Wall-E: Humanity's Irresponsibility

692 Words2 Pages

The film WALL-E underlines the environmental issue of humanity’s irresponsibility in caring for Earth. It begins by negatively conveying the planet. Just as the lyrics of Put On Your Sunday Clothes (non-diegetic sound) get to, “Close your eyes and see it glisten, Barnaby,” the Earth is shown: musty and surrounded in haze, using colour symbolism to portray age and lifelessness. The lyrics and the vision of the Earth juxtapose, contrasting the ideas of what was and what is. The haze is actually space debris, an example of humans having directly disregarded their environment. On Earth, a poster reads, “Wall-E, working to dig you out!” revealing further irresponsibility through a light-hearted poster whose tone should have reflected the crisis. …show more content…

Buy and Large and its team of robots control everything on the Axiom and, previously, Earth. The montage of Wall-E journeying to his house highlights an ultrastore, a gas station and a bank, all owned by BNL. Their jingle, “… We got all you need and so much more,” confirms subtle totalitarianism. 700 years later, humans are reliant on robots. Only the Captain views this negatively, muttering, “Honestly, it’s the one thing I get to do on this ship,” insisting on doing the announcements. The music turns adventurous; ironic since the act is not heroic. It emphasises how little the Captain does. Later, the Captain is determined to hinder Auto from preventing the ship’s return to Earth- and stands, symbolising independence. The Star Wars music stresses the event’s importance: humans can live …show more content…

The government and police, supposedly the peacekeepers, steal from the poor for personal gain. Raphael says casually, “You don’t see many police in Behala, because in a shanty you sort out your own problems,” revealing that he accepts this fact. Though a public service, the poor are denied it as the police are above helping them. When arrested, Raphael is threatened with death and hurt for information. But this is nothing to the deceit of the government. Mr. Olondriz received life imprisonment for attempting to sue the Senator with large-scale theft. He says, “‘… I thought it was all so… obvious, that I need not be afraid. I had lawyers who were relaxed… (They) had been bought… It is enough to make you laugh, almost…’”. Irony is used: the outcome of the backstory is vastly different to that expected, signifying ludicrousy. The Daily Star mocks, “... someone’s going to ask the question: ‘What was ten million dollars doing in your house, sir?’... I didn’t say that, sir… don’t shoot my family!” It utilises satire to increase the audience’s support of the writer, and ultimately the reader’s stance against

Open Document