Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Narrative composition in flashback
Waltz with bashir analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Narrative composition in flashback
In the film Waltz with Bashir, the main character Ari Folman, discovers he has no recollection of his time in the Israeli-Lebanese war. All he has left is a vision of himself and other soldiers bathing in water, while flair light up the sky. Ari embarks on a mission to seek out what really happened in the war. The story of his journey to remember the details of a horrific massacre that took place, is told through colorful and seemingly hallucinogenic animation. The story, as well as the way it is present, is meant to show that our brains have the nature to suppress horrifying and disturbing memories. As time goes on, these memories lay dormant in our subconscious. While ever present, they are hidden in the deepest parts of our minds. Eventually the memories return to Bashir. As soon as Bashir regains his memory, and learns of the horrors that took place, …show more content…
This is seen in the fact that the final seen of the film is real life documentary footage. Rather than in cartoon form, the audience is subjected to real life violence. “There is no formal capitulation to routine verité, as some viewers have objected, in this plummet through a hyperbolic, computer-assisted imaginary to the analogue real; nothing pat about the 180-degree turn from show-stopping graphics to a straightforward graphic violence.” (Stewart 62) The return the reality of the situation is abrupt. One moment the screen is filled with cartoon images, the next we see real people suffering. Had the movie been a straight forward documentary, rather than animated, I believe it would have been tougher to accept the director’s point of view in film. If the audience had seen civilians dying through the film, rather than animated characters dancing and strumming their gun like a guitar, there would have been less sympathy for the main character’s plight. It is tough to connect with a character, while innocent people are being murdered
It applied all ethos, logos, and pathos perfectly and was very interesting to watch. Their argument was that people who go on a killing spree are not just doing it for fun, they suffer from mental illness and if people see these signs in someone else, then maybe it can be prevented in the future. This argument doesn’t justify the act of mass killing it simply explains what the cause may be behind it. With the helpful use of rhetoric for their argument, this film set up a very good evidence to back up their argument and open the eyes of viewers to spread
2. According to Sobchack, contemporary screen violence greatly differs than portrayals of violence in years past. Today, violent scenes are careless and lack significance because we as audiences have become calloused and desensitized to any acts of violence. She states that there is “no grace or benediction attached to violence. Indeed, its very intensity seems diminished” (Sobchack 432). Senseless violence, gruesome acts, and profound amounts of gore are prevalent in movies today, and because even this is not enough, it must be accompanied by loud blasts and noise, constantly moving scenes to keep audiences stimulated and large quantities of violence for viewers to enjoy what they are watching. Decades ago, it was the story that was engaging to audiences and filmmaking was an art.
In today's day and age, it's rare to see famous historical events and societal disasters not be picked apart by film directors and then transformed into a box office hit. What these films do is put a visual perspective on these events, sometimes leaving viewers speculating if whatever was depicted is in fact entirely true. I have never felt that feeling more than after I finished watching Oliver Stone’s JFK.
This report aims to make light of certain elements of documentary making that are perhaps more susceptible to influence on the director’s part, and once again explore the effect of these decisions on the audience’s reaction to the information presented.
The Great Depression of the 1930’s caused widespread poverty, but the popular culture of the time did not reflect this. People wanted to escape from this harsh time so movies, dancing and sports became very popular. Radios broadcasted boxing matches and boxers became stars. The heavyweight champion James J. Braddock aka “Cinderella Man,” gained popularity. James Braddock gained fame by winning many fights and proving everyone wrong when they said he was too old and couldn’t win.
One issue that arises is in the court case the movie made the fact that the captives were really from Africa dramatically by evidence, while in real life a simple statement was from the captives was enough. During the film Spielberg focuses on stereotypes of the captives, and doesn’t use the information that was written down by John Barber on the captive’s life and story. The last mistake that I feel was made about the movie was that it lacked the information that truly showed how complex and harsh Africa was at the time. It completely disregarded the real role of the war in Africa and how much it added to the story. Personally I feel that while these inaccuracies didn’t taint the story to much as the same basic story was still there, just Hollywoodized. Though I do feel like it doesn’t represent history enough. The fact that so much information about Africa and the captives being less humanized does fade away from the true story. Personally I enjoyed the movie, but I feel that reading the true story was a lot more interesting as it showed just how important it was for such an incident to
In this day in age, it is very common to find films adapted from books. Many of those films do a very well in their adaptations, but some fall short. Since it was finished, and even before its release date, the V for Vendetta film has gained some controversy from its own author. But, although the film did not end up how Alan Moore, the author, would have wanted it, he did not contribute to the project, even so, the filmography very clearly kept with the original work and showed itself as a product of the time.
