Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Motivation within an organization
Motivation within an organization
Motivation within an organization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Motivation within an organization
The level of competition in the corporate world has prompted firms to embrace motivation strategies to encourage their employees with an aim of ensuring that quality services are offered to consumers. To attain this, firms have been prompted to initiate mechanisms that make their workplace desirable so that employees may be motivated to work efficiently and apply their skills optimally. Unlike past days when most firms regarded employees as just part of the inputs required in the production process of goods and services, it is now apparent that they are valued as the human capital without which an organization cannot attain its goals. There are a number of theories that have been used to explain the need for employee recognition and engagement, for instance: equity theory, two factor theory, expectancy valence theory and need hierarchy theory. Motivation of employees should be the primary focus for managers by offering: equity, support to employee aspirations and goals, good remuneration, and skill enhancement through continuous training.
The equity theory shows how employee performance is greatly influenced by the manner in which his peers are treated. For instance, firms that treat employees differently affect the motivation of employees by making it difficult for them to engage in teamwork or working effectively. This often happens in an environment where individuals holding certain positions are treated as more superior due to their closeness to managers in contrast to others occupying similar positions. This trend is detrimental. According to Kim (2006), the influences managers have in determining the behavior exhibited by their employees often define whether their firms are headed for failure or success. In most cases, moti...
... middle of paper ...
...vation of their employees. All the theories brought forth regarding employee motivation rotate on the need to make sure that employees are fully satisfied by offering both monetary and non-monetary incentives such as training, promotion and a safe working environment. It is often difficult for employees to devote themselves and engage fully in teamwork activities whenever their leaders favor some of their counterparts while showing bias against others. As the Two Factor Theory puts it, employee satisfaction and dissatisfaction have to be handled separately to ensure that the right measures are initiated whenever there are challenges that jeopardize the prospect of organizations attaining their goals. It is therefore the role of managers to make the environment of their workplaces ethical to attain the level of motivation needed to make employees perform effectively.
Employee engagement is shaped by many internal and external variables. Basic needs such as fair pay and safe working conditions were primary considerations in the late 1800s. Early theorists focused primarily on the individual and theories and research centered on individual motivation and outcomes. Significant work was spent on reshaping tasks to improve productivity and output. As safe working conditions and fair pay became commonplace, different variables such as job enrichment and personal growth became important for individual workers.
There are many motivational theories thought to be the key source of employee engagement. The expectancy theory of motivation ultimately suggests that human beings are driven to accomplish a goal not only because it is perceived as desirable, but also because the goal appears to be achievable. The goal setting theory of motivation suggests that goals need to be clear and measurable. The equity theory of motivation is “based on the idea that individuals are motivated by fairness, and if they identify inequities in the input/output ratios of themselves and their referent group, they will seek to adjust their input to reach their perceived equity” (Hawks, n.d.). Finally, psychological empowerment suggest that all employees have some basic needs that must first be satisfied in order to provide the framework for further motivation and empowerment. The pay for performance strategy used by American Express encompasses many of the motivational theories represented above. Most importantly, the expectancy theory, as this theory recognizes that employee behavior is directed toward a goal that is both desirable and
One of the most important theories of HRM (Human Resource Management is that of ‘Motivation’. The purpose of this theory is to explain the role of an organisation in order to encourage its people to put in the best of their efforts and abilities in a way that will help further in achieving better outcomes for the business and organisation’s goals(Armstrong, 2001). There are various techniques that can be adopted to motivate people for instance, rewards, punishments, actions to satisfy needs, psychological processes etc. This world is developing at a rapid pace and due to this development and quick changes; new ways of working and managing organisations
Motivation is not something that comes easily. More times than not motivation comes in spurts. When those times happen, it is imperative to make sure that one takes full advantage of the rare time. According to the online site, Business Dictionary, motivation is defined as both internal and external factors that stimulate desire and energy in people to be continually interested and committed to a job, role or subject or to make an effort to attain a goal.
Motivation is the psychological process that drives and directs an individual’s towards achieving particular goals (Buford, Bedeian, & Lindner, 1995): an internal drive to accomplish the unsatisfied desires (Higgins, 1994). In other words, motivation is the internal vigor to acquire desired needs and attain personal or organizational targets. According to Smith (1994), motivation is an important factor for a company’s survival in the current dynamic society since highly motivated employees are more productive. Thus, the question of how to improve motivation is a complex question that management should take into consideration. Employees’ motivation are influenced by diverse factors, like their needs, work environment and target performance, if managers want to enhance employee motivation, they should understand employees’ motivation in different aspects. There are four main theories, which are Abraham Maslow’s Hierarchy of needs, Frederick Herzberg’s two-factor theory, Victor Vroom’s expectancy theory and John Stacey Adams’ equity theory. Maslow and Herzberg’s theories concentrate on satisfying people’s needs to enhance their motivation, which are known as content theories. However Vroom and Adams’ theories recognize the complexity of motivation, which are process theory, they assume employees are motivated by their own performance. This essay will compare the similarities and differences between these four theories and articulate how management can critically use these theories to motivate employees.
