’s ability to pay the loan in full. It is doubtful that all consultants fully understood the ramifications of their actions, but undoubtedly the overall disregard for consequence was the start of the collapse. Mortgage consultants mislead and tricked people into loans they could never afford by playing on their desire to live the American dream. Distributing adjustable rate loans to individuals without jobs, without collateral is unconscionable. Unfortunately, from their perspective they were helping these individuals. In a twisted way, these consultants were acting ethically from a utilitarian point of view. The consultants won because they received utility in the form of a bonus for distributing the loans, and the loanee won because they could now afford the home of their dreams. What the consultants didn’t consider in their calculations were the long term results and utility of their actions, unethically building the flawed foundation of the housing
In this assignment we will be identifying an ethical dilemma an individual has experienced. We will begin with a short introduction of what an ethical dilemma is, moving on to providing brief details of the dilemma an individual has experienced. We will then go on to selecting one ethical theory, to show how it can help an individual understand and deal with the situation when placed within, followed by a conclusion.
...‘Consideration: Practical benefit and the Emperor’s new clothes’ in Beatson and Friedmann (eds). Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law (Oxford University Press, 1995);
The study defines “default” as a risk to the repayment history of borrowers where the borrowers have missed at least three installments in 24 months. This shows a symbol and indication of borrower behavior that will actually default to cease all repayments. This definition does not mean that the borrower had entirely stopped paying the loan and therefore been referred to collection or legal processes; or from an accounting perspective that the loan had been classified as bad or doubtful, or actually written-off (Pearson & Greeff, 2006). While, McMillion (2004) states that default is the risk where the borrower is unable to pay the loans. Default risk increases if a borrower has a large number of liabilities and poor cash flow.
Everyone in this world has experienced an ethical dilemma in different situations and this may arise between one or more individuals. Ethical dilemma is a situation where people have to make complex decisions and are influenced based on personal interest, social environment or norms, and religious beliefs (“Strategic Leadership”, n.d.). The leaders and managers in the company should set guidelines to ensure employees are aware and have a better chance to solve and make ethical decisions. Employees are also responsible in understanding their ethical obligations in order to maintain a positive work environment. The purpose of this case study is to identify the dilemma and analyze different decisions to find ways on how a person should act