Why They Are Found In Strata

721 Words2 Pages

Strata, which have contained fossils in the past, are sharply defined layers that differentiate between sedimentary rocks. Although evolutionists struggle to explain why strata have such unusual characteristics, Brown’s idea of liquefaction describes why they are found in strata. The reason why fossils and strata do not form in large scale quantities today is also due to liquefaction. Liquefaction greatly sorted out all of the layers of sediments and rock, and this is why strata are organized. Without the Flood, which caused global liquefaction, strata would not be as common. Quicksand, earthquakes, and wave loading are all examples of liquefaction. They all vary in intensity and the amount of liquefaction that occurs. Quicksand is created by water flowing upwards through sand. A flimsy cover of water coats each grain of the quicksand, …show more content…

Another reason is the fact that sedimentary layers stretch for thousands of miles across the earth. Liquefaction explains why the layers are lengthy while current processes do not. The purity of some sedimentary layers is also explained by liquefaction. Current processes cannot sort out particles as fine as liquefaction. If uniformitarianism is correct, then erosion would have destroyed the sedimentary layers laid down in the past. The clearly distinguished separation of layers would not be found today. Only liquefaction accounts for this phenomena. A phenomena known as assorted fossils happened because of the Flood. Evolutionists claim that this happened because of macroevolution, which has an unknown cause. Macroevolution does not allow exceptions to happen, and if it were true, there would be no exceptions in the organization of fossils in strata. The various exceptions of fossils being found out of their “evolutionary order” proves that macroevolution is

Open Document