Was Julius Caesar Justified

709 Words2 Pages

Julius Caesar was murdered by his own co-workers and the Senate in 44 BC. He said he wanted what was best and fair for the Roman Republic, however he managed to instead absorb total power; he was self-centered, and this ultimately lead to his strategized death. When Caesar died, the republic fell and Rome became an empire with one supreme leader. All in all, Julius Caesar brought death upon himself and earned this unfortunate punishment.
Julius Caesar glued the broken pieces of the Roman Republic together by addressing and resolving economic, social, and legislative issues. He managed to decrease debt, provide land for veterans who wished to reside in Rome, and expanded occupation opportunities (Boatwright et al., 257-261). According to Michael Parenti, author of The Assassination of Julius Caesar, Caesar was widely know as the “democratic king” for his success in politics. He made it a priority to equalize the people of Rome, both the rich and the poor, and Caesar desired a healthy balance between the two classes without violence or intolerable treatment (Parenti, 164). In addition, Caesar …show more content…

The Greeks and Romans despised tyrants, and according to R. E. Smith, if a man denied citizens “the exercise of freedom according to established law”, he could be killed under the pretense of tyrannicide. Plato once wrote that life under a tyrant equaled enslavement. Brutus, a main conspirator, agreed and said that it was “better to rule nobody than to be enslaved to somebody” (Sedley, David, 49). A ruler became a tyrant once he put himself above the laws of the state, which Caesar did when he took special powers. The Senate granted Caesar these rights, for they were too afraid to oppose him (Sedley, David,

More about Was Julius Caesar Justified

Open Document