Why Was The Montgomery Bus Boycott Effective

1569 Words4 Pages

One of the most significant results of the Montgomery bus boycott was the emergence of Martin Luther King, a Baptist minister, as a leader of the civil rights movement. King was brought to the forefront of the movement by development of the alliance of the churches with the NAACP. Historians Alan Farmer and Vivienne Sanders give the church as one of the most influential organisations for blacks and whites alike. Whites, (mainly Christians) found it hard to persecute or ignore a black Christian organisation that was so committed and provided such an inspirational leader. According to historian Vivienne Sanders , the boycott was a result of meticulous planning by black organisations that had been developing for years. The NAACP was still effective in its strategy of working through the law courts and it demonstrated the power of the whole black community. King’s speech shortly after the boycott began emphasises how the black community were acting within the law’ and that they were only using the tools of justice. As a Christian man, King would have wanted the protest to remain as legal and peaceful as possible. The insistence of doing it through these means it encouraged white support due to the ‘discipline of the black community’ . Vivienne Sanders describes how whites could not believe that local blacks had Joanne De Pennington takes the view that the black community was willing to forego personal comforts and stand up when confronted with the utmost hatred in order to assert their rights. This is reiterated by David Patterson, Doug and Susan Willoughby who explain one instance where 70 year old Mother Pollard summed up the determination and religious fervor of the boycott with the words “My feet are tired but my soul is

Open Document