Who Are Most Responsible For The Tragedy Of Romeo And Juliet Essay

763 Words2 Pages

Many people know the story of Romeo and Juliet. They know the tragedy of it, and the obscene love story. However, many people may have overlooked the people who have influenced, or are responsible, for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet, indirect or not. The three characters who are most responsible for the tragic ending of the play are Friar Lawrence, Lord Capulet, and Tybalt.
Romeo and Juliet, by William Shakespeare, can be categorized as a tragedy, or a love story. It is about a boy, named Romeo, who falls in love with Juliet. However, both of their families are feuding, and this causes trouble with their relationship. Juliet’s father, Lord Capulet, forces her to be married to Count Paris, a wealthy man who is older than her. Juliet refuses, …show more content…

Firstly, he gave Juliet the vial of which contained sleep medicine so she could miss her wedding with Paris. However, at the end of the play, Romeo believes Juliet has died, and kills himself over it. When Juliet wakes up, she sees her love’s dead body over her, and decides to kill herself as well. From Act 4, Scene 1: “[Friar Lawrence]: When you’re in bed, take this vial, mix its contents with liquor, and drink” Furthermore, Friar Lawrence is the one that broke the news to Romeo that he has been banished from Verona. Even though this is completely indirect, Romeo seeks Juliet more, which only leads to the inevitable ending of the play. Overall, Friar Lawrence cleary contributed to the deaths of both Romeo and Juliet, directly, and indirectly. His actions influenced both of them to lead to their …show more content…

If he would have not had such a hot-headed temper, Tybalt, as well as Romeo and Juliet, would be alive. First of all, Tybalt was eager to call Romeo a villain, even though Romeo simply didn’t do anything wrong. In Act 3, Scene 1: “[Romeo]: I’ve never done you harm. I love you more than understanding.” Tybalt then stabs Mercutio in a duel, and kills him. Romeo fights Tybalt and kills him for justice, and then he is banished from Verona. This is cause and effect. If Tybalt never killed Mercutio, Romeo’s best friend, then he wouldn’t have been banished, and his love for Juliet wouldn’t have been strengthened. Ergo, Tybalt’s violence was a factor. In Act 3, Scene 1: “[Prince]: Romeo is herby exiled from Verona [for the killing of Tybalt].” Tybalt, clearly, contributed as equally as the other characters did. If Romeo was never exiled, and Tybalt never killed Mercutio, Romeo and Juliet alike would’ve never killed

Open Document