The overall objective of this experiment was to perform a Wittig reaction from creating an ylide and mixing it with a carbonyl (C=O) compound, cinnamaldehyde. The completion of the reaction was confirmed ultimately from the initial TLC analysis. Since TLC separates the components of the spotted material, as long as the retention factor values were different for cinnamaldehyde, the starting reagent, and the product(s), it was evident that some of the reaction had gone to completion. However, as seen in Figure 3, there was some blurred area between the product spots. This indicated that there still existed some impurities, most likely the starting reagent, which was affecting the movement of the compounds through the solvent, petroleum …show more content…
After performing the second TLC analysis (Figure 4), it was apparent that the product had purified because of the separation from the starting spot, unlike Figure 3. In addition, there was only spot that could be seen on the final TLC, indicating that only one isomer formed. Since (E,E) is the more stable isomer due to a less steric hindrance relative to the (E,Z) isomer, it can be inferred that (E,E) 1,4-Diphenyl-1,3-butadiene was the sole product. The proton NMR also confirmed that only (E,E) 1,4-Diphenyl-1,3-butadiene formed; based on literature values, the (E,E) isomer has peaks between 6.6-7.0 ppm for vinyl protons and 7.2-7.5 ppm for the phenyl protons. Likewise, the (E,Z) isomer has vinyl proton peaks at 6.2-6.5 ppm and 6.7-6.9 ppm in addition to the phenyl protons. The H NMR in Figure 5 shows multiplets only after 6.5 ppm, again confirming that only (E,E) 1,4-Diphenyl-1,3-butadiene formed. In addition, the coupling constant J of the (E,E) isomer is around 14-15 Hz, while for the (E,Z) isomer it is 11-12 Hz. Based on the NMR in Figure 5, the coupling constant is 15.15 Hz, complementing the production of (E,E)
The goal of this two week lab was to examine the stereochemistry of the oxidation-reduction interconversion of 4-tert-butylcyclohexanol and 4-tert-butylcyclohexanone. The purpose of first week was to explore the oxidation of an alcohol to a ketone and see how the reduction of the ketone will affect the stereoselectivity. The purpose of first week is to oxidize the alcohol, 4-tert-butylcyclohexanol, to ketone just so that it can be reduced back into the alcohol to see how OH will react. The purpose of second week was to reduce 4-tert-butylcyclohexanol from first week and determine the effect of the product's diastereoselectivity by performing reduction procedures using sodium borohydride The chemicals for this lab are sodium hypochlorite, 4-tert-butylcyclohexanone
2-ethyl-1,3-hexanediol. The molecular weight of this compound is 146.2g/mol. It is converted into 2-ethyl-1-hydroxyhexan-3-one. This compounds molecular weight is 144.2g/mol. This gives a theoretical yield of .63 grams. My actual yield was .42 grams. Therefore, my percent yield was 67%. This was one of my highest yields yet. I felt that this was a good yield because part of this experiment is an equilibrium reaction. Hypochlorite must be used in excess to push the reaction to the right. Also, there were better ways to do this experiment where higher yields could have been produced. For example PCC could have been used. However, because of its toxic properties, its use is restricted. The purpose of this experiment was to determine which of the 3 compounds was formed from the starting material. The third compound was the oxidation of both alcohols. This could not have been my product because of the results of my IR. I had a broad large absorption is the range of 3200 to 3500 wavenumbers. This indicates the presence of an alcohol. If my compound had been fully oxidized then there would be no such alcohol present. Also, because of my IR, I know that my compound was one of the other 2 compounds because of the strong sharp absorption at 1705 wavenumbers. This indicates the presence of a carbonyl. Also, my 2,4-DNP test was positive. Therefore I had to prove which of the two compounds my final product was. The first was the oxidation of the primary alcohol, forming an aldehyde and a secondary alcohol. This could not have been my product because the Tollen’s test. My test was negative indicating no such aldehyde. Also, the textbook states that aldehydes show 2 characteristic absorption’s in the range of 2720-2820 wavenumbers. No such absorption’s were present in my sample. Therefore my final product was the oxidation of the secondary alcohol. My final product had a primary alcohol and a secondary ketone
Wittig reactions allow the generation of an alkene from the reaction between an aldehyde/ketone and a ylide (derived from phosphonium salt).The mechanism for the synthesis of trans-9-(2-phenylethenyl) anthracene first requires the formation of the phosphonium salt by the addition of triphenylphosphine and alkyl halide. The phosphonium halide is produced through the nucleophilic substitution of 1° and 2° alkyl halides and triphenylphosphine (the nucleophile and weak base) 4 An example is benzyltriphenylphosphonium chloride which was used in this experiment. The second step in the formation of the of the Wittig reagent which is primarily called a ylide and derived from a phosphonium halide. In the formation of the ylide, the phosphonium ion in benzyltriphenylphosphonium chloride is deprotonated by the base, sodium hydroxide to produce the ylide as shown in equation 1. The positive charge on the phosphorus atom is a strong EWG (electron-withdrawing group), which will trigger the adjacent carbon as a weak acid 5 Very strong bases are required for deprotonation such as an alkyl lithium however in this experiment 50% sodium hydroxide was used as reiterated. Lastly, the reaction between ylide and aldehyde/ketone produces an alkene.3
