Ethical Egoism Essay

727 Words2 Pages

Ethical egoism is a theory which is normative. The theory is based on favors, praises and motivation. The main factors considered in this theory are the actions of person that result to impact individually. People are believed to act according to their interest. The argument is that, we are bound up due to our own happiness, interests, desires and hopes. There is essence of behaving to our will, and center to things that make difference in our lives. This egoist approach says that good action is which fits for an individual, for example if one is hungry and there isn’t food and decides to eat chips, then that is good according to him and he deserves to do it. Applying this theory to the case of Delshondra who is sick we will consider what …show more content…

Morality defines what is right or wrong and still good and bad actions. The theorists of the natural law believe laws related to man are defined by morality (Moore, 277). They believe the laws can’t be defined by the government or kings who are authoritative figures. Humans are guided by these natural laws to figure out the laws and adhere to them. For example a doctor can’t be blamed if a person dies as he tries to improve her conditions of healthy. The term natural is obtained in that morality of human is natural. According to this theory the purpose of human being is to live good life and a happy one. The actions which would change this purpose of human are seen to be inhuman and immoral. The law that doesn’t have a way of creating good life is considered as an unjust law. A good law is always moral. Applying this theory to the case delshondra the doctors are supposed to care of him until the last minute he dies. Termination of one’s life is going against this …show more content…

Duty-based ethics encompasses doing what is right, fail to do wrong things and doing things because they are right ones to be done. Using this theory of ethics an action can’t be justified by showing its good results and this makes this theory to be termed as non-consequentialist (Granitz 300). This ethic is usually what people talk of when they refer to “the principle of the thing”. Actions are proved to be right, according to what they are, and people can do them regardless of whether to produce positive or negative impacts. Deontologists live in a universe where they believe in moral rules such as, it is not good to steal, wrong to kill people who are innocent and also to tell lies (McNaughton 67). A person under principles deontology will always do the right thing even if it is producing harm. For example Kant the philosopher thought it was wrong to lie in order to save a murderer. According to this duty-based theory of ethics, the life of delshondra should be preserved by all protocols because that is what is right. It’s wrong even if it may cut down expenses when his life is terminated

Open Document