The simplest online database that could possibly work is wiki. Wiki allows users to use freely for creating and editing. In addition, wikis among group communication can allow the organization of contributions for editing in the content itself. Therefore, in my essay I am going to write about the definition of wiki, who uses wikis?, the types of wiki, what are the downsides ? And what are the significant of it?
The word "wiki" which means "fast" in the Hawaiian language. It is a piece of server software used to create a website that can allow users to freely create and edit by multiple individuals from any web browser. Also, one famous wiki is ]9web-based collaborative encyclopedia called Wikipedia was launched in January 2001. Moreover, Wiki was side-project of Nupedia by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger. Wiki is the most popular on the public web in terms of page views. In addition, wiki is web application that allows multiple people to easily contribute to the same document and they can add, modify, or delete to that document. Moreover, it is server program that allows users to collaborate for forming the content of web site. Also, it can provide many different purposes both public and private such as, editing rights may permit changing, adding or removing content online easily, and knowledge management systems. Moreover, wikis include features such as access rights management and notifications. Also, wiki has management component that allow people to accept or reject changes. Wikis also make it easy to search or browse for information. Although, wikis can also include texts, images, sound recordings and films. Wikis can also be used to record information and serve for course information and knowledge. Therefore, A g...
... middle of paper ...
..., people can restore a page easily. Third, it requires internet connectivity to collaborate with others. Then the flexibility of a wiki's structure can mean that information becomes disorganized. Finally, Wiki's can be protected by using a password, but that doesn't mean someone can't hack or inter into it.
In conclusion, Wiki is a useful tool that allows people from around the world to collaborate on a single project. The platform can be hard to learn but once you have it can be used for Educational, Information and Publishing by anyone. In my mind, the characteristics of a wiki are, easy collaborative document editing and creating, ability to update content and ability to find content through searching and browsing. Beside, wiki has downside that anyone can edit web sites so, there is no privacy. It requires internet connectivity to collaborate with others.
Sean Kamperman the author of “The Wikipedia Game: Boring, Pointless, or Neither” believes that wikipedia can be helpful with educational learning purposes. Wikipedia is known for plagiarism and fake information. People make Wikipedia have a bad reputation in schools especially in english classes. Wikipedia can be a source of entertainment and self improvement for some people. Some people might just research stuff on Wikipedia to find interesting articles. In “Wikihunt” many Wikipedia users have “discovered” a game of their own, this involves creativity so it brings out the creative qualities of people. Wikipedia is a educational game and it's also free it's convenient for people. The game “Wikihunt” involves two people in separate computers
...ie, 31 (1) 27-49.Fallis, D. (2008). Toward an epistemology of Wikipedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(10), 1662–1674. doi:10.1002/asi.20870
...addition, it provides a massive amount of historical information about the topic in a reliable, non-biased fashion through real documents. Lastly, the good aspects of the website dramatically outweigh any bad aspects of the site. It is a reliable source of learning history because in today’s society, the most accessible way to learn history is through the Internet. There is no way to go back in time to witness history, so it’s imperative that historians utilize the good sources for learning history online, like the one analyzed today about the Salem Witch Trials.
He described in detail about the early days of Wikipedia, its challenges and finally overcoming those challenges. And he did not shy away to declare his delight over this unprecedented success of Wikipedia. “Wikipedia flourished while traditional, well-respected print publications, not least Encyclopedia Britannica, languished”, he
The best thing about Wikipedia is that it concisely provides topic wise systematic information on every topic for ‘short and quick reference’ of the summary on our search topic, a distinguishable and easy to note introduction. We also credit it for providing information in a very systematic and orderly manner and is quite too detailed in providing information and pictures on an article. Wikipedia is a good source for starting with basic information as it gives a summary in the beginning that almost gives the reader an approximate knowledge of what he is reading.
1.) Write 1-2 paragraphs comparing and contrasting your writing process before WAC 101 and after. _______/ (10 points)
For example, Wikipedia is normally surfing by users for any type of information but, information which is available on Wikipedia is not always accurate because any person can edit information on it and it doesn’t necessary that data is perfect.
...of rights and freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. “ (section 1 of the canadian charter of rights and freedom) wikileaks does not measure the risks of its publication and the effects they can cause people. legislation laws and regulation are created so that society is protected and to have a better sense of accountability. When everything is exposed to the public, chaos is bound to follow. Wikileaks jeopardizes and openly defies the right of privacy, right of accountability and confidentiality among descrete information and data and also causes inconvenience to governments, private sectors and even individuals in various walks of life. after all acts of hacking into something private is inappropriate, dangerous and illegal.
It lets things be edited or changed as time moves on and changes. Now we may have all used Wikipedia once in our life time. I have used it serval times as I found out how handy it comes when you have just a quick question or need a whole data base to find information. It is user friendly has all the things that you or a person needs and relatively easy to cite. Now we all have been
Wikipedia is an online resource platform that acts as the encyclopedia in all disciplines. The reliability of the information that is found from it has always been doubtful by professors when used in studies as the reliable reference point. The information that is retrieved from Wikipedia by the teachers and professors makes it to be difficult to become a reliable source, since there is no credit that is accorded to it. Wikipedia can be easily accessible in two senses, its content can be used freely as well as the free contribution given to individuals who are able to create content in the Wikipedia platform. Wikipedia authorities free development and spread of human knowledge in the sense, which is more general (Wikipedia, 2016).
The difference between wiki and the other online communities listed above is this source gives a better insight into the series. For instance, it provides the names of the cast with pictures to know who is who, clips from the shows,a description about the show. Additionally, reviews by other fans that are both positive and negative. Also, questions fans asks and other fans answer, to sum it up a connection between fans. Which the other sources did not offer.
Wikipedia’s main goal is assisting individuals with a general perception of any topic. The majority of Wikipedia's critics cite sourcing as its number one problem. Wikipedia is a starting point, it was never intended to be an ending point. Wikipedia is great for getting a general understanding of a topic before diving into the research
“Wikipedia has the potential to be the greatest effort in collaborative knowledge gathering the world has ever known… It is consistently ranked among the most visited websites in the world” (Poe 349). As Marshall Poe, a historian and professor at the University of Iowa states, Wikipedia is one of the many sources on the internet that provides a forum of knowledge to explore. However, a problem lies within using the internet to find information; Are we really discovering the truth or are we discovering deceitful ideas? The information on the web can come from a variety of sources, which proves quite unpredictable.
Wikipedia is not an Appropriate Resource for Students Online resources have become extremely remarkable for college students because they can easily have an access to these sources without having difficulty. However, some of these websites and resources cannot be appropriate, for academic studies require reliable resources in order to get reasonable and accurate data. One of these inappropriate websites is Wikipedia because people cannot trust information, essays, and articles that were written by unknown authors.
Collaborative Answers or also called as Question and Answer sites are sites which help in knowledge exchange between users. One of the earliest websites to start this kind of community was Answers.com. From 2005 to 2009, the google used to show definitions linked from this website. Many websites are focused on multiple topics and all kinds of interests (Quora, Answers.com, Yahoo Answers etc.) But there are some websites which are focused only on some sets of topics such as Chegg (for academic help and question/answers) and Fixya (for products and its consumer related question answers).