What Is Kavod

582 Words2 Pages

1. Explain what makes the following phrases difficult to interpret:
שוליו מלאים את ההיכל .a
This phrase is difficult to interpret because “lower extremity” could be referring to any lower extremity. It is not specified what extremity is the lower one and what the extremity is from. It is not explicit what that part of the phrase is referring to. שוליו could be referring to either the garment or the throne(it) or God’s foot (his). קדוש קדוש קדוש .b
This phrase is stating “Holy, Holy, Holy”. It is difficult to interpret because the significance of the repetition is unknown. Also, holy is difficult to understand as holy usually is defined as “dedicated or consecrated to God or a religious purpose”. However, God cannot be dedicated to God. Obviously, …show more content…

However, we do know that kavod usually is in the context of God’s greatness. Another difficulty is that when kavod is used it usually in context with a prophet or the Jewish people; it never refers to the whole world. We do not know the implications of kavod when it is referring to the whole world.
שמעו שמוע ואל תבינו .d
This statement is difficult to understand because of the grammar. We do not know what form the verbs are in. Also, if it is interpreted as commands, Isaiah is a prophet of falsehood. God is essentially telling Isaiah to tell the Jewish people to ignore everything and continue to sin. This is difficult because we do not want God to be unaccepting of repentance and one who spreads falsehoods.
2. Take any two of the above and give two interpretations that explain away the difficulty.
שוליו מלאים את …show more content…

The three interpretations are that the “lower extremity” is either God’s foot, the throne’s skirts, or God’s robe. Rashi interprets it as God’s foot because heaven is God’s throne and the earth is God’s footstool (Isaiah, Chapter 66). Because this vision is on earth, God’s foot fills the room. ICC interprets it as the throne’s skirts. The support for this interpretation is grammar. Instead of the word “שוליו” referring to God as the subject, it refers to the throne as the subject. JPS interprets it as God’s robe. God is hidden/covered by a robe of light, an aura. This interpretation makes sense because God does not want to be seen. Therefore, all of these interpretations have its own support and reasoning.
שמעו שמוע ואל תבינו
Rashi interprets the phrase with verbs of continuous action. Rather than Isaiah being ordered to keep the Jewish people from repenting, this phrase is the explanation of why they were destroyed.

3. What is the relationship between the prophecy of Amos and Isaiah? How does it help explain the meaning of שמעו שמוע ואל תבינו ?
While Isaiah’s commission could be interpreted as an explanation for the destruction of Israel, others interpret the verbs as commands. In the past prophet Amos recalled the destruction the same way, that God does not want to have the Jews repent, that He will not accept repentance. God does not want to forgive Israel. Isaiah is simply repeating, in a way, what Amos

Open Document