“Equity considerations play a major role not only in the evolution of distributive systems but all in the emergence of supporting ideologies and the processes through which distributive systems are challenged and replaced” (Cook,K.S., & Parcel, T.L. 1997, p.2). Therefore, when the employees are rewarded for their work they will most likely work harder to restore the balance of equity. Whereas if an employee is under rewarded the employee will most likely do the opposite and not work as hard. The ongoing issue at Engstrom Auto Mirror Plant was that the employees were being under- rewarded and not appreciated by upper management, which lead to low productivity that severely impacted the companies
Motivation play an important role in today’s work environment as motivated employees are more productive employees. However, the ways how we motivate the employees have to be improved from time to time as employees are being more demanding and that they are more concern about their needs than before. Motivational strategies have probably affected the most by employee concerns and values (Greiner 1986, p. 82). ‘A motivational strategy is any effort to induce employees to initiate and sustain activities that can directly or indirectly improve service productivity’ (Greiner 1986, p. 82). Motivation can have an effect on the output of your business and concerns both quantity and quality. For example, if you are in a manufacturing company, your business actually relies heavily on your production staff to make sure that quality product are being produce and being delivered to your client at the right time. However, if your production employees are lack of motivation they will be not motivated to produce the amount of product demanded, thus will be very costly. In the essay below, we will be discussing on the strength and weaknesses of McClelland’s acquired needs theory and the expectancy theory.
Employee Motivation: A Powerful New Model? Harvard Business Review. Latham G.P. and Pinder C.C. (2005). The 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary'. Work Motivation Theory and Research at the Dawn of the Twenty-First Century.
Dwight D. Eisenhower once said, “Motivation is the art of getting people to do what you want them to do because they want to do it.” Studies have found that high employee motivation goes hand in hand with strong organizational performance and profits. Therefore, managers are given the responsibility of finding the right combination of motivational techniques and rewards to satisfy employees’ needs and encourage great work performance. This becomes a bit more challenging as employees’ needs change from one generation to another. Three of the biggest challenges a manager faces in motivating employees today are the economy and threats to job security, technological advances, and company cultures that primarily focus on the bottom line.
Employee motivation has always been a central problem in the workplace, and, as an individual in a supervisory position, it becomes one’s duty to understand and institute systems that ensure the proper motivation of your subordinates. Proper motivation of employees can ensure high productivity and successful workflow, while low worker motivation can result in absenteeism, decreased productivity rates, and turnover. A large body of research has been produced regarding motivation, and much of this research is applicable to the workplace. Due to the nature of man, motivation varies from individual to individual, and, because of this, there is no one system that is the best for ensuring worker motivation in every organizational situation, and, as a product, many theories have been created to outline what drives people to satisfactorily complete their work tasks. Throughout the course of this document, the three main types of these motivational theories will be outlined and examples of each, as well as how these theories can be used to further strengthen and sustain worker motivation....
Research has shown that motivation in an employee is an important factor which determines his performance. Motivation is the “driving force within individuals” (Mullins, 2007, p. 285). It is the concerned with finding out the reasons which shape and direct the behaviour of the individuals. The people act to achieve something so that they can satisfy some needs (Gitman and Daniel, 2008). It is important for the manager to understand this motivation of individual employees in order to inspire them and devise an appropriate set of incentives and rewards which would satisfy the needs that they have individually (Kerr, 2003). Once these needs are expected to be met in return for some specific behaviour or action, they would work more diligently to have that behaviour in them and to achieve that objective (Meyer and Hersovitch, 2001). Since it would lead to early and fuller achievement of the company objectives as the individual would work more diligently, it would lead to better organizational performance (Wiley, 1997).
A leader has the most important key environmental factors that impacts employees’ motivation. Leaders can motivate the employees or demoralize them through their own attitudes towards employees, how they relate with them and even the work environment. Employees need to be trusted and entrusted even with critical roles of the company. A leader can motivate employees by responsibly and accurately communicating employee responsibilities, giving them all information they need to perform a particular task (Stachowska and Czaplicka, 2017).. This is because employees want to feel part of the company and know about the happening of the company and have the right information to enable them make decisions concerning their work.
Ability in in turn depends on education, experience and training and its improvement is a slow and long process. On the other hand motivation can be improved quickly. There are many options and an uninitiated manager may even know where to start. As a guideline seven strategies for motivation.
Motivation is the process of getting someone to act on a particular situation. According to (Adelhardt, S, K. 2015, December 2) lack of motivation in the workplace is the most problematic subject for all managers, because it leads to decreasing productivity, performance and yet it increases the chances of employee resignation. Many employers suppose that managers these days are struggling to motivate their employees due to lack of significantly vital experience as well as knowledge in the employee engagement developing process. One of the successful strategies that managers can use to increase employee inspiration is by offering an attractive remuneration and benefits to their employees. Remuneration and benefits such as an extrinsic bonus
Motivation is an important function in organizations to motivate their employees for their ability to perform well, improving their skills, increasing productivity, job satisfaction and employee extension. Employees also are not a machines that we could just program their task in their brain and they will do it automatically, they require motivation to actually do their job properly. And so, after discussing the process models of the Maslow’s “Hierarchy of needs”, Douglas McGregor theory X and Y, and also the Herzberg’s “two factor motivation hygiene theory.” understanding the ways of motivating people, the human nature, and the substance of nature. I believe that the true motivation can only come from within and also managers can actually motivate all of their employees.