What About Miracles John Polkinghorne Summary

609 Words2 Pages

In “What about Miracles?” author John Polkinghorne seeks to define the concept of a miracle, and establish its existence through Christianity’s cornerstone miracle: the Resurrection of Jesus. At its root, a miracle is defined as an act or occurrence that inspires astonishment. Further exploration of miracles seems to attach significance to what may otherwise be simple coincidences. Polkinghorne explains that it is in the synchronization of two seemingly unrelated events that acts to cause amazement, leading some to believe “the course of nature has been violently interrupted” (Polkinghorne 99). Skeptics such as David Hume, who believes that because the concept of a miracle defies the laws of nature, its existence is impossible, reject this. Polkinghorne illustrates this with the example of Jesus’ words calming a threatening storm. Although one could see this as the storm settling to Jesus as merely coincidence, it is much more significant to view it in the lens of a miracle occurring, one that …show more content…

Existing outside of the realm of science and in the world of theology, many have difficulty accepting miracles as reality without quantitative evidence. In a world where we seek evidence to establish fact, it is difficult to rely on faith alone. Many also struggle with the idea that since miracles are an act of God, why would God act in a way that goes in opposition of established divine law? Would this not be contradictory? God must be consistent above all, and the idea of a contradiction appears to some as a flaw in what should be a perfect system. Polkinghorne sees miracles not as a change in divine law, which to some implies contradiction, but a change in the consequences of these laws, like the vaporization of liquid water at 100º C. In other words, miracles don’t “break” rules, but take place in ways that act differently in response to the

Open Document