Who Is Upton Sinclair's Hidden Jungle: Target For Criticism

1158 Words3 Pages

“The Hidden Jungle”: It’s Hard to Find

What if a book that lacked literary expertise according to critics still managed to change a whole system of industry? A book that literary critics would call sub-par but would could cause an uproar solely by revealing the unsanitary conditions of a workplace. Such is the case with Upton Sinclair’s 1906 book The Jungle. Often not considered one of the legends of writing, Sinclair published over ninety literary works that received little attention and readership. Among his works, only a few stood out. He received the Pulitzer Prize for fiction in 1943 for his work Dragon’s Teeth. But he is most known for his controversial novel, The Jungle. Sinclair was a target for criticism largely due to his …show more content…

From the unsanitary working conditions to the mistreatment of workers and animals, he wrote about gruesome and upsetting topics that even caught the attention of the government. Because of Sinclair’s novel, the Food and Drug Administration(1906), the Federal Meat Inspection Act(1906), and the Pure Food and Drug Act(1906) were created. However, despite the good it has done for the safety of the people regarding consumption, the book is banned from many schools and libraries for the “violence” it contains. Because of this, many people do not have the chance to read a book that expresses ideas in which arguments that could enrich the reader’s mind that would allow the reader to become a more mature thinker. Although it is possible that the banning of the book was done out of consideration for the people, the right to decide whether to apply a book’s ideals and to be influenced by them should be solely up to the person after that person has decided whether or not the content is offensive or …show more content…

Not only that, many other publishing companies only agreed to publish the book if many excerpts of the book containing “violent” language and images were cut out. By cutting out important details that aid to the reality of the problem, the reader is left with a meek view of a horrific issue. In Areopagitica, John Milton states directly his viewpoint on censorship when he says, “the knowledge of and survey of vice is in the world so necessary to the constituting of human virtue, and the scanning of error to the confirmation of truth, how can we more safely, and with less danger, scout into the regions of sin and falsity than by reading all manner of tractates and hearing all manner of reason? And this is the benefit which may be had of books promiscuously read”. Milton’s argument is of utmost importance in that he shows how readers are entitled to their own opinion and how publishers do not have the right to cut out parts solely because they think the book is not suited for an audience. Just as in the First Amendment, Milton argues for freedom of speech and suggests that freedom in a literary sense is to be able to choose. To choose which books are helpful or useless. And to choose if the book should influence their thoughts or not. However, this freedom should only be

Open Document