What Is The Theme Of Racial Passing And Miscegenation In Iola Leroyson

1020 Words3 Pages

Frances E. W. Harper extensively examines the related issues of racial 'passing' and miscegenation in Iola Leroy, a novel published in 1892 which features an African-American, female protagonist whose unusually "blue... eyes" and "white... complexion" permit her to transcend racialized divisions (17). Most prominently, Iola's perceived whiteness translates to her potential marriageability to the white men she encounters, a union which would effectually initiate Iola into white society. This conflict—and indeed, Iola's rejection of white Dr. Gresham's marriage proposal—is expounded in Chapter 27 of Harper's book, "Diverging Paths." Chapter 26, "Open Questions," presents a philosophical discourse about miscegenation that is complimented and directly …show more content…

Although the discrepancy in time period between the novel and selected archival documents is substantial—approximately seventy years, in fact, as the three historical materials roughly date back to 1960s—public opinion regarding these controversial topics altered negligibly during this lengthy interval, an unfortunate reality that demonstrates the slow progression of civil rights history. Even into the contemporary moment, interracial relationships in particular remain a contentious subject in various conservative pockets of the nation. This time-related concession addressed, the first historical article that I wish to collate with Harper's novel is a photograph entitled Edgar and Randy Williamson; 1964. The ostensible whiteness of the young boys depicted is challenged by the image's accompanying caption: "The boys were deemed 1/16 or 1/32 black and were therefore barred from their local white and black schools" (citation). The curator's meticulous selection of the word "deemed" is significant here, because such a usage connotes the very arbitrary nature of such a racial designation; this ambiguity is further revealed by the imprecise ruling that the boys may be either "1/16 or 1/32 black." Such imprecision begs the question: how can an individual be …show more content…

Aside from instances of cross-racial sexual assault or coercion—and indeed, Dr. Latimer laments the frequency with which master-slave rapes occurred—these examples of consensual, interracial relationships were marked by the stigmatic label 'miscegenation' (citation). Had Harper's heroine Iola accepted Dr. Gresham's marriage proposal, their union would be in outright defiance of the nineteenth century's anti-miscegenation laws. Although her racial ambiguity could conceivably prevent local authorities from recognizing the illegality of their marriage and from pursuing criminal charges, Iola admits her anxiety that they would still face "social ostracism" despite her light complexion: "Doctor, were I your wife, are there not people would caress me as a white woman who would shrink from me in scorn if they knew I had one drop of negro blood in my veins?" (citation). These complex social attitudes toward miscegenation are elucidated in two pamphlets from the archive: D. B. Red's "Race Mixing a Religious Fraud" and Dr. Bela Hubbard's "The Hybrid Race Doctrine: A Critical Analysis of Some Teachings of Modern Anthropology." The disparate institutions whose ideologies these pamphlets represent—the former defends segregation in the Christian church whereas the

Open Document