More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical aspects of electronic surveillance
Ethics of surveillance essays
Article on domestic terrorism impact in america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical aspects of electronic surveillance
David Bowden November 8, 2016 English 11: Mrs.Fowler Domestic Surveillance In America we take freedom and privacy for granted, we as people are unable to comprehend how safe our country actually is, especially in today's society. With that being said there is something that we must all understand, in this age of technology if people are not surveillanced it puts everybody else in our country and the country itself at risk. There are aspects of our privacy and life that we have to sacrifice in order to secure the freedom that we do have. The NSA and U.S. government needs access to our private information in order to ensure the safety of our country and citizens. The NSA and U.S. government sifting through our private information is but a small inconvenience that we must sacrifice in order to protect our own freedom and safety. Domestic Surveillance roots back to the 1910’s, where the assassination of President McKinley, created a Bureau of Investigation that would trace the efforts of the Communists attempting an uprising in America. This would be the foundings behind Domestic Surveillance in America, and would continue on after World War II where the government created the NSA and CIA, with the main purposes …show more content…
Terrorism is very real, it has just recently happened again at Ohio State University. “He urged America "to stop interfering with other countries, especially the Muslim Ummah," a term for Muslim people at large. "By Allah, we will not let you sleep unless you give peace to the Muslims," he wrote. "You will not celebrate or enjoy any holiday" (CNN. Cable News Network). People like this will remain a problem no matter what ulterior motive the Domestic Surveillance has, and the only way to stop it is to simply monitor the people so when we find a threat we can abolish it as fast as
How would you feel if everything you did on the internet, every text you sent, and every call you made was seen by someone? That is what the NSA is doing right now. According to Wikipedia, the National Security Agency is a national-level intelligence agency of the United States of Defense, under the authority of the Director of National Intelligence.[1] They have been a controversial topic since the 1970s when it was revealed that they had been wiretapping Americans’ telephones. Their surveillance has only grown since then, even though most Americans disagree with it. [2] The NSA’s domestic surveillance is unconstitutional, ineffective, and a violation of privacy that needs to be stopped.
Government seems to take away more privacy than they say they protect. In 1984 the citizens were constantly being monitored no matter where they were, there was no escape. "It was terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or within range of a telescreen. The smallest thing could give you away" (Orwell 62). Members of the party were constantly being monitored, at even the slight sign of disloyalty they would be apprehended by the Thought Police, striking fear into the people. People had no privacy due to the government and this can now be seen today. Referring to the NSA "The agency has circumvented or cracked much of the encryption, or digital scrambling, that guards global commerce and banking systems, protects sensitive data like trade secrets and medical records, and automatically secures the e-mails, Web searches, Internet chats and phone calls of Americans and others around the world"(Lopez np). Growing use of internet and technology makes it easier for the government to spy on us. Like in 1984 they will soon be able to track our every move. There is no way to completely remove ourselves from technology, there's are steps to take to protect privacy. A solution is to keep more records on paper instead of online. Also, what is posted on social networks should be limited. The less information you give them, the less the government knows.
Edward Snowden is America’s most recent controversial figure. People can’t decide if he is their hero or traitor. Nevertheless, his leaks on the U.S. government surveillance program, PRISM, demand an explanation. Many American citizens have been enraged by the thought of the government tracing their telecommunication systems. According to factbrowser.com 54% of internet users would rather have more online privacy, even at the risk of security (Facts Tagged with Privacy). They say it is an infringement on their privacy rights of the constitution. However, some of them don’t mind; they believe it will help thwart the acts of terrorists. Both sides make a good point, but the inevitable future is one where the government is adapting as technology is changing. In order for us to continue living in the new digital decade, we must accept the government’s ability to surveil us.
How much privacy do we as the American people truly have? American Privacy is not directly guaranteed in any manner under the United States Constitution; however, by the Fourth Amendment, Americans are protected from illegal search and seizure. So then isn’t it ironic that in today’s modern world, nothing we do that it is in any way connected to the internet is guaranteed to remain discreet? A Google search, an email, a text message, or even a phone call are all at risk of being intercepted, traced, geo located, documented, and stored freely by the government under the guise of “protecting” the American people. Quite simply, the Government in order to protect us and our rights, is willing to make a hypocrite of itself and act as though our right is simply a privilege, and without any form of consent from the people, keep virtual tabs on each and every one of us. In the words of Former Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis “The right to privacy is a person's right to be left alone by the government... the right most valued by civilized men." Privacy isn’t just Privilege, it is nonnegotiable right, and deserves to be treated as such.
Domestic Surveillance: Is domestic surveillance worth the hassle? In 2013, whistleblower Edward Snowden revealed to the American people that the National Security Agency had been spying on them. Not only that, but also on world leaders. Domestic surveillance is understood as the first line of defense against terrorism, but it has many downsides, not only it violates Americans lives, also it spies on our social media, it puts a fine line on their privacy, and it is a big stab at the freedom of speech. According to John W. Whitehead, “The fact that the government can now, at any time, access entire phone conversations, e-mail exchanges, and other communications from months or years past should frighten every American.”
