Why Do Police Brutality?

686 Words2 Pages

After identifying a commonality among individuals, a group will form. The decision of the collective group to mobilize is now under analysis. There are two patterns of action in relation to police brutality cases and/or against racial inequality: protests and riots. Boulding would argue that “more is required than a straight political statement,” in order to get recognition. Public demonstrations are considered contentious tactic in a conflict. The reason these tactics are chosen is most likely to gain media and in turn national attention for this pressing matter. Peaceful protests have been practices for decades and often do not receive media attention. Riots, on the other hand, always capture national recognition. Two great examples are …show more content…

Of late, more public protests and riots regarding police brutality have emerged. I can speculate that the number of police brutality has most likely not increased, but the public awareness of this crime is on high alert. The “change of patterns of political opportunities and constraints and the use of strategic repertoire of collective action” are the reason for this sudden mobilization. As this social movement received national attention, the asymmetrical power between the states and social movement became more balances. Law makers are now being personally requested by their African American constituents to comply with greater consequences for police brutality. In addition, with national recognition, local states governments can no longer cover up or pay off the victims’ families; therefore, political constraints or the “repressive factors of the protest and the authorities’ capacity to present a solid front to insurgent and discourage contention” is failing. With this in mind, Michael Lipsky would say that with this opportunity and national attention, the recent police brutality cases provide a collective incentive to mobilize and challenge the

Open Document