Woodside Energy Case Study

1162 Words3 Pages

Who are the parties in the case? The plaintiff and buyer, Woodside Energy Ltd and others, a Western Australia gas supplier. The defendant and seller, Electricity Generation Corporation, trading as Verve Energy: a statutory corporation and major generator and supplier of electricity in the southwest of Western Australia. Verve uses natural gas under the gas supply agreement for all its power stations. From which court have the parties appealed to the High Court? The parties have appealed against the conclusion and reasoning of the Supreme Court of Western Australia (WASC). What are the facts of the case? Electricity Generation Corporation, trading as Verge Energy, a major Electricity supplier in Western Australia entered into a long term gas supply agreement (GSA) with Woodside Energy Ltd gas suppliers, the buyers. The sellers were obliged to provide the mandatory minimum daily quantity of gas. If the buyer indicated that it required gas beyond the …show more content…

The court concluded that the buyer was not obliged to nominate any supplemental maximum daily quantity from the sellers, the sellers had no obligation to save any daily capacity for the buyer and the buyer’s ‘take or pay obligation’ applied only to the maximum daily quantity of gas. The court held that it was not an absolute or unconditional obligation to use reasonable endeavors, the nature and extent of it is conditioned by what was reasonable in the circumstances. It was concluded that some contracts containing reasonable endeavors also have their own standard of what is reasonable, expressly referring to the business and trading interests of the obligee. Which judgment of the Australian High Court do you prefer?

Open Document