Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why is literature important
Why is literature important
Life of pi summary essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why is literature important
Life of Pi author Yann Martel has been quoted as saying that fiction is “the selective transforming of reality, the twisting of it to bring out its essence”. The meaning of this quote can be regarded in two slightly different ways, mainly depending on whether or not you’re looking for the in-text or the out-of-text meaning. In-text, Martel is referring to the second version of Pi’s story. The story is made up by Pi in retaliation to investigators, Okamoto and Chiba telling him his original story wasn’t believable enough, and that they felt that Pi was lying to him. Their accusations and doubts of his sincerity enrage Pi, and he concludes that they want to hear a story that is unsurprising, flat, immobile, and most importantly, without animals. …show more content…
After hearing both stories, Pi asks them which they liked better, and when they admit that they liked the version with animals more, Pi responds with, “Thank you. And so it goes with God,” (Martel 317). I believe that this quote means basically the same thing both in-text and out-of-text; that one must have faith. In-text, faith is what helped Pi keep his original story with the animals in print instead of the fictional one with the chef. Despite the story without animals being more realistic, both Okamoto and Chiba had faith that the story with animals was real, therefore they liked it much better and in the end, they used the details from that version t write their report. They believed that the only reason Pi made it out of his situation alive is because he had faith in God, and they in return had faith in him and his story. Out-of-text, I believe Pi’s quote refers to those who have been through incredibly traumatic events, especially events that have caused people to make decisions they usually wouldn’t. When a person goes through something that forces them to go against their moral and spiritual beliefs, that person usually ends up feeling an overwhelming guilt for having done so. The answer that many people who have been in these types of situations come to is faith; by turning to God and asking for His forgiveness, their guilt eases away and is replaced by a sense of understanding. They know that while they may have sinned, they have been forgiven and are still good in the eyes of God. I feel that in this context, the words, “And so it goes with God”, specifically mean that the person is leaving their woes with God and moving on with their
The author provides this cruel story to make readers completely have another understanding of the first story: Richard Parker is exactly Pi’s alter ago. Behind the same law of the jungle, instead of saying the animals are metaphor of human beings in the first story, it is better to say the people in the second story have different animals’ characteristics. Consequently, when Pi asked those two Japanese that which story they preferred, they both agreed with “the story with animals”, “and so it goes with God.”
Storytelling is a way of expressing one’s imagination through fanciful adventures and serve a variety of purposes. One important reason is to capture a special moment and endure it but mostly because it unites us and of course entertains us. In Yann Martel’s Life of Pi, and Tim Burton’s The Big Fish, storytelling is seen as more important than the truth. Throughout the novel Life of Pi, and the film The Big Fish, it can be argued that the truth is intertwined with the lies in each story to form a new kind of truth. An example of this would be when Pi retells his story to the two Japanese men in a way in which he makes the animals human and introduces a different version of the truth. Both the film and movie also share a unique way of story telling because what they both share is a common moral “quest” which involves the main character, who is usually the hero, must overcome challenges in order to achieve a goal or reward at the end.
...ieve what I see” as the basis for all justification is unreasonable though because not everyone has seen every fact known to man. Simply believing everything Pi has told them would be irrational due to lack of scientific evidence. There is a lot more to prove that Pi’s condition just prompted him to create such an incredible story to deal with the immense tragedies he was put through.
The definition of story is “an account of imaginary or real people and events told for entertainment,” and both of these novels take this term to heart. Using their stories to hide their pain and emotions, it is easier to come up with a majestic tale then to tell the cold hard truth. In Life of Pi the author says, “That’s what fiction is about, isn't it, the selective transforming of reality? The twisting of it to bring out its essence,” (vi) and that is something both Edward Bloom and Pi Patel doesn’t. Despite Life of Pi and Big Fish’s obvious differences, they have one thing in common they both revolve around the topic of story telling. The novels are about struggling to come to terms with reality and being stuck
Imagine if a young Indian boy who was lost at sea told you that he spent Almost a year living on an 8 by 26 foot lifeboat with a Bengal tiger. Do you think you would believe his story, or would you think it was all a part of his imagination? In the novel ”Life of Pi” , The protagonist tells the readers two different stories and gives them the option to choose which story they believe is the real one. He gave one story including animals and bizarre events, and another story that included other humans and events that seemed more realistic. Although the second story he told seemed more likely to really happen, The first story he told, which included Richard Parker, is the real story of what happened.
