From an ethical perspective, the Tru-seal scenario provides a great deal of questions to be answered. Having been in the village for nearly 100 years, Tru-seal had built up a good reputation, the company being a fairly stable provider of jobs and working to limit its carbon footprint. However, with the pending deal with the Ford Motor Company and sale to the company from India, as well as the environmental issues, the company's leadership has several difficult decisions to make.
1. As the president of Tru-seal, prioritizing these ethical issues would be very difficult, as each has a great effect on a large group. The first issue that I would address would be whether or not to inform the union of the pending sale. When looking at this issue, I would need to decide the consequences of such a decision, how it would affect all the employees and how it might affect both the deal with Ford and the Indian company. Despite having such a tenuous history with the union, it may be deemed important that its members have a complete understanding of how decisions are made, which could lead to mutual understanding. However, in telling the union, it could cause an uprising and further increase the divide between the union and company leadership. This could lead to negative public sentiment and the loss of both the Ford and Indian company deal. In staying with the employment theme, next it would be important to decide whether or not to increase the number of jobs, even if those positions would be dissolved after two years. What would be important to consider here is the degree to which having those jobs would affect the village and the company. The question of whether or not the company has a duty to the village to provide these jobs, as from a u...
... middle of paper ...
... ensure that the best decisions is being made.
I did not feel as though it was ethically right to not involve the union a decision of this magnitude. I hope that rather than continuing the scorn and displeasure we have show one another over the last four years, we will be able to come together and solve this problem. Let me be clear, this does not mean that Tru-seal will not be sold and moving overseas in the near future. What it does mean, is that we are willing to work on trying to stay in Jones County, working with the union in order to keep jobs in the U.S. Over the next two years, we will evaluate how the company as a whole is operating. If it is at all possible to stay, we will try to the best of our ability to make it work."
- John Jay Patterson
President, Tru-seal Company
References:
1. DeGeorge, R. T. (2010). Business Ethics. Pearson. (pgs 44, 45, 100)
The case study of GMFC provides an example of a company attempting to avoid unionization of its workers. GMFC is expanding by building a new U.S. plant which will manufacture motorized recreational equipment. The company plans to hire about 500 production workers to assemble mechanical components, fabricate fiberglass body parts, and assemble the final products. In order to avoid the expected union campaign by the United Automobile Workers (UAW) to organize its workers, GMFC must implement specific strategies to keep the new plant union-free. GMFC’s planning committee offers suggestions with regards to the plant’s size, location, staffing, wages and benefits, and other employee relations issues in order to defend the company against the negative effects of unionization and increase...
The ethical issue in this situation is the willingness of the company’s director to prevent the employees from organizing in union. Among others, the company’s director try to use unfair tactic like diversion, intimidation, manipulation, termination of job contract and threat to shut down the company leading to massive loss of job. In an ethical standpoint, these tactics are wrong.
The method of ethical decision making which was developed by Dr. Cathryn A. Baird presented two components contained in all ethical decisions which are; The Four ethical Lenses and the 4+1 Decision process. The Four Ethical Lenses issue claims that different ethical theories and the means in which we tend to approach the situations which form part of our ethical traditions are looked at in four different perspectives. From each perspective there are different values on which to decide whether the action taken is either ethical or not and each lens also lays emphasis on determining whether the decision made is of ethical requirement. In the 4+1 Decision Process, people who are responsible for making final decisions in an organization do it using four specific decision making steps and eventually will end up with one extra decision which gives a chance to reflect. The 4+1 decision process allows the decision makers to give solutions when faced with complicated ethical issues (John Muir Institute for Environmental Studies, 2000).
...on have major intellectual and financial backing, as well as good reason to come to an agreement. However, the knowledge, skills and commitment needed to survive today in international business must be found on the plant floor as well as in the office. Noting the need for cooperation, the union local president asked “What the hell are they going to do when they get that work force back in there? Who’s going to cooperate”?
It is obvious that executives and managers at both British Petroleum and Transocean have changed the civil right statement “by any means necessary” to reflect their desire to make profits. The unethical behavior that has been engrained within both business cultures calls in the question the ethics of all powerful oil based companies. Leaders must be attentive and adhere to all safety and maintenance concerns. The damage and loss that was incurred could have been avoided if executives would have made more logical and ethically based decisions. Leaders should be able to recognize their psychological tendencies and correct them when making ethical decisions for their businesses. Through striving to make ethical decisions, organizations can set the tone for company morale and success.
At Wister manufacturing the company was faced with a serious problem, when the main supplier to the company pushed back its next order for the next two months. Which has put the 19 employees that work for Wister manufacturing in the fate of the companies hands of being laid off for 90 days. With nothing to do for 90 days and enough money to pay the 19 employees for up to 3 months, they decided to pay there most productive team over the next 3 months and instead of spending there work days with the company they will be doing work in the community with non profit organizations. The key issue is that there is a miscommunication between the employees and the company and the company didn’t fully communicate what they were actually intending to do which caused the employees to not be happy. The solution that was given to them only caused resistance between the employees and the company simply because they were not aware of the problems that where occurring in the company. Instead of being told of the incident the employees received a memo with a solution. Given the idea the employees felt as if this was a step away from their termination from the manufacturing company. That being said Employees also faced challenges that hindered them even if they wanted to do the job, which where transportation because of the location of some of the events. Which brings me to the second issue, which is the company’s schedule of community service events. By the company only addressing their problems they neglected the needs of their employees because they didn’t see how it would affect them psychologically. The events conflicted with many of the employee’s schedules and are a human relations and safety issue the compa...
