Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Persuasive writing
Persuasive strategies in english writing
Persuasive writing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Persuasive writing
Upon considering this assignment, many ideas have developed and then been re-developed to address the points that are the desired outcome. The opportunity to have one’s personal thoughts considered and applied for persuasive analysis over any academic achievement deserves much thought. Additionally, to reflect upon each assignment, provide honest analysis, and determine the real worth as personally valued, is not as easy as one may think. As with any subjective process, it is necessary to explore many avenues to ascertain the best evidentiary route. In development of such a task, one must tread carefully upon the waters of rhetoric. One most balance attempting to isolate the situation at hand, yet, avoid ad misericordiam. However, as Professor Lloyd Bitzer points out, “A rhetorical situation has five elements” (Bitzer 27). While exploring the exigence of this topic, the constraints and the author require additional expansion as motives, and values of the author are of importance. Additionally, the circumstances, events, and people (emphasis added), play an important role as it pertains to the constraints (Wood 28). To paraphrase, it is about people. It is also about our interactions, our active engagement in dialogue and concepts believed, possibly redefined. Upon exploring these concepts, emphasis in the area of people is of prominence. Such as recalling a conversation upon the departing of a class in which two students share a moment of motorcycle enthusiasm. A mere offering of advice can turn into a lifelong flash of regret. The utterance of “Out of all my friends, I am the only one that never went down on a bike, that’s why I gave them up— so be careful.” just seem so inappropriate as things turned out. In regards to the cur...
... middle of paper ...
...and I have written persuasive arguments. I can almost cringe at the idea that I never really ever considered the other side, addressed the other side, or even cared about the other side. When I reflect back on some major writing assignments in my career, I now think of what my audience thought reading what I now would label propaganda. Therefore, I consider what I will take away from this class, which is future writing success, and worth an “A.”
Works Cited
Bitzer, Professort Lloyd. "The Rhetorical Situation" -Essentials Of Argument -Second Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education , Inc., 2009.
NASA. NASA Study finds increasing Solar Trend. 2003. 15 June 2011 .
Wood, Nancy V. Essentials Of Argument-Second Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc., 2009.
In a persuasive essay, these are excellent forms of appealing to the audience and guiding them to follow the line of thinking Worthen has. She begins with an anecdote to introduce her struggle as a professor, drawing the readers from the very beginning. With the readers reeled in, Worthen is able to explain how professors understand lecturing to truly be. She emphasizes how they have the best intentions for their students, wanting to push them harder and further than they could imagine. Worthen tied her evidence with every argument that she posed to her reader. Her use of expert opinions stand out due to her frequent use of them. She interviewed an array of professors, along with a student to help emphasis how lecturing has really expanded their horizons of teaching and learning, respectively. Although the evidence may seem a bit faulty due to it strictly coming from her opinions, she does an excellent job tying it with the expert onions she has gathered from different professors. Worthen also gives a student input to help validate all these ideas from the perspective of a former
Heinrichs begins by explaining the art of rhetoric and laying out the basic tools of argument. He emphasizes the importance of using the proper tense to avoid arguing the wrong issue. Furthermore, he introduces logos, ethos and pathos and shows how to “wield” each rhetorical tool. In Part 2, Heinrichs discusses common logical fallacies as well as rhetorical fouls. He remarks rhetoric’s single rule of never arguing the inarguable and demonstrates how ethos helps to know whom to trust. In Part 3, Kairos becomes an important tool for knowing the right time to persuade one’s audience. In Part 4 of the novel, the author provides examples of how to use rhetorical tools previously introduced in the
Ramage, John D., John C. Bean, and June Johnson. Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings. 9th ed. Boston: Pearson Education, 2012. Print.
he evaluation of the overall rhetorical effectiveness for intended audience was a failure starting with the ethos of having no much credibility for the author, pathos, no real connection to emotion to aid the doctor, and not being able to see the real problem, and with the lack of logos to explain how to be able to obtain aid and help the student improve. As a result, in the editorial the authors had no success in persuading all the audience. For that reason, college students should be able to see the correct way to write their essay and the effective method for them to pass class with excellent essays.