Aesthetically, the fiction which reveals a truth by explicit sermonising rather than as a natural conclusion drawn from the relationships and events it presents, is displeasing, even "immoral." Indeed, Martel's statement is likely to have the opposite effect on his reader, provoking a determined counter-reaction not to succumb to a didactic religious agenda. Surely enough, Life of Pi fails to meet its ambition. As he travels through its pages, apparently on the Damascun road to enlightenment, the reader will not, atheist or already committed follower, experience some major revelation to the spirit, coming to, or restoring, a belief in God.
Religion is and always has been a sensitive topic. Some choose to acknowledge that there is a God and some choose to deny this fact to the death. For those who deny the presence of a higher being, “Life of Pi” will most likely change your thought process concerning this issue. Yann Martel’s, “Life of Pi”, is a compelling story that shows the importance of obtaining religion and faith. Piscine (Pi) Patel is both the protagonist and the narrator of Martell’s religious eye-opener who undergoes a chain effect of unbelievable catastrophes. Each of these catastrophic events leaving him religiously stronger because he knows that in order to endure what he has endured, there has got to be a God somewhere.
Pi starts a story without animals in which a French Cook, a sailor with a broken leg and his mother are with him on the lifeboat. The cook cuts off the sailor’s leg and eats him, scaring Pi. Later Pi’s mother and the cook have an argument which leads the cook to kills Pi’s mother, throwing her head to Pi. After, Pi kills the cook. Mr. Okamoto notices the similarities in the stories the two men don’t know what to believe. They continue to question for details about the actual sinking of the ship. Pi requests that they choose which story they like best. The two men enjoy the first story, to which causes Pi to begin to cry.
Pi miraculous journey was as emotionally draining as physical. Pi animal story gives great insight of his spiritual journey whereas the human story was gruesome, harsh and straight to the point. “I was giving up. I would have given up – if a voice hadn 't made itself heard in my heart. The voice said, "I will not die. I refuse it. I will make it through this nightmare. I will beat the odds, as great as they are. I have survived so
...h up their session, Pi asks them, “‘So tell me, since it makes no factual difference to you and you can’t prove the question either way, which story do you prefer?’” The factual or provable existence of God is not necessarily relevant to whether someone should believe in Him. This requirement of proof for belief is typical of the agnostic, whose sole belief is that he or she cannot believe either way because there is no proof either way. However, life is a story, and in real life, there must be a story to tell. When it comes to Life of Pi, there is hardly any difference between life and story, so how could the novel not mimic life, being the story of a life itself? A life perhaps embellished to become better, just as readers must embellish their own lives in favor of the better story.
The Life of Pi, written by Yann Martel, is the story of a young man, Piscine, or Pi for short, who experiences unbelievable and unrealistic events, which are so unrealistic ambiguity is aroused amongst the reader. Duality reoccurs over the course of the novel through every aspect of Pi’s world view and is particularly seen in the two contradictory stories, which displays the brutal nature of the world. Martel wonderfully crafts and image of duality and skepticism though each story incorporated in this novel.
His love and understanding of zoology was the reason he survived on the life raft. Even though Pi went against his morals and ate meat, Pi saw it as necessary to survive. His will to survive and to eliminate all personal boundaries allowed him to do what ever deed needed to survive. And finally using his knowledge of animals as a means of maintaining a psychological level of sanity, which kept him motivated and sane throughout his time at sea. With the extreme circumstances that Pi lived through, and the means he used to cope with them, it is obvious that his choices were
In Life of Pi, Pi is influenced by the decisions that animals make while onboard the lifeboat and the humanlike characters that they represent in Pi’s factual story. Many readers believe that the story of the animals is just a figment of Pi's imagination and that it was just something to keep him alive. Others believe that the story of the animals really did happen in Pi's time on the Pacific Ocean. No one will ever know what the real story of Pi's journey was, but everyone who has heard about Pi's multiple stories will have their own opinions and interpretations of what really happened.
In the first place, Pi spends more time telling the animal story, instead of the true account, which shows that he prefers a zebra, a tiger, a hyena, and an orangutan over the real people involved because with real people the tragic events must also be real. While telling his story to the two Japanese men investigating him once he
In conclusion, the main idea in Life of Pi is that having the will to survive is a key component to survival. The three ways this is shown is through symbolism of the colour orange, having religion on the protagonist’s side and the thirst and hunger experienced by the protagonist. Things do not always happen the way one would want them to happen: “Things didn’t turn out the way they were supposed to, but what can you do? You must take life the way it comes at you and make the best of it” (101) Faith determines ones destiny and nothing can be changed about that, one can live their life to the fullest and enjoy every moment and not regret it. No matter what faith throws at one, as long as they have the will to survive they can pull through anything.