Wolves Pros And Cons

1139 Words3 Pages

As wolves can be known as livestock killers, we can change that by hunting them and lowering the population. Not lowering the population can plummet the local deer, elk, moose and sheep populations. If they are over populated, they can end up preying on other species to the point where there are few animals left. Although not hunting wolves can also have some benefits, it does have cons.
Having wolves, and not keeping check of the wolf population can cause them to over populate. Rapid growth is common in areas where there are lots of animals for them to eat. For example, Yellowstone wolf packs have grown, leading to many wolves roaming outside of the national park. There are known to be 1,700 in the Western states of Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, Oregon, and Washington. There has been many threats to livestock, such as killing and injuring of farm and ranch animals, which has …show more content…

Because of this, a hunting season was instituted in 2009. Experts say that the Gray wolf is no longer in danger of being completely wiped out by hunting. Before it was caused by unregulated hunting. Some have said that the wolves in Yellowstone were “significantly reduced” by hunting and trapping.
Officials in Montana have placed a quota on the number of wolves that could be shot by hunters. Four each season, to minimize the impact on wolf watching in Yellowstone park.
Ranchers nearby the Yellowstone park have been supportive of the expanded hunting, saying wolves are a real threat to their livestock. Jon Robinett, of Dubois, Wyoming, says, “I have lost hundreds of cattle, several horses, and six dogs to wolves over the past 20 years.”
He also stated that there was about 50 wolves around his part of Dunoir Valley and that hunters only taking out a little amount like four “won’t help”.
“Some seasons held in Montana and Idaho were successful with hunters killing up to 72 of the 75 wolves on quota in Montana. 188 of the 220-wolf quota in

Open Document