Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The philosophy of socrates
Essays of socrates
The life and works of Socrates
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
10. Explain Socrates’ view that ‘to be wicked (or: unethical or immoral in some way) is to hurt yourself more than you hurt anyone else’. 4 points Socrates’s view that one’s wicked actions cause more self-harm than the harm caused to others, stemmed from the fact that Socrates placed more value on soul than on the physical body. By being wicked, or making unethical or immoral decisions, one not only harms others immediately but one will harm their soul by turning oneself towards wickedness and making it harder to seek out virtue. He believed that since being wicked is the worst thing that may happen to a person and that each person choose on their own accord to be wicked or virtuous. 11. Why does Socrates think it is important to continue …show more content…
Socrates also considered true wisdom to be the knowledge and acceptance of the fact that one ultimately knows very little, and he found many he came across to be very unwise. By continuing to question people on philosophical issues, I believe Socrates not only sought to gain clarity certain philosophically problematic issues, but to spread what he believed to be true wisdom by revealing to the people of Athens the boundaries of their …show more content…
René Descartes, as a Rationalist, believed that the only indubitable knowledge that can be acquired, is the knowledge acquired through pure reasoning and with no physical experience necessary, while John Locke, as an Empiricist believed knowledge could only be gained by experience via the senses and then contemplation on such experiences. The philosophers’ hit another discord regarding their stances on innate principals. The Rationalist, Descartes, argued that there must be priori truths (those which are not learned through experience or observation, but are principals we are born with), while the Empiricist rejects this possibility emphatically. Locke believed instead that we are born with no innate knowledge, as a “tabular rasa” or a ‘blank slate,’ upon which impressions are made by the experiences we encounter. 13. Write a paragraph explaining Descartes’ ‘Method of Doubt’. 4 points In order to determine which principals are definitive, René Descartes set about his attempts to determine which of his beliefs, if any, were true. He did so by using his Method of Doubt, wherein he subjected his beliefs to the basis that, if they could be disproved, then the belief was flawed and subject to doubt. He concluded that the basis for most of his beliefs were doubtable, including his sensory experiences - based on his Dreaming Argument and
Socrates put one’s quest for wisdom and the instruction of others above everything else in life. A simple man both in the way he talked and the wealth he owned, he believed that simplicity in whatever one did was the best way of acquiring knowledge and passing it unto others. He is famous for saying that “the unexplained life is not worth living.” He endeavored therefore to break down the arguments of those who talked with a flowery language and boasted of being experts in given subjects (Rhees 30). His aim was to show that the person making a claim on wisdom and knowledge was in fact a confused one whose clarity about a given subject was far from what they claimed. Socrates, in all his simplicity never advanced any theories of his own but rather aimed at bringing out the worst in his interlocutors.
"Do we say that one must never in any way do wrong willingly, or must one do wrong in one way and not in another?"3 Socrates tries to help people understand that mistakes are human nature, however to do wrongful things on purpose should not be tolerated. Crito agrees with Socrates statement, "So one must never do wrong."4 Crito believes in what Socrates is expressing, yet he wants Socrates to perform an unreasonable action and escape from prison. A big thing for Socrates is trust and being loyal to his family and city. "When one has come to an agreement that is just with someone, should one fulfill it or cheat on it?" Crito believes one should fulfill it. Which Socrates then states "If we leave here without the city's permission, are we harming people whom we should least do harm to? Are we sticking to a just agreement, or not?" Socrates thinks that if you commit to something you need to be a man of your word and follow through. If you make an agreement with someone, you should keep your word to the fullest extent. Socrates thinks he needs to adhere to the agreement of being in prison. He believes he shouldn’t leave unless someone tells him otherwise and to the just thing by upholding the decision. Again, Socrates doesn’t want to offend anyone or show disrespect, which shows his strong desire to always to the right
Socrates’ argument was unique in that he tried to convince the jury he was just an average man and not to be feared, but in actuality demonstrated how clever and tenacious he was. He begins with an anecdote of his visit to the Oracle of Delphi, which told him that there was no man smarter than he. He, being as humble as he is, could not take the Oracle’s answer for granted and went about questioning Athenians he felt surpassed his intelligence. However, in questioning politicians, poets, and artisans, he found that they claimed to know of matters they did not know about. Socrates considered this to be a serious flaw, and, as Bill S. Preston, Esq. put it: that “true wisdom consists in knowing that you know nothing.”
Socrates’ view on morality is that anyone can do wrong. It is said that injuring someone in return for injury to oneself is wrong. He follows this with the connection between morality and the city. You do badly without the cities authorization; you are doing wrong towards the city and the laws. He felt if you are behaving against peoples mind and in this way, behaving against the city. It is a way of destroying the cities laws and so you are hurting citizens by doing so. An example of this is the general understanding that you shouldn’t hurt your father. If you do so than you are disrespecting laws within your city. Of course you will get convicted for this, and it doesn’t change the idea that you acted against the city.
