WikiLeaks: Moral agent or National Threat?

2358 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Ethics in journalism

This essay will offer a critical analysis of the 2010 WikiLeaks Controversy. For this paper, I will attempt to demonstrate different ethical standpoints of the controversy through a media case study. I will investigate if it was ethical for the media to collaborate in this agreement in order to figure out what kind of person Julian Assange was. The question of whether the media was being moral in this situation depends on the question of whether he is a hacker or a journalist. The title of a hacker receives negative backlash because whereas the title of a journalist receives positive feedback because a hacker has a very negative connotation of a criminal or even a spy whereas a journalist is seen in a positive light, of releasing truth to the public. From this, one could ask if what WikiLeaks did would be considered ethical? Was it moral for the media to cooperate? This all depends on what he did and who he is, this will make a difference and determine if it was ethical.
I chose the WikiLeaks controversy because I believe it illustrates how groundbreaking and newsworthy technology can be and the strong impact that can have on public life. Therefore, I will advocate that the publication was ethically sound because the knowledge of the public should be the number one priority. WikiLeaks is said to have generated the greatest confrontation between the established order of the government and the advocacy that can come from the internet. WikiLeaks is proof of the lengths people will go in order to find the truth and the results of that, all of which can be looked at using consequentialist theory. This paper will first outline the story of the controversy followed by micro and macro ethical concerns that are raised, morally relevant ...

... middle of paper ...

...plying the utilitarian principle short-term consequences should be balanced out with the long-term consequences. Utilitarianism focuses on what can be the best decision for the entire society. Keeping this in in mind, I would ask what has the greater overall benefit to the nation. Would it be that the public release of the military covering it's actions fo rthe sake of knowledge, or withholding that knowledge in favour of the safety of America troops abroad and the citizens in the United States.
I would choose to withold the information because, from a utilitarian standpoint, citizens' and troops' safety would have taken importance over anything else. It is important to understand that, in many cases the world is a complex place, with many diplomatic efforts needing to be made, and the government conceals information to protect the best interests of their citizens.

Show More
Related

  • New York Times Co. versus United States: The Security of Secrets

    1965 Words  | 4 Pages

    McCraw, David, and Stephen Gikow. “The End to a Unspoken Bargain? National Security and Leaks in a Post-Pentagon Papers World.” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 48.2 (2013): 473-509. Academic OneFile. Web. 5 Dec. 2013.

    Read More

  • Snowden's Revelations: ECPA & USA Freedom Acts

    1542 Words  | 4 Pages

    Edward Snowden’s National Security Agency(NSA) leaked affair brought attention to American Citizens causing many arguments. Some argue they trust their government and wouldn’t change a thing about being monitored while others argue that their privacy being invaded is unconstitutional, and as a society living in surveillance, Americans need to reform the ECPA Act, and tell Congress to pass The USA Freedom Act.

    Read More

  • The NSA, Privacy and the War or Terrorism

    1550 Words  | 4 Pages

    Edward Snowden is America’s most recent controversial figure. People can’t decide if he is their hero or traitor. Nevertheless, his leaks on the U.S. government surveillance program, PRISM, demand an explanation. Many American citizens have been enraged by the thought of the government tracing their telecommunication systems. According to factbrowser.com 54% of internet users would rather have more online privacy, even at the risk of security (Facts Tagged with Privacy). They say it is an infringement on their privacy rights of the constitution. However, some of them don’t mind; they believe it will help thwart the acts of terrorists. Both sides make a good point, but the inevitable future is one where the government is adapting as technology is changing. In order for us to continue living in the new digital decade, we must accept the government’s ability to surveil us.

