Why Is Hamlet Selfish

674 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The moral behind hamlet

The fact that he is not contented with the task he has to fulfill is the main reason for his inaction throughout the play, and although on several occasions has the opportunity to take his revenge, he always seems unable to act. So, despite the fact that Hamlet contemplates the idea of taking action, he finds reasons not to do so, always postponing “that it should come to this!” (1.2.136) Needless to say that the inconsistency between what Hamlet says and does evidences more his reluctance to take revenge upon his uncle. His hesitation, whether to kill Claudius or not, is justified as an undeserved favor that he would do him, by taking away his life.
“A villain kills my father, and, for that,
I, his sole son, do this same villain send
To Heaven.
Oh, this is hire and salary, not revenge.” (3.3.76-79) …show more content…

Scholars usually fault him for his failure to act, and as J.D. Wilson stated ”Shakespeare makes us feel that Hamlet is shirking a plain duty, and that he is blameworthy for his neglect” (224). His indecisiveness, as well as his inability to understand that the human mind cannot be controlled with utmost perfection for grounds such tragic end. Hamlet’s incapability to convince himself that what he is doing is the right thing is a clear example of it, as well as his motif for procrastinating over the matter: “My words fly up, my thoughts remain below/Words without thoughts never to heaven go” (3.3.98-99). So, Hamlet’s doubts and inner conflict keep him from proceeding with his task (“it is almost against my conscience” (5.2.294)), and although he says many things, the reality is that he is unable to take action and punish his

Show More
Related

  • Changes in Hamlet

    1202 Words  | 3 Pages

    People all around the world are familiar with the “To be or not to be” speech. Although some might not realize it is a speech by Hamlet, they do realize how powerful those lines are. Those lines show the mark of a great philosopher, and this is precisely what Hamlet is. Because Hamlet is such a fantastic philosopher at the start of the play, it leads him to what some believe is his downfall. The fact that perhaps he thinks too much on the people and incidents surrounding him is really what pulls him down. He spends an excessive amount of his day thinking about every aspect of every event.

    Read More

  • Changes I Would Make in Hamlet

    623 Words  | 2 Pages

    Before his aborted voyage to England, Hamlet spends the majority of the play (between the first scene of the second act and the fifth scene of the fourth act) deciding what to do about his dead father's command to avenge his "foul and most unnatural murder." Although Hamlet believes that revenge upon his uncle is the morally correct thing to do, and that revenge is required by familial loyalty, he still finds many excuses to delay. The most striking example of an excuse that Hamlet finds to avoid killing his uncle comes in act three, scene three, when Hamlet comes close to killing his uncle, but abstains from doing the deed because his uncle is praying.

    Read More

  • Hamlet Analysis

    1629 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the play Hamlet by William Shakespeare, Hamlet the king of Denmark is murdered by his brother, Claudius, and as a ghost tells his son, Hamlet the prince of Denmark, to avenge him by killing his brother. The price Hamlet does agree to his late father’s wishes, and undertakes the responsibility of killing his uncle, Claudius. However even after swearing to his late father, and former king that he would avenge him; Hamlet for the bulk of the play takes almost no action against Claudius. Prince Hamlet in nature is a man of thought throughout the entirety of the play; even while playing mad that is obvious, and although this does seem to keep him alive, it is that same trait that also keeps him from fulfilling his father’s wish for vengeance

    Read More

  • Shakespeare's Hamlet was an Overthinker and Complex Philosopher

    641 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hamlet's tragic flaw was that he either considered things too much, or he acted on impulse but out of passion and not reason, which leads to his downfall. Hamlet was an over thinker and a complex philosopher who wanted revenge on his father’s death. Things don’t go as planned as Hamlet’s two opposite flaws change things. One of Hamlet’s flaws, procrastination, is shown in the prayer scene when he has the opportunity to kill Claudius and get revenge on his father’s death, and he doesn’t take it. His second flaw completely opposite from the first, was acting on impulse out of passion making him kill the wrong man, Polonius. Hamlet’s acting out of passion and anger not only killed the wrong man but it was also Ophelia’s father, causing her to commit suicide. Hamlet was a hero trying to do the right thing, but his tragic flaws turn everything around when everyone including himself dies .