...s at that time who have come of age. Perhaps no film in recent history has captured more attention and generated more controversial debate. This film resonates the feeling and question that common people had about the JFK assassination in the 60s. As a result, the debate about the validity of JFK extended much further into the war-torn cultural landscape of America in the 1990s than most observers noted. The JFK was a telling incident demonstrating the larger cultural conflict over values and meaning in America and the competition to define national identity. The whole affair demonstrated how effective a motion picture can be as a transmitter of knowledge, history, and culture. As a result, the debate about the validity of JFK extended much further into the war-torn cultural landscape of America in the 1990s than most observers have noted.
...sening up in this country, although not quite to the extreme as in Natural Born Killers. Despite the controversy caused by the assumed message that "killing is cool," there is important ideology embedded within the film. There is sanity within the insane. The film, in a sense, displays the consequences caused by the suppression of the inner, free soul. We've all seen instances of people "cracking" under the pressures of modern society. I'm not suggesting that we live like wild animals, but I do think that Natural Born Killers is an excellent movie which made a natural attempt to kill standard ideology.
As a viewer, the documentary’s intention to inform is more completely fulfilled by research conducted beyond the scope of the camera lens. Had I never written this paper, for instance, the reason for all the violence embedded within the subject matter would remain as enigmatic as the documentary itself.
In Defiance, the deviations from the historical record are used to emphasis certain aspects of the movie. In the beginning sequence the audience can see how there is a mesh of video of Hitler imposed with footage that the director made to look older. If a person had never seen the original footage they would not see the subtle mixture of fact and fiction. But this practice raises the question should directors be able to add or subtract from the historical accuracy of a movie, especially one with a subject matter such as the Holocaust. In the case of movies that are based on the real life experiences of individuals the deviation makes the matter more accessible to a large group of people. There are many aspects of someones life are not easily readable when place on the screen. In order for them to be understood some liberty must be given to the director to make them understandable to someone who may not know the culture or the traditions behind the actions. In a scene of Defiance Zus, played by Liev Schreibe...
...gulations on the film industry. However the decision to view violent media is made by the individual. Blaming film production companies for the violence inspired by films is like accusing tobacco companies for lung cancer. The effects of viewing violent media are detrimental, but in order to reduce the problem individuals need to take action.
One could easily dismiss movies as superficial, unnecessarily violent spectacles, although such a viewpoint is distressingly pessimistic and myopic. In a given year, several films are released which have long-lasting effects on large numbers of individuals. These pictures speak
...ctual roles, or adding in exciting events that revise the storyline. These changes are beneficial to producers because they engage a large audience and generate massive profits. In contrast, they do not always have a positive effect on viewers. Although they are entertaining which is an important aspect of theatre culture, they also are often misguiding. Many spectators take movies at face value, without considering that they may not exactly qualify as primary source material. Even when an historical event is fabricated to teach or enhance a moral message, it still doesn’t compensate for bending the truth. Moviegoer’s may have a positive experience and gain some skewed historical perspective, perhaps better than what they knew before the movie, but they loose out on the truth and therefore, a genuine understanding of the historical event, and its significance.
...ion allows the film to exist unto itself with its totality defined by distinctive (independent) subjectivity. Like in many of his other movies, Kubrick litters Full Metal Jacket with symbolism and metaphor, but these directorial techniques need not be examined to enjoy or understand the plot of the movie. Although the split nature of the film expounds upon both the ability of the viewer to concentrate and be distracted by representations (logic vs. overriding emotion), it is also an exhibit for the dualist nature of man, i.e., the final marching chant. The use of a Disney song in any respect implies an association to innocence and good-will; applying it as a closing scene in a sequence that is dominated by a tirade of destruction is a more obvious symbolic gesture on Kubrick’s part. Can man be both malicious & peaceful? Or is man both? Through making both explicit distinctions and connections between mercy and vengeance in the human condition as evidenced in Full Metal Jacket as the preparation for (1st half) and execution of technique (2nd half) when existing in a war-state, Kubrick illustrates the disjunctive corollary (1st half & 2nd half) that war is organized chaos.