    Read More

  • Examples Of Utilitarianism: Dropping The Bomb

    1287 Words  | 3 Pages

    Another way to interpret utilitarianism is to have the positives of the outcome outweigh the negatives. In that sense, it is the ends of the act that justify the means and not the intent of the act itself. When President Truman made the decision to drop nuclear warheads on Japan, he did so with the intention that he would be saving more lives in the long run than if the current style of warfighting were to continue. Therefore, supporters of President Truman’s decision to deploy the atomic bombs during the Second World War defend his utilitarian

    Read More

  • US Government Monitoring Its Citizens

    1413 Words  | 3 Pages

    In early June 2013, Edward Snowden, a 29-year-old former defense contractor who had access to NSA database while working for an intelligence consulting company, leaked classified documents reports that the National Security Agency (NSA) is recording phone calls of millions of Americans along with gathering private data and spying foreign Internet activity. The Washington Post later broke the news disclosed PRISM, a program can collect data on Internet users. The leaked documents publicly stated a vast objection. Many people were shocked by the scale of the programs, even elected representatives were unaware of the surveillance range. A nationwide debate over privacy rights have been sparked. Although supporters claim that the NSA only does its best to protect the United States from terrorists as well as respecting Americans' rights and privacy, many civil rights advocates feel that the government failed to be clear about the limit of the surveillance programs, threatening Americans' civil...

    Read More

  • Muckrakers of America

    674 Words  | 2 Pages

    It is not a surprise that journalists go to extreme lengths in order to get “dirt” on a certain subject. These journalists are often given the title of “muckraker.” The term holds many connotations; some believe that they are journalists who go a bit too far, while others believe that they are simply people whose main goal is to expose any sort of misconduct. Many people disagree on whether or not being given the title of a “muckraker” is honorable, and it causes a lot of arguments in the modern era. Because of this, it is important that everyone eventually ends up on the same side to prevent further disagreement.

    Read More

  • Edward Snowden: An American Hero

    676 Words  | 2 Pages

    Edward Snowden, the former National Security Agency (N.S.A) subcontractor turned whistle-blower is nothing short of a hero. His controversial decision to release information detailing the highly illegal ‘data mining’ practices of the N.S.A have caused shockwaves throughout the world and have raised important questions concerning how much the government actually monitors its people without their consent or knowledge. Comparable to Mark Felt in the Watergate scandals, Daniel Ellsberg with the Pentagon Papers, Edward Snowden joins the rank of infamous whistleblowers who gave up their jobs, livelihood, and forever will live under scrutiny of the public all in the service to the American people. Edward Snowden released information detailing the extent of the N.S.A breaches of American privacy and in doing so, became ostracized by the media and barred from freely reentering America, his home country.

    Read More

  • Cyber Security and Surveillance: Bulk Data and Metdata

    848 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of the factors at stake is the perception of the United States government to both the national and international community. The U.S. is typically seen as the “land of the free” but these leaks suggest otherwise and create distrust with the government. Also, the information collected is only as secure as the program designed; meaning, where will this data go and who is able to access it. The administration should consider addressing these issues quickly to prevent cyber security concerns, at the very least, from escalating.

    Read More

  • Journalist or Terrorist: Julian Assange

    747 Words  | 2 Pages

    Journalist or Terrorist Julian Assange, an Australian editor, activist, journalist and publisher, launched the WikiLeaks website in the year 2006. From that moment, the site spiraled rapidly into the limelight all over the world. It then came to be known as the most powerful whistle-blowing and also the most scandalous “media” in the online world. WikiLeaks profans and violates the right of privacy, right of accountability and confidentiality among Information and data sharing also it has a negative impact on governments, private sectors or businesses and also individuals, there is also a big question of accountability. Right of privacy, right of accountability and confidentiality are some of the rights that you acquire being a citizen of the country and when these rights are violated it is an offence.

    Read More

  • Privacy Security

    1393 Words  | 3 Pages

    The paper will deal with two aspects of the privacy-vs-security issue. The first one is concerned with general civil liberties, where privacy is understood to mean freedom to make personal (private) choices in our own homes, control our daily lives and decide with whom we share information that is of our concern – information about our emotions, attitudes, behavior and future decisions and events. The second aspect deals with the privacy vs. security on the internet. Since we live in a technological era, internet has become an inseparable part of our l...

