Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relevance of julius caesar to today's society
Julius Caesars impact on Ancient Rome
Relevance of julius caesar to today's society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Caesar impacted lives in a mostly good way.
You might believe that Caesar was not the greatest leader of all time you might be right, but that’s misleading the truth is that is that Caesar fought for his people to gain their trust.
You might ask who is this Julius Caesar, he was one of the rulers of Rome. He is one of reason that Rome has changed.
When Caesar died,he was stabbed 23 times by the senate and his best friend Marcus. All because they did not like the choice he had made. That's misguide because after Caesar died Rome's history changed from being horrible to being good. All because of Julius Caesar and how he impacted people's lives. This shows that Caesar did something good when he still was alive and how history changed from
…show more content…
(http://madefrom.com/history/antiquity/ways-julius-caesar-changed-rome-and-the-world/ )
You might say why did they go to war or how, so Caesar had a choice to either bow to the senate and be destroyed politically or he could start a civil war guess which one he chose WAR.
“Pompey had powerful resources against Caesar, but Caesar had a tough,loyal and experienced army(http://www.notablebiographies.com/Br-Ca/Caesar-Julius.html).”
So when Pompey when in Egypt, he was killed by young Pharaoh if you were wondering who Pharaoh is he is the king of Egypt. Even though Pompey was killed that did not get rid of the problems in Rome until Caesar had to take a stand.
So when Pompey was killed that is how Caesar gained more land/territory. Even though people died,they knew why. This is important because this shows that Caesar is willing to do anything for his people even going to war because that's how Caesar impacted lives.
“Caesar gave the poor a place to go because they didn't have anywhere to go, so he gave the poor a voice and they were offered a new
…show more content…
Even though some people did not like what he did that’s misguided because they still when were whatever Caesar said even if was not a good choice.
Fun Fact: You know the calendar we use it everyday do you want to know something crazy, Caesar is the person who created it. July if after his name, so when it’s July think of how glad you are here, and that you have a purpose somewhere in the
Caesar, who was seen as a great leader of Rome. This point of view has
Shortly before his death Caesar was given several warnings throughout ActsⅡand Ⅲ , however he still went to meet with the Senate due to the fact he thought he was needed. He had an alliance with his adopted sons and valued soldiers Octavius and Antony. The play is about the events that follow his death making him an important secondary character that also portrays a protagonist. Caesar faced many conflicts throughout his lifetime, some internal and some external. He fought a war against Pompey ,which lead to conspirators plotting his death, and he was troubled by the fact that his wife could not provide him with a child. He showcased this by publicly asking Antony to touch her as he passed her, hoping that this would bring healing to her barren womb. He also went through several character changes. When he returned from war, he returned believing that the people would be ecstatic to have him as an emperor. Nonetheless when the people of Rome did not respond the way he expected he knew he had to play on their emotions. He did this by refusing the crown three times and by offering to kill himself to prove his honesty and trustworthiness. This gave him the desired effect, so he returned to knowing that the crowd wanted him as a king. The driving force of the play was the unfortunate murder of Caesar or what happened afterwards. Throughout this play many of the characters go through many unique changes, although Julius Caesar experienced some very significant character changes. The theatrical work exhibits Julius Caesar’s actions, alliances, character developments, and internal and external conflicts which in turn showcase his various changes. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is a brilliant piece of work that thoroughly covers the story of Julius Caesar, a protagonistic secondary character. Julius Caesar was the unofficial emperor of Rome. He was a war General and he fought
Julius Caesar, an important figure in Roman history, lived during the end of the Roman Republic. His actions would shape the world around him forever. He was an important figure because he grew the Roman Empire, he brought about the end of the Roman Republic , and was able to grow his status within his lifetime and become dictator for life.
McManus, Barbara F. "Julius Caesar: Historical Background." Vroma. N.p., Mar. 2011. Web. 21 Feb. 2014.
Caesar for a some what of a good reason. Brutus killed him because he thought it would
Julius Caesar (100-44 BC) was one of the most outstanding leaders in history. He was the first ruler of the Romano-Hellenic civilization and achieved his goals with great success throughout his life of 56 years. He was assassinated by the conspirators, who accused him of practicing tyranny. This essay will discuss whether it was right for the conspirators to murder Caesar and what its consequences were. The conspirators were wrong to kill Julius Caesar because he contributed to the upturn and reformation of Rome into an orderly state.
