Zora Neale Hurston Sweat

847 Words2 Pages

When you read a story you aren’t necessarily completely caught up on the events proceeding to the start of the story. You usually have to be told by the author or by context clues what the backstory is. Sometimes this is not necessarily clear throughout the story. In the story Sweat by Zora Neale Hurston, she cleverly does this by adding a group of characters that allow the reader to be informed on the events leading up to the odd relationship between Delia and Sykes. They allow an easy transition in between stagnant parts of the story where the reader would normally be asking questions about the story to oneself. They add to the story’s smoothness and help to progress the story in a seamless and natural fashion without the author having to …show more content…

Right when you are coming up with the question that the story has brought out. Such as after the first section when we first see the manner in which Sykes treats Delia the men explain their relationship: “She better is she wanter eat, Syke Jones aint wuth de shot an’ powder hit would tek tuh kill ‘em. Not to huh he aint” (Hurston 106). He was saying this in response to one of the other men stating that no matter what the conditions are or the time of day, Delia is out everyday collecting and returning laundry. Even though his statement might be difficult to comprehend that one statement by itself provides us with alot of insight. It shows what kind of man Sykes is by telling us that she is the main provider for the family and he takes advantage of that and complains about the work she does and who she does it for. Where he has no right to, and the men on the porch realize what kind of man Sykes is and what he’s done to her, “Too much knockin’ will ruin any’oman” (Hurston 106). He beats her and has broken her down over the years they've been together. How else would we have been able to get this information unless these village men were there to tell …show more content…

This is a common theme in alot of old plays mainly used by the Greeks. In between scenes people would come out to interact with the audience and provide them with information that they predicted the audience would need or be wondering. That way the audience didn’t have a chance to get lost and fall behind throughout the play. We can see that completely inserted into this story with the group of men on the porch that break up the story into sections. When they break two sections apart they do so in a way that is smooth and seems like it fits in the story but it is really necessary for the story. We could not fully grasp the story and get its full meaning without the help and perspective of these

Open Document