Why Is Atticus Wrong To Defend Tom

543 Words2 Pages

Imagine being a white lawyer in the 1930s who has to choose whether or not to defend a Black man who has been accused of raping a white woman. This is exactly what happens in Harper Lee’s novel, To Kill a Mockingbird. Atticus Finch is a white lawyer in the 1930s who chooses to defend Tom Robinson, an African American man, who has been accused of raping Mayella Ewell, a white woman. Some people believe Atticus was wrong to defend Tom because it put his life and his childrens’ lives at risk. However, Atticus was right to have defended Tom because he wouldn’t be able to face Jem and Scout if he hadn’t taken the case, and he cared about doing the right thing so he would have to live with regret if he didn’t attempt to defend Tom. Atticus wouldn’t be able to face Scout or Jem if he didn’t defend Tom …show more content…

In fact, Atticus even tells Scout why he took the case when she questions him about it, after Cecil Jacobs a classmate from school says Atticus is defending negroes and Atticus responds to Scout with “For a number of reasons, said Atticus. The main one is, if I didn’t I couldn’t hold up my head in town, I couldn’t represent this county in the legislature, I couldn't even tell you or Jem not to do something again (75-76)”. What Atticus is trying to say is that he would be a hypocrite if he didn’t defend Tom because he knows that blacks deserve a fair trial as much as whites do and if he didn’t stand up for them, he couldn’t tell his kids to do the same. Atticus would be ashamed of himself, at some point during the novel Atticus tells Scout that before he worries about other people, he must worry about his own conscience. Furthermore, Atticus attests the case to his religion when talking to Scout once more, saying “The one thing that doesn't abide by majority rule is a person's conscience (109-110).” Despite everyone

Open Document