The C-H (sp3) hydrogens from our product displayed at wavelength 2959 cm-1 correlates to the methyl groups located on the ends of isopentyl acetate4. A really prominent, strong peak located at 1742 cm-1 shows that a C=O ester stretch is located in the product, along with at 1244 cm-1 the spectrum shows a strong peak representing the C(=O)-O stretch that is crucial to the structure of isopentyl acetate. Shown in my IR spectrum is a weak O-H (H-bonded) peak at 3464 cm-1 which shows that I have an impurity of isopentyl alcohol in my product. Isopentyl alcohol has similar boiling points and density as my product so the impurity could have easily boiled out with the isopentyl acetate during distillation. The isopentyl alcohol was also present in my 1H-NMR spectrum backing up the impurity peak at 3464
In the aqueous Wittig reaction, a combination of other factors could further improve the reaction. These included the increase of temperature to distribute aldehyde molecules for reaction and the additive LiCl that stabilised phosphoranes to prevent reactions with water.10 In general, lithium cations could catalyse the condensation step by either facilitating the nucleophilic attack, or stabilising the betaine intermediate to provide an alternative pathway with lower energy of activation, thus shortening the reaction time and improving the final
Discussion and Conclusions: Interpreting these results have concluded that relative reactivity of these three anilines in order of most reactive to least reactive go; Aniline > Anisole > Acetanilide. Aniline, has an NH2 , the most active substituent , and adds to any ortho/para position available on the ring. This data is confirmed with the product obtained, (2,4,6 tribromoaniline, mp of 108-110 C). As for anisole, it has a strongly activating group attached, OMe an alkoxy group, and it added in two of the three available spots, both ortho. The results conclude: (2,4-Dibromoanisol mp 55-58 C ). Acetanilide has a strong activating group attached, acylamino group, but this group is large and the ortho positions are somewhat hindered so the majority of the product obtained added at the para position, results conclude: (p-bromoacetanilide mp 160-165 C). Since all the substituents attached to the aromatic rings were activators the only products able to be obtained were ortho/para products.
Some possible errors raised during the synthesis and spectrometric analysis of TPCP include the insufficient mixing of the hexane and TPCP, in which will result in the low absorbance of the compound. Additionally, the low yield is contributed from the loss of product during filtration.
The purpose of this lab was to perform an electro-philic aromatic substitution and determine the identity of the major product. TLC was used to detect unre-acted starting material or isomeric products present in the reaction mixture.
In a small reaction tube, the tetraphenylcyclopentadienone (0.110 g, 0.28 mmol) was added into the dimethyl acetylene dicarboxylate (0.1 mL) and nitrobenzene (1 mL) along with a boiling stick. The color of the mixed solution was purple. The solution was then heated to reflux until it turned into a tan color. After the color change has occurred, ethanol (3 mL) was stirred into the small reaction tube. After that, the small reaction tube was placed in an ice bath until the solid was formed at the bottom of the tube. Then, the solution with the precipitate was filtered through vacuum filtration and washed with ethanol. The precipitate then was dried and weighed. The final product was dimethyl tertraphenylpthalate (0.086 g, 0.172mmol, 61.42%).
The only difference between the two is that 4-phenylphenol has an OH bonded to one of the carbon rings. This makes 4-phenylphenol the more polar compound due to the electronegativity of the oxygen. Intermolecular forces such as hydrogen bonds and dipole–dipole interaction can aid in explaining the polarity difference. The dipole-dipole interaction that occurs happens due to the electronegativity difference between Oxygen and Hydrogen and creates partial charges on the atoms, aiding in attracting electrons. Hydrogen bonds can occur when a hydrogen atom interacts with a Nitrogen, Oxygen, or Fluorine of another molecule, and this interaction is one of the strongest intermolecular forces. Because these hydrogen bonds can occur the 4-phenylphenol will form intermolecular hydrogen bonds with the silica gel and therefore not move as far on the TLC plate. When looking at compound C we know understand that biphenyl would travel further than the more polar 4 –phenyl phenol. Understanding this, we would predict that compound B is the 4-phenylphenol and that the lower spot in C is 4-phenylphenol and the higher spot is biphenyl, since it will travel
Refer to Chemistry Lab # 2 – Investigating Changes. No changes have been made in this experiment. Methods = == ==
Maruzen Petrochemical Co., located in Tokyo, Japan, is the world leader in methyl ethyl ketone production. The Maruzen Petrochemical Co. patented process for producing methyl ethyl ketone is rather quite simple w...
EDTA Titrations [homepage on the internet]. No date. [cited 2014 Mar 24]. Available from: http://bionmr.unl.edu/courses/chem221/lectures/chapter-12.ppt.
The expected melting point of Semicarbazone of Cyclohexanone is 166°C.1 The assumed product is Semicarbazone of Cyclohexanone. Observed temperature being lower than the expected may indicate a contamination or an impurity. The low temperature result was shown to be more accurate than the room temperature result. Perhaps, in the room temperature, there was more of a mix in the products (i.e. containing both Semicarbazone of Cyclohexanone and Furaldehyde). This is reinforced by the pale yellow colour observed, when Semicarbazone of Cyclohexanone is supposed to be white. Room temperature result could be close to the eutectic point. This is kinetic control, as it is formed much quicker than the product of the high temperature reaction. To fix the problem of lower than expected melting point could be have a set temperature as to how cold the low temperature should be (e.g.