What Role Did Cotton Play In The Industrial Revolution

LeCouteur and Burreson, encounter to focus on gran marker events and use that aspect as a foundation, within justifying certain molecules that have shaped that specific era, with an overall sensation of exaggeration to some sense. In accordance, to the chemist authors, they claim that the principal factor of the Industrial Revolution was cotton. They failed to witness all the other major factors such as metallurgy and the steam power. They go off stating that, “Cotton was the start of the Industrial Revolution, transforming the face of England through rural depopulation, urbanization, rapid industrialization”.2 It is highly known, that England’s textile mills, effectively produce cotton, while reaching the purpose of transiting it to printed

The steam had forced a piston to shift the wheel and within this movement would be used in industries, including the textile industry. Furthermore, the steam engine had contributed to the initiation of industrialization, as well, because it was a locomotive that would be transporting goods, at the expense of low costs. According to LeCouteur and Burreson, they encounter another sense of exaggeration throughout assurance that, “it was sugar that fueled the slave trade, bringing millions of black Africans to the New World”.3 It is highly noted that sugar was one of the factors that expanded the slave trade; but what about the Columbian Exchange or coffee? If it wasn’t for the Columbian Exchange, the slave trade wouldn’t have extended as much as it did. Among the diseases (smallpox and malaria) the Europeans had implemented on the indentured servants, without having had memory cells to become immune, millions had fallen into the fatality of their fates. Therefore, with the Europeans wanting to continue sugar AND coffee plantations, they had to build an agreement with Africa, in order to export African

In reference to both the chemist novelists, they have accurately identified several compounds that have found their way in history, but failed to mention the relationship between themselves and the changes each compound created. For example, LeCouteur and Burreson do state, “The Bronze Age, when bronze was used for weapons and tools was followed by the Iron Age, characterized by smelting of iron and the use of iron implements.”4 These chemists do note of their existence, (of bronze and iron), but failed to go into an in-depth analysis as to how each of them incorporative their usage to today’s time. Bronze for example, had shown a transition from burins tools for hunting to a durable ax and adz heads for agriculture. This ultimate transition had set the stage for a new era, filled with new findings and affects for further implications, like other metallic elements. Elements, like tin, in which LeCouteur and Burreson, state was material that the buttons from Napoleon’s army coats where made out of. This material wasn’t able to support the freezing conditions of Russia, which is believe to led have fallen apart. Nevertheless, the predicament came to be if, “the lack of buttons meant that hands were used to hold garments together rather than carry weapons?”5 Within missing chemical structures like bronze