    Read More

  • Indiviual Privacy vs National Security

    1175 Words  | 3 Pages

    James Madison once said “Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.” To gain a better understanding of a society, one must gain knowledge of the needs and wants the citizens’ demand from the country’s representatives. In every country the needed to protect its citizens is the same. In some nations, security is a higher priority which causes sacrifices to be made to obtain an indefinite protection against all rivals. In Peter Singer’s essay titled “Visible Man: Ethics in a World without Secrets” he states that there is a way that governments can collect information by using technology; to allow more ‘openness’ and exposure as an increase of unknown surveillance that the public is not aware of. Singer’s essay also talks about how also with the rise of secrecy within politics; organizations such as ‘WikiLeaks’ and ‘Anonymous’ reveal to the world what is really going on within their privacy. Benefits come from both sides in a world where surveillance exists to the highest priority with or without privacy.

    Read More

  • Ethics of Surveillance

    1069 Words  | 3 Pages

    The world erupted in outrage following revelations by Edward Snowden regarding the extent of surveillance perform by the National Security Agency. Privacy becomes one of the hottest topic of 2013 and was chosen by the world’s most popular online dictionary, Dictionary.com, as the Word of the Year. However, the government is not the only one that conduct data gathering and surveillance. Employers often monitor their employees, and businesses collect data on theirs customer. The morality of these practices is a topic that generates heated debate.

    Read More

  • Edward Snowden: Traitor or Whistleblower

    889 Words  | 2 Pages

    Edward Snowden. This is a name that will be in the history books for ages. He will be branded a traitor or a whistleblower depending on where you look. Many Americans feel that Edward Snowden is a traitor who sold the United States’ secrets aiming to harm the nation. Others believe that he was simply a citizen of the United States who exercised his right to expose the government for their unconstitutional actions. It is important to not only know the two sides to the argument of friend or foe, but to also know the facts as well. My goal in this paper is to present the facts without bias and to adequately portray the two sides of the argument.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Edward Snowden

    646 Words  | 2 Pages

    It is reasonable to argue that, governmental institutions or people with authority are subject to withhold a great deal of information from society. Many may argue that secrets are kept to ensure the safety of the nation. Thus, upholding the governmental duty of protecting the nation against possible threats. On the other hand, many believe that secrets may exist which violate our constitutional rights. Over the last year, Edward Snowden, has made headline news for leaking sensitive governmental information to the press. Edward Snowden is a 29-year-old high school drop-out, who was a tech specialist for the National Security Association. Snowden had discovered and later exposed the NSA for monitoring the nations e-mails, phone calls, and internet searches. As the allegations spread like wild fire, Edward Snowden sought asylum in Russia for one year. Snowden had a valid and justifiable reason to expose the NSA to the world because they were in violation of our fourth Amendment rights to unreasonable searches and seizures. The government called him a traitor, while others viewed him as a hero for exposing the government. Edward Snowden is a whistle blower because he felt that it is up to society to decide if governmental practices are just or unjust. Snowden does “express the highest respect for the law”, and he wanted to protect the right of privacy for American citizens.

    Read More

  • The Erosion Of Privacy

    1208 Words  | 3 Pages

    As Evgeny Morozov would contend the problem of privacy with regards to technology is not a new dilemma. Commenting on Paul Baran’s essay The Future Computer Utility, Morozov came to the conclusion “our contemporary privacy problem is not contemporary.” (Morozov 2013) Though we do have newer considerations because of social networking, piracy, identity theft, and transparency, we are not suffering from an unforeseen nor unfamiliar idea. Upon further analysis of the technology issues there are many ways technology is changing the fabric of society. From children not having the physical dexterity to play with wooden blocks (Ratcliffe 2014) to private information getting hacked. There are a number of concerns regarding privacy and technology.

    Read More

More about WikiLeaks: Moral agent or National Threat?

Open Document