Written Report of a Human Service Program
While interviewing a Children Social Worker from the Department of Children and Family Services, Barbara Snell introduce me to the Wraparound and System of Care program for human service workers.
A brief history of Wraparound legislation in California
• In July 1996, after 3 years of intensive effort by EMQ and its partners (the Social Services Agency, Department of Mental Health and Probation, and the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors), Gov. Pete Wilson signed into law AB 2297 which authorized a pilot project for California’s first Wraparound program.
• In 1998, Gov. Wilson signed SB 163 (California Title IV-E Child Welfare Waiver) a 5-year pilot for flexible use of RCL 12-14 foster care funding
…show more content…
It serves children and families in any geographical area of the County. The facilitators are Case Management-oriented children social workers who provide “no eject or on reject” services on a 24 hour, 7 day a week basis. The Public Wraparound program focuses on children who are at Metropolitan State Hospital and children placed in residential treatment facilities for more than one year. Wraparound goal of the process is permanency for these children; therefore, the emphasis is on the child’s return to his or her community and not institutional care.
Wraparound and Systems of Care are two intensive, family centered programs focused on our highest need children as well as those from the Probation and the Department of Mental Health. Wraparound is available count-wide and targets children in or at risk of placement in Group Homes at a Rate classification level 12 or higher.
System serves children with slightly less intensive mental health needs who are transitioning from group care back to a family or who are “at risk” of disrupting in their current family based setting. Both programs require a willingness to participate on the part of the child and family, if one has been
…show more content…
The Child and Family Team must agree that the child and family requirements can be sufficiently served by other community low cost or no cost resources and supports. The Child and Family Team revises the Plan of Care as needed if the child and family are not making good progress. For any reason a child becomes hospitalized, runs away, or is temporarily detained in a County or State facility, the Child Family Team will continue to work to find a resolution to the crisis related issues and assist in preparing the family for the child’s return
The job of a child welfare worker appears to be a demanding profession that promotes the child’s safety, but also strengthens the family organization around them in order to successfully raise the children. This child welfare workers work in the system known as the Child Protective Services whose initiative is to protect the overall welfare of the child. The short novel From the Eye of the Storm: the Experiences of a Child Welfare Worker by Cynthia Crosson-Tower demonstrates the skills necessary to deal with the practice of social work along with both its challenges and its happy moments. The novel consists of some of the cases involving Tower’s actual career in social work. In reading the book, I was able to experience some of the actual cases in which children dealt with physical and mental abuse from their families that caused them to end up within the system. Also, some of these children had issues in adapting to foster and adoptive families based on the issues they faced earlier in life. As we have learned earlier in the course, the violence that a child experiences early in life has an overall affect on the person they become as they grow into adulthood. When children deal with adverse childhood experiences, they are at a higher risk for abusing drugs and/or alcohol, increased likelihood of abusing their own child or spouse, higher rates of violent and nonviolent criminal behavior, along with several other issues throughout their lifespan.
P1: To outline why children and young people may need to be looked after away from their families.
Child welfare system was originated with the goals that social workers would try and alleviate poverty and its impact; however as the years have passed, the child welfare system turned into a child protection system directed toward investigating abuse and neglect, and removing children from families and placing them in foster care, and is no longer prepared to assist in resolving the problems of child poverty (Lindsey, 2004). Child welfare system has been developed around the residual approach which demands that aid should be given only after the family is in crisis or other support groups have failed to meet a child’s minimal needs. However, over the years, there have been different focuses for the child welfare system, whether it involved
Many children across the country are wrongfully removed from their homes everyday by workers with an anti-family mindset, who use removal as a first resort not a last. It is not only detrimental to the child’s well-being, but is also immorally abusive to the child. The goal of the child welfare system is to promte safety, permanency, and wellness among all children.
They range from psychological resources like feelings of self-esteemed a sense of attachment, to accessing health care, schooling and opportunities to display their talents to others. “ (pg. 9). In the ECM 25 program, Amy has multiple options to choose from that she can choose that will best address her complex needs. The CAS worker has given her resources and information to get her own housing, to reside with her foster parent in a family based setting, or to reside in a group home with other youth. In addition, CAS worker has offered a family finding service for Amy to engage with extended family members and for the CAS to plan a family reunification if Amy chooses to. Moreover, CAS worker has provided Amy with counselling supports, subsidized daycare for her newborn, youth in care mentorship programs, and Amy has the discretion of choosing these supports which are managed by her CAS worker and foster parent, while she is focused on pursuing a career through
The Family-Centered approach to care is important to the delivery of behavioral health services for children and adolescents because it involves the families in their natural environments and allows the families to make decisions about their care. It promotes home and community based care by creating an equal partnership with the family to ensure optimal delivery of care at all levels (Brewer, McPherson, Magrab, & Hutchins, 1989). For children with special health care needs, such as mental or developmental disorders, coordinating care between all services and people can help to introduce flexible and reasonable ways of providing the maximum amount of care to children and families (Brewer, McPherson, Magrab, & Hutchins, 1989).
