What Role Did Josephus Play In Judeo-Christian History

1303 Words3 Pages

After Reading and doing some reached I learn that the writings of Flavius Josephus have become a primary source of Judeo-Christian history. According to The Life of Flavius Josephus, Josephus “was born to Matthias in the first year of the reign of Caius Caesar”, being AD 37. At “fourteen years of age, he was commended by all for the love he had to learning; on which account the high priests and principal men of the city came then frequently to him together, to know his opinion about the accurate understanding of points of the law”. He was a Romano-Jewish historian and his surviving manuscripts of the writings of the first-century include references to Jesus and the origins of Christianity and the details that indicate what knowledge he had …show more content…

The early church, Schreckenberg writes, saw Josephus as "a kind of fifth gospel" and a "little Bible" because his works "appeared to Christian theologians to be a commentary or a historic appendix to the New Testament." The church's love for Josephus "assured him an ongoing role in Western tradition. political and religious establishment, just happen to be the founding figures of what scholar’s call “the Jesus movement.” And yet, properly understood in its historical contexts, this Messianic movement is broader than Jesus, beginning with John the Baptist, and advancing significantly under the leadership of Jesus’ successor. How could Josephus claim that Jesus had been the answer to his messianic hopes yet remain an orthodox Jew? But yet He did not believe him to be messiah, but he did document his existence, so claiming Jesus never existed would be to ignore proven fact. Josephus didn’t add more information to his written because he significantly believe Jesus was not the Christ. If Josephus really thought Jesus had been 'the Christ' surely, he would have added more about him than one paragraph, a casual aside in someone else's (Pilate's) …show more content…

He also reports in great detail the antics of other self-proclaimed messiahs, including Judas of Galilee, Theudas the Magician, and the unnamed 'Egyptian Jew' messiah. It is striking that though Josephus confirms everything the Christians could wish for, he adds nothing that is not in the gospel narratives, nothing that would have been unknown by Christians already, Josephus confirms every salient aspect of the Christ-myth: 1. Jesus's existence 2. his 'more than human' status 3. his miracle working 4. his teaching 5. his ministry among the Jews and the Gentiles 6. his Messiahship 7. his condemnation by the Jewish priests 8. his sentence by Pilate 9. his death on the cross 10. the devotion of his followers 11. his resurrection on the 3rd day 12. his post-death appearance 13. his fulfillment of divine prophecy 14. the successful continuance of the Christians. By jus written less about Jesus Josephus refuse to give Jesus a top billing. One might ask in reply why Josephus could not also have given Jesus top billing, simply on the basis of Jesus being the more familiar of the two names. Furthermore, note who else Josephus refers to - not just James, but also "others". If the references were reversed, the result would be a bit clumsy: "As therefore Animus was of such a disposition, he thought he had now a good opportunity, as Festus was now dead, and Albinus was still on the road; so he assembled a

Open Document