Was Julius Caesar Justified Essay

931 Words2 Pages

In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar's assassination brings up many important moral questions, most importantly that of whether Caesar's death was justified. During Caesar’s process of becoming the emperor of Rome, he takes humble approaches to become a suitable ruler for Rome. Even though he does everything right and takes precise steps to becoming emperor, he is still very despised. A group of conspirators end up murdering Caesar out of pure arrogance. Essentially, Julius Caesar’s murder was not justified because the men would construct reasons out of their own jealousy and anger to justify Caesar’s death. During the play Caesar demonstrates humility and respect for his people: “And then he offered it the third time. He put it the/ third time by, …show more content…

And for mine own part, I durst not/ laugh for fear of opening my lips and receiving the bad air” (1.2.253-261). Even though Caesar wanted the crown and to rule Rome, he still refused the crown three times. He was reluctant to receive power because he wanted to prove his humility to the people of Rome; this meant he wanted to be forced by the people to receive the crown, rather than simply taking it and risking being viewed as a boastful ruler. By proving his humility, he shows that as a ruler, he will put his people first rather than his personal wants or needs. When the conspirators plotted Caesar’s death, they only focused on his few downsides, rather than thinking about his positive attributes, including how he had the best intentions for Rome. In addition, Caesar wants his people to feel at ease with him as a ruler and ultimately wants the best for his people: “Here is the will, under Caesar’s seal/ to every Roman citizen he gives/ to every several man-seventy-five drachmas/” (3.2.232-341).

Open Document