You Ridiculed Fear By Tagore Summary

1465 Words3 Pages

As a result of colonialism, a culture of defensiveness and an inherent inferiority proliferated the oppressed. As Tagore writes, “You ridiculed Horror / By making your own appearance hideous; You cowed Fear / By heightening your menacing grandeur,” (15-18). Here, Tagore is describing the defensive nature borne out of the catastrophic reality of colonialism. A natural system of defense by the Africans was prompted. Also, the psychological effects of what prompted the defensive nature of the colonized are irreversible. Decades later, Fanon discusses these effects, saying, “Every effort is made to bring the colonized person to admit the inferiority of his culture which has been transformed into instinctive patterns of behavior, to recognize this …show more content…

It seems that that is the only way a nation can ever hope to regain their sense of identity. Continuing on with the role of the oppressed is the acknowledgment of past forms of resistance, as not failures. Fanon writes, “They fought as well as they could, with the arms that they possessed then; and if the echoes of their struggle have not resounded in the international arena, we must realize that the reason for this silence lies less in their lack of heroism than in the fundamentally different international situation of our time. It needed more than one native to say ‘We’ve had enough’; more than one peasant rising crushed, more than one demonstration put down before we could today hold our own, certain in our victory” (207). Without the resistance movements, there would be no movement today. Fanon is placing great importance on the past, as it is what is responsible for the present. In the same right, Thiong’o writes, “Our fathers fought bravely” (191). Those fighting colonialism in the past did what they could with what they had. It is, therefore, unfair to place blame on them for the current disfiguration of identity and culture. Pride for their efforts and trials should be declared. Acknowledgement of the times in which those fought in the past should also be noted as determining the efficacy of their attempts. According to Fanon, it required more than once voice, more than one objection to the current tide, for any sort of change to occur. Historically, this is the case for all major socio-political movements. When looking through the lens of identity, these efforts, whatever their efficacy, are what make up identity. It is weaved into the culture of a people, much like self-identity. Therefore, it is imperative that the oppressed continue to fight and respond to their oppressors. Whatever the results are of their fight, it will indefinitely

Open Document