Who Is Ichabod Not Responsible For As Much Evil

1281 Words3 Pages

Though “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow” by Washington Irving seems to have the story line of a classic american story, the story is truly representing a dark and somber state. The story is the tale of Ichabod Crane’s encounter with the headless horseman. Moving into a Dutch settlement, Ichabod Crane in infatuated with the folk tales of the town, he falls in love with a wealthy farm owners daughter, Katrina Von Tussel, then meets his match with the allusive Headless horseman. In “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow” by Washington Irving, some may argue that Ichabod is not responsible for as much evil as people give him credit for. It is true that the short story conveys that he represents the american author at that time period, however, above all, Ichabod …show more content…

By using characterization, Irving can describe Ichabod scaring himself with his own footsteps, “How often did he shrink with curdling awe at the sound of his own steps”.(Irving 5) With the narrator further emphasizing on Ichabod’s superstitions and own frightfulness when taking a simple walk, shows how Ichabod is both scared of himself and distasteful towards his simple surroundings. This provides a direct example to show how Ichabod is aware not only of his own evils, but Sleepy Hollows evils as well. By knowing exactly what Ichabod is thinking at this point in the story, it further provides evidence that Ichabod is responsible for the evil he causes. Albert von Frank believes that Ichabod has done nothing wrong as seen in his criticism, “ That Ichabod is evil needs all the more to be said since several modern readings of the story have made impressive moral claims on his behalf, or, alternatively, have transformed him into a pathetic hero, a figure more sinned against than sinning.” (Frank 1) This criticism is the direct opposite to the short story and against the altercation of Ichabod’s character throughout the story, because throughout the story, Ichabod is shown to be somber and detached. By going against the whole story just shows how Ichabod’s …show more content…

When Irving is characterizing Ichabod, a sense of terror and gloom are portrayed, “One might have mistaken him for the genius of famine descending upon the earth, or some scarecrow eloped from a cornfield.” ( Irving 3). By conveying Ichabod as a person so threatening that he is alluded to “the genius of famine”, it creates an eerie tone that adds an aspect of dark and disillusion to Ichabod’s character throughout the story, creating a mystifying persona to his character. (Irving 3) By the narrator doing this, Ichabod obviously threatens Sleepy Hollow. Irving furthers this idea when describing the living parts of the nature in Sleepy Hollow, “The moan of the whip-poor-will from the hillside, the boding cry of the tree toad, that harbinger of storm, the dreary hooting of the screech owl, or the sudden rustling in the thicket of birds frightened from their roost.” (Irving 6) When the narrator is describing Ichabod’s surroundings when he is walking, the setting adds an aspect of gloom and sober to Sleepy Hollow. This helps further the thought that Ichabod threatens the nature and setting of this Dutch settlement, through his evil nature and somber character.Albert Von Frank furthers this idea by showing how Ichabod changes the course of the story, “ In a way that decisively alters its original comic application, just as the imagine

Open Document