The recent terrorists attacks of 9/11 has brought security to an all-time high, and more importantly brought the NSA to the limelight. Facts don 't change however, terrorist attacks are not common as history has shown. So what has domestic surveillance actually protected? There are no records to date that they have stopped any harm from being caused. If it is well known by every American that they are being watched, then why would a terrorist with the intention of harming use these devices to talk about their heinous acts? The real criminals are smarter than this, and it has shown with every attack in our history. Petty acts of crime are not what domestic surveillance should be used for. Terrorism has been happening for decades before any electronics were introduced, and even in third world countries where electronics are not accessible. The government needs a different way to locate these terrorists, rather than spy on every innocent human being. Andrew Bacevich states in his article The Cult of National Security: What Happened to Check and Balances? that until Americans set free the idea of national security, empowering presidents will continue to treat us improperly, causing a persistent risk to independence at home. Complete and total security will never happen as long as there is malicious intent in the mind of a criminal, and sacrificing freedoms for the false sense of safety should not be
Our Country was built on the idea of liberty, and the government is fully jeopardizing this liberty. One of the most important drawbacks of domestic surveillance is that is violates our human
“The Dangers of surveillance,” was written by Neil M. Richard. In this article, the author had made more than three warning to the general public regarding the government surveillance and the dangers that come with the surveillance. He wants to make sure that as the general public, we the people need to understand the purposes of the surveillance and how it can affect us on our daily life. His first warning was, “the government surveillance is harmful because it can chill the exercise of our civil liberties.” The second warning, “special harm that surveillance pose is it effect on the power dynamic between the watcher and the watched.” The third warning, “surveillance menaces our intellectual privacy and threaten the development of individual
The article “A Surveillance Society” By William E, Thompson States that surveillance is a major part of today’s society and most people throughout their day wouldn’t even notice if they were being watched. Cameras can be found on almost every street corner and in every gas station or convenient store. In The terrorist attacks of 9/11 played a major role in starting this technology trend, the United States government and Law enforcement started using cameras that they had set up to more or less spy on the US population. The US government then revised and expanded the Patriot Act in 2006, which in a nut shell meant, they were allowed to spy on anyone they wanted to through there daily routines. But it doesn’t stop there, large corporations and
There’s a reason why boys use incognito mode on web browsers – they don’t want people to know what they were doing. The NSA also doesn’t have a warrant or even a reason to gather information on Americans who are not suspected of certain crimes. It’s one thing if all of our files were put somewhere and nobody looked at them until a person had committed a crime or they’re keeping watch on a former criminal, but that’s not what’s happening. Somehow, however, “secret court orders allow (the) NSA to sweep up Americans’ phone records” (Franceshi-Bicchierai) and other things like our email or web history. Many Americans are appalled by this, especially since Edwards Snowden released this information, and are just surprised by how this gets around our fourth amendment in the Bill of Rights. People always say its for your own protection, but if it is that way than why aren’t we allowed to carry guns and protect ourselves like our ancestors did when this country started. Fearing who, what, and why the NSA is targeting seems a lot less stressful than knowing everybody in this country is after
Programs such as Prism are made to monitor everything a person may use to keep personal information. “The PowerPoint slide about Prism says it can collect “email, chat (video, voice), videos, photos, stored data VoIP [internet phone calls], file transfers, video conferencing, notifications of target activity - logins etc, online social networking details†and another category called “special requestsâ€,†(Arthur). Americans are skeptical of the government’s current methods of monitoring the internet. Citizens within the United States question the government they live under, many disagree with the government’s collection of information on private citizens. Some believe that the degree to which the government collects information is unnecessary. According to a writer for the New York Times, “In the wake of the exposure of two classified surveillance operations, most Americans expressed disapproval about the United States government’s collecting phone records of “ordinary†Americans,†(Gonchar). The people of the United States disagree with the government. In poles that have been taken, majority of Americans disapprove of the methods of information collection. There are and have been
Most people concerned about the privacy implications of government surveillance aren’t arguing for no[sic] surveillance and absolute privacy. They’d be fine giving up some privacy as long as appropriate controls, limitations, oversight and accountability mechanisms were in place. ”(“5 Myths about Privacy”). The fight for privacy rights is by no means a recent conflict.
In today’s society, the subject of government surveillance is one of the nation’s most controversial topic. Since Snowden’s leakage of confidential National Security Agency (NSA) information, the United States citizens have confirmation the government is “spying” on them through phone, internet, and public communications. Government officials have spoken to the people, saying it is for safety measures; to protect citizens from potential terrorism and catastrophes like the bombing attack of 9/11. However, I have come to believe that the surveillance at the magnitude the NSA is going to is not safe nor ethic.
Disclosures have shown that, until recently, the government regularly tracked the calls of hundreds of millions of Americans. Today, it continues to spy on a vast but unknown number of Americans’ international calls, text messages, web-browsing activities, and emails. It appears that the police now have a device that can read license plates and check if a car is unregistered, uninsured or stolen. Little did you know that the National Security Agency can go into your Facebook page and . And it not surprising that almost every store we go into now a day wants your home phone number and ZIP code as part of any transaction. If you’ve ever lost an iPhone, you may have used Apple’s “Find My iPhone” feature to remotely activate your phone’s GPS signal. I remember one time I was looking for a job on the internet for almost a week but couldn't find what I wanted. Then one random I started receiving random texts from this number trying if the right job for me which was sort of weird. But now I know about the NSA,which is spying on Americans, collecting data on phone calls we make, it's not as if we should have been surprised. We live in a world that George Orwell predicted in
In conclusion, the modern use of surveillance assists public safety, but not as much as they are an invasion of privacy. Americans should be aware of their civil liberties and protect them. There should not be a fine line between public safety and an invasion of privacy. NSA programs are illegal and overbroad. Do not let the U.S. constitution be un-followed. Remember wherever you are, “Big Brother is watching you.”