He went about doing that by questioning people. Socrates realized that he truly knew nothing, of importance. So he tried to seek the truth. To be able to do this he had an open mind, and told his followers they should also have open minds. This is why Socrates was falsely accused of a culture that was both strict and hypocritical.
using certain truths. To arrive at these truths Descartes doubted everything and especially could not trust authoritarian knowledge. This was known in the four "D's" as doctrine. The other three "D's" included the deceiving senses (empiricism), dreams (intuition), and demons (innate putting wrong ideas into our minds). Originally he doubted empirical thought because he could not even trust his senses. He used his senses only as a tool for doubting. Through doubting he felt that he could clear prejudices, which would allow him to arrive at certain truths. The goal of this destructive process was to find one clear and evident intuition that could be 100 percent certain. What he originally arrived at for a conclusion, was that everything could be doubted except doubting. However, to arrive at a truth he had to begin with a clear, evident intuition (an innate idea). This would be followed by moving from universals to particulars through deductive reasoning. He moved from the simple onto the complex incrementally, or step by step. He discovered the "I" to be the only certain truth, as his mind had to exist for him to be able to doubt. As stated earlier, Descartes truths had to begin with intuition, or an innate idea. This was the beginning of his constructive program of certainties. The first certainty wa...
In order to understand that it is better to suffer wrong than to do evil, one must understand the importance of the soul in philosophical terms. When suffering wrongdoing, only the body is harmed, verses the act of doing evil, which harms one's soul. Since the soul is the most important part to a human being, the part for which we question and examine to find the good, Socrates claims that “it is evil and disgraceful to do an unjust act” (pg. 40). Even though Socrates may be put to death, it is still not as evil as Meletus harming others and consequently harming his soul. Socrates, although sentenced to death, can have no evil occur to him because he is a good man protected by the gods.
The teaching of Descartes has influenced many minds since his writings. Descartes' belief that clear and distinct perceptions come from the intellect and not the senses was critical to his ultimate goal in Meditations on First Philosophy, for now he has successfully created a foundation of true and certain facts on which to base a sold, scientific belief structure. He has proven himself to exist in some form, to think and therefore feel, and explains how he knows objects or concepts to be real.
The argumentation I am about to confront root from Meditation Three of the book. Descartes starts with the claim that, “I am certain that I am a thinking thing,” and that sensing and imagining are merely modes of thinking existing within him (24). Then, as he is certain about clear and distinct perceptions, he implies that “everything I very clearly and distinctly perceive is true (24).” Nevertheless, there still tends to be many things that he thinks he is certain about, but then finds them doubtful (24). After questioning himself, Descartes realizes that he us...
(37) The problem is that many of the citizens of Athens who wanted Socrates dead, lacked that emotional intelligence and thought highly of themselves. So of course they become defensive when Socrates sheds light on the idea that they may be wrong. As someone who cared most about the improvement of the soul, Socrates would have made a constructive role model to the criminals of Athens, as he would go on saying, “virtue is not given by money, but that from virtue comes money and every other good of man…”(35) Socrates was able to benefit everyone alike as he had human wisdom- something that all the Athenians could relate
Socrates informs us of his principle when he says, “[.] my first principle, that neither injury nor retaliation, not warding off evil by evil, is ever right. ”(1). Retaliation and injuring other people is what Socrates did not live by. For this reason, Socrates knew that if he were to escape, the state would prosecute his family and friends.
Socrates asks if a moral person can harm anyone and Polemarchus agreed that a moral person could harm an evil man. What Socrates was trying to get at was well if this man was really moral why is he trying to harm anyone. Socrates goes on saying many things but one main point he made was as follows “It is not the job of a moral person to harm a friend or anyone else, it is the job of his opposite, an immoral person. Polemarchus agreed to this, which basically went against everything he said in the opening of this conversation. Socrates says that the claim that its right and moral to give back to people what they are owed, if this is taken to mean that a moral person owes harm to his enemies and help to his friends, turns out to be a claim no clever person would make.
Socrates was a philosopher who set out to prove, to the gods, that he wasn't the wisest man. Since he could not afford a "good" Sophist teacher, surely a student of one had to be smarter than he. He decides to converse with the youth of Athens, but concludes that he actually is wiser than everyone he speaks with. He then realizes that their lack of intelligence is the fault of their teachers. Socrates understands that the practice of "sophism" leads to a lack of self-knowledge and moral values. Socrates was later accused of corrupting the youth of Athens and put on trial. In The Apology of Socrates he sta...
Philosophy can be defined as the pursuit of wisdom or the love of knowledge. Socrates, as one of the most well-known of the early philosophers, epitomizes the idea of a pursuer of wisdom as he travels about Athens searching for the true meaning of the word. Throughout Plato’s early writings, he and Socrates search for meanings of previously undefined concepts, such as truth, wisdom, and beauty. As Socrates is often used as a mouthpiece for Plato’s ideas about the world, one cannot be sure that they had the same agenda, but it seems as though they would both agree that dialogue was the best way to go about obtaining the definitions they sought. If two people begin on common ground in a conversation, as Socrates often tries to do, they are far more likely to be able to civilly come to a conclusion about a particular topic, or at least further their original concept.
Socrates was a wise man who realized that life was not something that could be easily understood. He knew that questioning life would lead to a stronger conception of life and reality. When he stated that “the unexamined life is not worth living” (Plato 45), he truly meant that without questioning life, one would not be truly living. Actions would have no understanding of being right or wrong. For Socrates, a man who believed that life should be based on what was right, there would be no greater wrongdoing.