Why Do Members Of Congress Need Term Limits?

1068 Words3 Pages

Our country’s founding Fathers never intended politics to become a lifetime career for any individual. Everyday citizens, who knew first hand our problems, would serve Congress for certain amount of time. When their time was up, they would return to their communities and live under the laws they agreed upon. Today, the term Career Politician is used to describe what happens in Congress. There are no boundaries that say a member of Congress can only serve a certain amount of terms. Congress members stay in office for years because of the pay increases, health benefits, and the overwhelming power. Today’s Generation believes that Members of the House should be limited to three two year terms and Senators limited to two six year terms. Term limits are rules restricting the number of terms an elected official can serve in a given office. In the United States, our President is the only elected federal official who has a limit placed on his term. Members of Congress do not operate under term limits and can run for reelection as many times as they like. It is not clearly understood that term limits is an old concept. This dates back at least to 1851, when the Indiana state constitution demanded them for every elected county office. Benjamin Franklin summed up the guidelines for term limits over two centuries ago as, “In free …show more content…

Do we need a reminder that long-term politicians with lots of experience in Washington have divine Americans with trillions in debt and a federal government that absorbs more and more from our wallets year after year? It says a lot that virtually every group that supports more government power and wealth redistribution opposes term limits. When they buy a lawmaker, they want him to stay bought and stick around a while. Term limits are reality checks. Term limits minimize Members' incentives for reelection related pork-barrel legislation. Term limits would restore respect for

Open Document