Who Was Responsible For The Deaths Of Romeo And Juliet Essay

1169 Words3 Pages

The story of Romeo and Juliet was simply about two lovebirds going through complications and problems that prevented them from being together. The forcefulness of their love ended with the tragedies of their life. At many parts of the play, we can identify moments where harsh and reckless decisions were made by both Romeo and Juliet. Such as, rushing into marriage, hiding the secret from everyone, and drinking the poison. However, there were pieces of evidence that provided to show that there were many other contributing factors that led up to their deaths. The deaths of Romeo and Juliet can be argued that it was caused by their action of rushing into love. Nonetheless, it would be inaccurate to dismiss the fact that there were other characters …show more content…

The servants from both families were mocking each other which started an unnecessary fight and ended up with the involvement of the Prince. This shows that their hate for each other is notoriously well-known that even their servants are involved in it. Their hatred also caused unnecessary deaths of Mercutio and Tybalt. In Act III scene 1, Mercutio’s last lines were, “A plague o' both your houses!” relaying that the cause of both families hatred had caused his death to be redundant. If the families would have been on good terms, Mercutio and Tybalt would not have died and Romeo and Juliet would have gotten married happily and not turned to suicide as their last resort. Their hatred for each other was also a disruption to the people. Their fights were often held outsides causing trouble and disturbance for other people. Despite the fact that it was never clearly stated on how their feud had started in the beginning, their hate for each other spiraled out of control which led to the deaths of their very own children. If the Capulets and the Montague looked past their differences and patched up their hate for each other, the likelihood of Romeo and Juliet’s death would be very …show more content…

Even though the Friar had good intentions for Romeo and Juliet, regardless, his plans sent them directly into their graves. Friar Laurence was supposed to be the adult figure in their life that made wise decisions, instead, he was naive and a fool. This can be traced back when the Friar supported Romeo and Juliet’s decision in getting married. Preferably, the Friar should have informed their families and the situation may have turned its routes. Further on in Act IV, scene 1, Friar Laurence suggests an idea of his; for Juliet to drink a potion that would leave her in a dead-like state, tricking her family and Romeo would be informed of his plan and save her so that they could eventually be together. First of all, the Friar’s was too naive to think that the plan would have gone horribly wrong and cause their deaths. He did not think of all the possible ways that the plan would have botched. The Friar was a good friend of Romeo and was helpful towards him in anyway he could be. Though he aided in hiding Romeo in Act III, scene 3, at that point of time, Romeo was convicted of murder and was sentenced to exaltation. In act V, scene 3, the Friar tries to cover up his mistakes by telling Juliet to become a nun and to move on before the people entering the tomb catches their act. The Friar says, “Come, I'll dispose of thee. Among a sisterhood of holy nuns: Stay not to question, for the watch is

Open Document