    Read More

  • Psychoanalytic Criticism Of Hamlet

    1072 Words  | 3 Pages

    In “Tragic Flaw in Shakespeare’s Hamlet”, P Indira Devi states “His (Hamlet) tragic flaw is ‘procrastination’... Hamlet is well aware of his fatal flaw. His continuous awareness and doubt delay him in performing the needed act.” (Devi 95). Others would like to believe it is because Hamlet is a thinker and not someone who usually takes action. In a study called “True Hamlet” Oana TATU says “He (Hamlet), the thinker, is required to take action; not any kind of action, but the action of avenging a dead king/father, an action that is objectively evil.” (TATU

    Read More

  • Indecision, Hesitation and Delay in Shakespeare's Hamlet - Needless Delay?

    684 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Hamlets mind, it is now his duty to avenge his father's murder. This is where the real problem of inaction enters the play. Later that night, Hamlet has a perfect opportunity to kill Claudius, when he sees the King kneeling in prayer. He wonders if this is the time to kill him and get it over with, but decides not to. He claims that he does not want Claudius to go to heaven, so he would rather kill him when he is committing a sin. If this is the case, then why doesn't he simply wait till Claudius has completed his prayer, accuse him of the murder and kill him in his sin of denial. Instead, Hamlet goes to the chamber of his mother and passes up his best opportunity at revenge. The argument can be made, however, that it is not a fear of killing that causes this inaction. He does not display an inability to end someone's life when killing Polonius. He neither hesitates nor capitulates in sending Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to their executions. Why then would the prince of Denmark hesitate to kill the one man he most justly could? Many literary believe that his inaction is the result of a vicarious Oedipus complex. Those who concur with this theory say that Hamlet, in his subconscious mind, has a desire to do exactly what his uncle has done; that is, get rid of the king so that he can have Gertrude for himself.

    Read More

  • Hamlet is Too Smart for Himself

    717 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hamlet only kills Claudius when he has also murdered the queen, Laertes, and has also poisoned himself. It takes a threat of death to do what his own dead father orders him to do. A largely held opinion is that he is to emotional to do it, but it is when his emotions all come together that he murders Polonius. Another opinion is that he to full of morals to kill, but how then can he alter a note and literally sentence two old friends who were just following orders too death. It is also believed that he is too cowardly to go through with it, but if a man is bold enough to face a ghost, confront a queen and kill an eavesdropper, than what should stop him from avenging his father and ridding Denmark of the disease that infests it's royal line. The answer is simple, he is to smart to get around to doing it.

    Read More

  • Why Is Hamlet Noble

    799 Words  | 2 Pages

    a) Hamlet is an exceptional man primarily because of his bravery, loyalty, and intelligence. For instance, when the ghost appeared to him, he showed his bravery when he went to follow it. Including that, he also shows bravery when he accepts his mission to get his “revenge” (1.5.31). To continue, Hamlet shows loyalty to Ophelia when she states to Polonius that he has shown her his love in an “honorable fashion” (1.3.111). Not only is he loyal to Ophelia, but he is also loyal to his friend Horatio.

