Ww2 Pros And Cons

499 Words1 Page

August 6th, 1945 and August 9th, 1945 were the two worst days for Japan, but two amazing days for the United States of America. The attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki had pros (for USA), and had cons (for Japan). It destroyed two cities of Japan, and killed many innocent civilians, but on the other side, it ended the war for USA. I created two biased propaganda posters. The first poster is about how USA would look at the bombings, and the second poster is about how Japan would look at the bombings. For the first poster, the central message is that that USA always wins, and to never mess with them. I said “VICTORY FOR USA ONCE AGAIN”, because USA “always wins”. In WW1, USA came into the war and they thought that they were the ones who ended the 4 year war. I also …show more content…

The large text in the middle of the poster is “NOW WHO’S THE MONSTER?” I wrote that because Japan were being called monsters for what they did in Nanking (assaulted and killed innocent people) . In the poster, the statement “NOW WHO’S THE MONSTER?” refers to USA being monsters because they killed thousands of innocent civilians and destroyed two of Japan’s cities. On every corner, I wrote what happened, but only the bad things because it is biased towards the Japanese. I put two pictures in my poster. The top picture is Hiroshima after the bombing, and the second image is of Nagasaki after the bombs was dropped. Finally, the poster plays on the emotion of guilt. The point of the poster is to show USA that what they did was not right, and they could have found other ways to win the war. It is trying to make them feel guilty of what they did, and the outcomes of the bombings. In conclusion, both posters had different bias opinions. The first poster was on America’s side, and the second poster was favouring Japan. Both of these posters are forms of propaganda because it includes different emotions, biases, aspects and

Open Document