What Is Gaius Caligula Evil

1043 Words3 Pages

Gaius Caligula was welcomed happily as emperor after Tiberius's death. Just like most Roman Emperor, Caligula was not very sympathetic He was not interested in the murder of his relatives nor was he concerned about his own sickness. Someone had promised to fight in the arena when Caligula had healed from his illness. As a result, he forced the man to fulfill his oath and would not allow him to leave until he won the match. Someone had also promised to commit suicide and when Caligula found out he was still alive he had the man flung over the rampart. Suetonius believed that there was something wrong with Caligula mentally that caused him to not be an effective emperor. As a child, he suffered from epilepsy so Caligula was well aware of both his mental and physical sickness. …show more content…

He forced parents to attend their sons executions and then would invite them over to dinner after. Setuonius argued that Caligula’s savage crimes matched his brutal language. He was not compassionate towards anyone and was comfortable doing whatever he wanted to anyone. His motto was “let them hate me, so long as they fear me.” When someone was executed, he wanted it to be a slow, painful death. He preferred that small wounds be inflicted so that they could feel that they were dying. He often watched the trails of torture while he was eating or enjoying himself, which suggests that Caligula was a sociopath. Whenever he kissed the neck of his wife or mistress, he would mentioning cutting her throat. Although Setunious has only mentioned the negative things about Caligula, there are some positive things about Caligula as well. Caligula was extremely talented and practiced multiple arts. He made appearances as a Thracian gladiator & charioteer, singer, and dancer. He often supported tragic actors at public performances. Despite his cruel behavior and arrogant attitude, Caligula was extremely

Open Document