    Read More

  • Social and Psychological Influences on Hamlet

    772 Words  | 2 Pages

    Once Hamlet has learned of his father’s death, he is faced with a difficult question: should he succumb to the social influence of avenging his father’s death?  The Ghost tells Hamlet to “revenge his foul and most unnatural murder” (1.5.31) upon which Hamlet swears to “remember” (1.5.118).  Hamlet’s immediate response to this command of avenging his father’s death is reluctance.  Hamlet displays his reluctance by deciding to test the validity of what the Ghost has told him by setting up a “play something like the murder of (his) father’s” (2.2.624) for Claudius.  Hamlet will then “observe his looks” (2.2.625) and “if he do blench” (2.2.626) Hamlet will know that he must avenge his father’s death.  In the course of Hamlet avenging his father’s death, he is very hesitant, “thinking too precisely on the event” (4.4.43).  “Now might I do it…and he goes to heaven…No” (3.3.77-79) and Hamlet decides to kill Claudius while “he is drunk asleep, or in his rage, or in th’ incestuous pleasure of his bed” (3.3.94-95).  As seen here, Hamlet’s contradicting thought that Claudius “goes to heaven” (3.3.79) influences him to change his plans for revenge.  Hamlet eventually realizes that he must avenge his father’s death and states “from this time forth my thoughts be bloody or be nothing worth” (4.4.69).  From this, Hamlet has succumbed to the social influence and has vowed to avenge his father’s death.

    Read More

  • Hamlet: Fate vs Free Will

    1003 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... His desire to obey his dead father’s request and exact revenge on Claudius warred against his qualms and doubts of killing another human being. When he finally accepted the role Fate plays in the lives of mankind, Hamlet could proceed to “accept the necessity of killing Claudius. [because] he would simply be acting as the instrument of divine justice at work in the world.” (Ahlman)

    Read More

  • Hamlet's Hesistation to Kill Claudius

    1500 Words  | 3 Pages

    It could be said that Hamlet is deliberately delaying his revenge for fear of actually committing it. However, religion was a focal part of people’s lives at the time the play was set and at the time it was written, one would be justified in claiming that Hamlet genuinely didn’t want to kill Claudius while he was praying to prevent him from going to heaven.

    Read More

  • Hamlet and the Oedipus Complex

    604 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hamlet is incapable of killing his uncle since it would be symbolic of him taking his own life. Claudius unavoidably has to be killed in revenge for the murder of Old Hamlet. Hamlet, however, feels his right to do so is prohibited because he himself is evil due to his incestuous thoughts. Therefore, Hamlet acknowledges that he cannot judge another man for being immoral. He is also aware that killing Claudius whilst Gertrude is still alive would not only deeply scar her emotions but it would also be an admittance of him suffering from the Oedipus complex.

    Read More

  • Hamlet's Fatal Flaw

    783 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hamlet's character lends itself to a possible motivation for his unwillingness to kill Claudius. He is a scholar, and a student of theology. It is a moral dilemma for Hamlet to kill without a just cause, or kill at all. He wants proof of the part his uncle and his mother played in his father's death. His royal birth leads him to consider his responsibilities to his country, which is Hamlet's internal conflict throughout the play.

    Read More

  • Free Hamlet Essays: Hamlet's Inability to Take Action

    593 Words  | 2 Pages

    With his thinking mind Hamlet does not become a typical vengeful character. Unlike most erratic behavior of individuals seeking revenge out of rage, Hamlet considers the consequences of his actions. What would the people think of their prince if he were to murder the king? What kind of effect would it have on his beloved mother? Hamlet considers questions of this type which in effect hasten his descision. After all, once his mother is dead and her feelings out of the picture , Hamlet is quick and aggressive in forcing poison into Claudius' mouth. Once Hamlet is certain that Claudius is the killer it is only after he himself is and and his empire falling that he can finally act.

    Read More

  • Inconsistency in The Character of Hamlet

    1079 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hamlet seems incapable of deliberate action, and is only hurried into extremities on the spur of the occasion, when he has no time to reflect, as in the scene where he kills Polonius, and again, where he alters the letters which Rosencraus and Guildenstern are taking with them to England, purporting his death. At other times, when he is most bound to act, he remains puzzled, undecided, and skeptical, until the occasion is lost, and he finds some pretence to relapse into indolence and thoughtfulness again. For this reason he refuses to kill the King when he is at his prayers, and by a refinement in malice, which is in truth only an excuse for his own want of resolution, defers his revenge to a more fatal opportunity, when he will be engaged in some act "that has no relish of salvation in it."

    Read More

More about Why Is Hamlet Selfish

Open Document