Dr. Hamilton, I am emailing you to update you on the anticipating changes in my project. These changes will be reflected in future assignments. The changes are including but not limit to the Freedom House of Miracles will be a 90 day program, and modified as an therapeutic community residential treatment program. The reason(s) is because of the implementation of the Wrapround service model. My project is an intervention structured program based on community-as-method, that is, the community is the treatment agent. These changes are necessary once my project was no longer a permanent housing treatment program. I will add and revise the goals and objectives to reflected these changes including transiting the residents to the next level upon
She wanted society to see how the DCFS workers are and what they are not doing to properly getting children placed in homes. She point out keynotes that emphasized that the reason that some of the improper placing is happening is simply because workers aren’t doing their job. They also worked with too many systems causing work to go missing. The article do not touch basis on family reunification which could possibly be the reason why DCFS workers are putting children in mental health hospitals and making them stay longer than they are needed. The author wanted the audience to know that the “children are suffering and there is a chronic shortage of placement for children in the foster care system” (Elieib,
Social services focus on sending kids away from abusive homes and jumping from one group home or institution to another instead of focusing on building families back up and solving the actual issue. A child can legally become uprooted from their home due to multiple things. The primary guardian has a drug problem, the living quarters obtain eviction, too many children in one group home, physical abuse, sexual abuse, neglect of any kid, incarceration, abandonment, truancy, death of primary guardian, voluntarily placed, the child continues to commit juvenile offenses or a runaway. Almost the majority of the latter listed can prevail placement in foster care. Instead of wasting another life in the failing system of foster care, child welfare can create programs to promote children’s rights.
Half the children in this country live in homes in which one or both parents work. Twelve million children in this country do not have health insurance, and over 4.5% of all children are victims of suspected child abuse or neglect (Doktor and Poertner). Believe it or not, these are all indicators of the demand for Family Resource Centers within our school systems. Many question whether Family Resource Centers are worth the money the state pours into them. However, in serving students, parents and teachers, there should be no question of their significance. Due to The Kentucky Education Reform Act in the early 1990's we have seen the development of Family Resource Centers in Kentucky, and they are fulfilling expectations and serve a valuable purpose in spite of some skepticism. Being a social work major and growing up in a school system under KERA, I know that family resource centers are important and that all parents, students and teachers need to be informed of all the good they do for a community. To address these points we will discuss the purpose of family resource centers the controversy that surround them and their effectiveness.
Downs-Whitelaw, S., Moore, E., &McFadden, E. J. (2009). Child welfare and family services: Policies and practice, USA: Parson Education Inc.
Addressing many of the determinants such as income and housing (Mikkonen, & Raphael, 2010) are effective ways to deal with prevention of mental health problems in younger children. These determinants are linked (based on class discussion) and form the underlying grounds for maltreatment and neglect leading to increased mental health problems in young children and ensuing foster care placement. Although this is significant, this paper has emphasized the growing number of young children already residing in foster care with increasing mental health needs. Early childhood development directly influences young children, especially ones in foster care. The current initiatives being implemented attempt organizational change yet occur at the interpersonal level and fail to address the gaps identified earlier. As with my experience at the Children’s Cottage, interventions were at the interpersonal level. While the caregivers had early childhood training, many were lacking in how to provide proper mental health care to the foster children that frequented the facility. In depth training on the complex issues that foster children face, such as maltreatment and neglect was overlooked. Therefore, in my opinion, building upon these interventions and applying them to an organizational level allows for the reduction and or resolution of those gaps. The organizational level has the ability to promote health on a wider scale (K. Raine, personal communication, November 15, 2013). Many families use organizations such as the Cottage thus, becoming prime opportunity for collectively changing/improving mental health for all young foster children.
174). Shea and Jackson (2015) research goal was to elicit the Family Mosaic Project (FMP) youths’ thoughts and feelings of their experience with this type of intervention (pg. 175). The FMP is a program that refers troubled youth to the Occupational Therapy Training Program (OTTP) from clinicians that work in schools, in communities or in detention facilities who are practitioners of the client-centered occupation-based therapy (Shea, Jackson, 2015, pg.174). FMP focus on changing behaviors of youth between the ages of 11 and 18 who are socially disadvantaged, by providing services such as intensive case management (Shea, Jackson, 2015, pg. 174). OTTP is a community-based program within FMP, that offers social activities that are pleasurable and meaningful to occupy severely troubled kids who are at risk for foster care (Shea, Jackson, 2015, pg. 174). Furthermore, the sample consisted of five participants of the FMP program and the demographics were gender, age, ethnicity, level of education and length in OTTP (Shea, Jackson, 2015, pg. 175). Qualitative research method was used to gather and analyze the verbal data of the research design (Shea, Jackson, 2015, pg. 174). Five semi-structured interviews were
Social agency and the court authorizing the placement, and caregivers are responsible for the continuing monitoring to ensure that the child in placement receives adequate care and supervision (Downs, Moore and McFadden, 2009, p.275). Services for children in foster care are a teamwork effort of the different parties involved (Downs, Moore and McFadden, 2009). Unfortunately in Antowne’s situation the agency and the court system failed him because although he was removed from his mother, the abuse and neglect continued. The systems involved did not provide the safety net Antwone needed.
A child and youth care professional can be described as a juxtaposition; an emotionally tough job with challenges, but incredibly rewarding and inspiring at the exact same time. Upon interviewing a child and youth care professional with 4 years of experience working in a group home, named Sarah Bakelaar at the Arrow Lodge in Edmonton, Alberta, on September 16th, 2015 at 3:30pm, it was evident that these workers require exceptional skills to help their clients. Arrow Lodge group home is an initiative through McMan Youth Family and Community Services Association throughout Alberta, serving the community by supporting individuals to reach their full potential. This particular Group Home, Arrow Lodge serves to provide a home to an all male clientele from the ages of 15-18 years of age.