Crusius, Timothy W., and Carolyn E. Channell. The Aims of Argument: A Text and Reader. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2003. Print.
Making a good and persuasive argument is very much an acquired skill. It requires much practice and perfecting. It takes more than just having passion and making good points. Just because a person is passionate about the topic or has supporting details does not mean they can make a successful argument. Much more thought and skill is required. Gordon Adams, in his letter to the Arizona State University standards committee, demonstrates this quite well. Gordon Adams writes a passionate argument, yet his argument lacks several critical aspects.
Student's Book of College English: Rhetoric, Reader, Research Guide and Handbook. Boston: Pearson Learning Solutions, 2012. 402-405.
Previous to this course, I had never been exposed to rhetoric, nor did I understand rhetoric and its influence the first time it was introduced to me. In addition to having limited exposure to rhetoric, this was my first real writing assignment for an AP course. The process I used to complete this essay is far different from the process I’ve developed throughout this school year. I allowed my anxiety to override my brain, resulting in me stressing myself throughout the whole writing process. Rather than accepting that I am good enough for an AP course, I doubted my writing skills and drove myself crazy by second-guessing every word and phrase I typed. I relentlessly researched rhetoric, vocabulary, and other writing knowledge, which would be beneficial for the future, but I let all of the writing skills I had not yet acquired prevent me from using the skills I did have to write a great essay. Now, I type everything I have to say about the essay topic and then review my work only fixing what needs to be fixed. At this point in time I had difficulty quoting text; I had to learn how to stop drop quoting and when to use brackets, commas, and ellipses. Looking back on this essay, I wish I had taken notes on the text, as it would have made analyzing structure far easier. I also wish I had asked for help when I felt unsure about rhetoric rather than trying to find answers
... a Moral Monstrosity.” In Dynamic Argument. Ed. Robert Lamm and Justin Everett. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2007. 425-26.
Lochhead, Carolyn. A Legacy of the Unforeseen. 2006. Elements of Argument: A Text and Reader. By Annette T. Rottenberg and Donna Haisty. Winchell. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martins, 2009. 706-10. Print.
* The Aims of Argument. 4th ed Ed.Timothy W. Crusius and Carolyn E. Channell. New York:McGraw Hill,2003, 352-355.
Inch, Edward, Barbara Warnick. Critical Thinking and Communication: The use of Reason in Argument. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2002.
This year, I have learned a lot about my strengths as well as my weaknesses. I believe one of my biggest weakness is that I am a slow writer; it take a long time to put my thoughts into words that represent what I want to convey. I feel I could also improve upon my elaboration of more in depth information that I want the reader to know. It can usually never be disadvantageous to add more details into my writing. One of my strengths would include, that persuasive writing comes naturally to me because I find enjoyment in participating in civil arguments. Since, I have a background in public debate and have practiced using persuasive techniques in my writing and speech, I have little to no issues and I rarely catch myself using any form a logical fallacies in my writing. I think that practicing different forms of writing has strengthened and created a strong foundation for my future writing, from argumentative essays to rhetorical analysis’ to research papers.
In this week's material , we discuss the process and strategies for writing negative and persuasive messages thoroughly. The 3-step writing process was a highly significant factor in creating both negative and persuasive messages. As stated in the chapters, it is important to be clear and honest and provide evidence to build credibility whether one is giving bad news or persuading someone. The material also touches on ethics and etiquette and proper ways of handling situations such as rejections, negative information, faulty logic, and credibility.
Miller has written for Newsweek, where this article comes from. He has also written writing handbooks, such as Motives for Writing (McGraw-Hill) and Hodges’ HarBrace Handbook (Harcourt College Publishers). He is an educator in argument techniques, writing Informed Argument: A Multidisciplinary Reader and Guide.