Caesar created jobs for his people, and he fed the hungry and the poor. “The hungry hordes in the city were now given free bread. Caesar created jobs by building roads, temples, and aqueducts.” Caesar brought fresh water to the city through his aqueducts. “Fresh water flowed freely in fountains throughout the city. Sanitation, sewage, and food all were seemingly under the control of Caesar.” Caesar was a good leader, the assassins only killed him because they were selfish and wanted their power back, the only person who had more of a reason than that was Brutus. “Now, while the average Roman basked in Caesars rule, then Senate of Rome was furious.” Caesar was a dictator, but he was a good
https://www.ancient.eu/Julius_Caesar/ “As long as Caesar was a public servant he was safe from prosecution by his Optimate enemies for hislegal indiscretions but, once his consulship ended, he was sure to be indicted. Further, Caesar was deeplyin debt, both financially and politically, to Crassus, and needed to raise both money and his prestige.” Julius Caesar used his power as a public servant to not get prosecuted by his enemies. He was deep in debt and had to raise money and is prestige. He was always in trouble throughout his reign and used his power to not get prosecuted by his enemies which makes him a tragic hero. https://www.history.com/topics/ancient-history/julius-caesar “Caesar invaded Italy and drove Pompey into Macedonia in less than seventy
Julius Caesar was a great leader for Rome. He was able to obtain large amounts of food. All the food combined was enough to hand out to all the hungry hordes of people in Rome who were not fed when the senators where in charge. “The hungry hordes in the city were now given free bread.” This shows that Caesar cares for all the people in Rome. Instead of keeping all the food for himself he handed it out to the people that needed it more. If Caesar was a
McManus, Barbara F. "Julius Caesar: Historical Background." Vroma. N.p., Mar. 2011. Web. 21 Feb. 2014.
The secondary argumentation for Caesar's life is that he was skilled. I have witnessed first-hand the skill Caesar has in war, politics, writing and literature. He wrote the Commentaries on the Gallic Wars. If he could write an entire book, imagine what else he can do. Some citizens call him a “Military Genius”. He has to have done something right if he’s earned that title.
They believe that he was a tyrant because the senators had no power during his rule. In the story it says, “With Caesar they [the senators] were now as worthless as Brutus’ forgotten tooth. However, this opinion is incorrect because even when the Senate had an abundant amount of power, they were ineffective, “The Senate had ruled Rome poorly, caring more about their own political squabbles than the people.” Caesar was a hero who brought Rome back to life. Before Caesar was the ruler of Rome, the people were miserable because they were struck with poverty.
When he repeatedly made reforms that aided the poor or veterans, the senate became worried. The senate was mostly concerned with personal gain so when Caesar stepped in and changed the tide, the senate became worried. They saw him as a tyrant with too much power who needed to be stopped. The senate did not like a democratic person taking full control over Rome as they would have no power. The only solution to this was to assassinate Caesar. The opinion of the sentence was, “Achievement was worthy of praise and honor, but excessive achievement was pernicious and a threat to the state.” (Holland). As Caesar grew, he made more laws which aided more growth. This cycle of growth seemed more and more dangerous to the senate, as they feared someone with this level of power. With all of the influence of Rome in one man, many felt Caesar took on a dictatorial
	Shakespeare illustrated Caesar as a tragic hero by showing that he was a noble man of high rank. Every Roman followed his leadership and Caesar also defeated the great Pompey. First of all, At the Feast of Lupercal Caesar manipulated the commoners and made himself look noble to the commoners. Casca said, "Why there was a crown offered to him;...people fell a-shouting" (I,ii,221-223). Next, To show how noble and great Caesar was, the Romans would stand along the street sides to watch him pass by. "Madam not yet, I go to take my stand; /To see him pass on to the Capitol," said the soothsayer (II,iv,25-26). Finally, Caesar had the greatest rank possible as he would have been crowned king if it wasn’t for the conspiracy’s plot. As Casca said, "Indeed they say senators tomorrow; /Mean to establish Caesar as king..." (I,iii,87-88).
Caesar was already very powerful even without having the title king, and he has led his own army to many victories.