There are many questions surrounding the moral responsibility on corporations, but how can a resolution be reached. In the case study for Timothy & Thomas North America, three models of ethical standards will be cited. From the Stakeholders article, decision-making guidelines will need to be understood for Jonathan Stein, the new Vice President (VP) of International Contracts to have a clear vision of
Whenever we fight for clean drinking water, or clean air, or a safe workplace, we are likely to find a corporation on the other side of the issue. The goal of a corporation is, first, to survive, and, second, to return a profit to its shareholders, not to mention for money and if the air has to be fouled to accomplish these goals, then the air will be fouled. Meaning, the corporations will do anything to keep these goals even if it means that they have to cause pollution or some issues. Pollution is one of the problems by the corporations that affect us. The Business Council for Sustainable Development thinks of this as ?gToday, for instance, the earth's atmosphere is providing the valuable service of acting as a dump for pollutants; those enjoying this service rarely pay a reasonable price for it,". This is an example of corporations ?gexternalizing?h their costs. By using the air as a free dump, corporations are able to get away with paying the costs for waste disposal to the people while they prof...
Anglo American is a UK public limited company headquartered in London. It is one of the world’s leading mining companies and it operates around the world especially in the continent of Africa where 76% of its workers live. Anglo American is a major producer of minerals such as diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore and coal. In 2008, a report by Mr. Philip Mattera, a private investigator, investigates the track record of Anglo American. He claimed the company has a series of abuse of labour rights, safety and environmental protection, to name a few in the past (Mattera, 2008). The Renewable Resources Coalition and Nunamta Aulukestai commissioned the report in which both are pressure groups opposing a project by Anglo American in Alaska (Mattera, 2008). This paper will focus on the labour issues claimed by the report based on the corporate social responsibility frameworks of utilitarian, libertarian and deontology.
Corporate sustainability is a combination of economics, social and environment concerns. A company which is sustainable and successful in the long-term need to satisfy all of its economic, legal, ethical and discretionary responsibilities thus it can thrive no matter how changing the industry, society and physical environment become. (Wheelen, pg. 73) Darden has recently encountered many sustainability issues like incorporating with suppliers who have unethical practises. Some of Darden’s suppliers lack of ethical and humane treatment of animals in the supply chain. Also, they overuse antibiotics in farm animals that lead to the risk
Toyota Motor Corporation demonstrates a high degree of ethical and social responsibility. Not only is Toyota one of the first auto manufacturers to offer hybrid technolo...
I wanted to follow-up on our discussion about union decertification and antitrust suits. Please forgive me if you already are aware of this.
Unocal is an oil company that was faced with an ethical dilemma. The owners and managers of this company wanted to invest money in Yadana project, and then got enormous profit. They knew that the government of the country, where this project was took place, violated the human rights of the local people. Unocal had evidence of these actions, but they decided to invest money in this project. To determine if their actions were ethical or not, we need to look at this problem from four different perspectives: utilitarian, rights, justice, and ethics of care.
Ethical decisions need to be based on facts, have consistency, and ensure that all stakeholders have clarity with the mission. If the leader doesn’t feel comfortable still with the facts that are presented to them, they should seek their colleague’s opinion by involving them in making a collective and considered decision. If the leader has a mentor that they have asked for their input from before, the leader must ask them-selves, “Would my mentor come up with the same decision.” If the decision isn’t a resounding “yes,” then the leader may need to rethink their decision. Decisions always need to be carefully reviewed and considered, but a leader should set a goal for the decision to become effective and not prolong it.
In today’s fast paced business world many managers face tough decisions when walking the thin line between what’s legal and what’s socially unacceptable. It is becoming more and more important for organisations to consider many more factors, especially ethically, other than maximising profits in order to be more competitive or even survive in today’s business arena. The first part of this essay will discuss managerial ethics[1] and the relevant concepts and theories that affect ethical decision making, such as the Utilitarian, Individualism, Moral rights approach theories, the social responsibility of organisations to stakeholders and their responses to social demands, with specific reference to a case study presenting an ethical dilemma[2], where Mobil halts product sales to a garage, forcing the garage owner to stop selling solvents to young people. The second section of this essay will focus on advice that should be given to any manager in a similar position to the garage owner with relevance to the organisational strategic management, the corporate objective and the evaluation of corporate social performance by measuring economic, legal, ethical and discretionary responsibilities. It will address whom to think of as stakeholders and why the different aspect could cost more than a manager or an organisation could have imagined.