Who Is The Protagonist In The Rocking-Horse Winner

685 Words2 Pages

The Rocking-horse Winner In D. H. Lawrence’s “The Rocking-horse Winner,” Paul, a kind-hearted young boy with strange blue eyes, is betrayed by two people who should have loved and protected him. Paul’s uncle, Oscar Cresswell is portrayed as a very wealthy man, who takes advantage of his nephew’s ability and makes money for himself. Paul’s mother, Hester is described as someone who is not happy with what she was. She does not love Paul enough. The two characters, Oscar Cresswell and Hester, both betray Paul for their own good. In the story, Oscar Cresswell uses his nephew’s ability in which he can predict what horse is going to win the next big horse race and earn money for himself. He is described as selfish human being who values …show more content…

In the end of the story, Paul only wants his mother's affection, so he rides his rocking-horse intensely in order to find out what horse is going to win the last big race of the season. After all, Paul finds out that the horse that he chose to win won, and thinks he satisfies his mother although he dies in the arms of his mother. Most importantly, Hester doesn't appear to feel remorse over the death of her son, but rather over the loss of her future income. However, Oscar ends with a frightening line, “My God, Hester, you’re eighty-odd thousand to the good and a poor devil of a son to the bad. But, poor devil, poor devil, he’s best gone out of a life where he rides his rocking-horse to find a winner” (Lawrence 90). He says to Hester that she earned a lot of money, then as an afterthought comments the unfortunate death of Paul. According to the article, “A Rocking-Horse: The Symbol, the Pattern, the Way to Live “ by William De Witt Snodgrass, “the life of the family that chooses money instead of some more stable value that takes money as its nexus of affection” (Snodgrass 191). William De Witt Snodgrass mentions the importance of money and how this impacts the lives of the family. The moral of the story is that money and materialistic things cannot substitute for

Open Document