Why Should Students Be Flunked

404 Words1 Page

Flunking students in school is controversial because the purpose of attending school is contentious. The strongest counter-argument is it is expensive to flunk students, which is suggesting that the money spent on failed students could be used for other things. However, in my view, this point is wrong because although it is expensive, it allows students to learn life skills to earn higher paying jobs. Therefore, I maintain that students should be flunked.
To begin, students should be flunked because repeating grades allows them to learn the skills such as hard work, motivation, and determination that they may have missed the first time. Proving that students who just get through high school by cheating the system do not learn the skills, Sherry states, “High-school graduates and high-school dropouts pursuing graduate-equivalency certificates will learn the skills they should have learned in school.” …show more content…

In the opinionated article “Flunking 3rd-Graders Can Do More Harm Than Good,” David Callaway persuades school members that flunking students is a poor decision because of the impacts it has on the schools. Flunking students requires excessive costs. Inciting why flunking students is detrimental to the schools, Callaway states, “Forcing a student to repeat a grade costs an average of $10,000 per student per year.” If schools are having to sacrifice extra funds to hold back students, they are taking money that can be used to assist other struggling students. If the money is taken away from the struggling students, then the amount of students failing will increase. Then the amount of students that need to be flunked also grows which in the end, inclines the total amount of funds spent on students repeating grades and leaves little to no funds for other

Open Document